Which one will fall first?

goybook

>>58406359
This probably.

this thread won't be around long enough to see

>>58406233
facebook or ms

>>58406233
Gaybook

>>58406233
fecesbook, but I hope ms

Facebook is already looking towards the door out of the corner of it's eye.

Pretty much nobody under 25 uses Facebook seriously anymore, if they even have one. It's 'dad's social media'. They're all on Snapchat and Instagram now.

>>58406504
in eu and asia thats not true

>>58406515
I can only speak for Germany. But it's like that here.

anyone else have the feeling that google is here to stay?

>1.-Facebook
not a real business, new generations in first wolrd nations are not intesrested, they'll be the new yahoo soon
>2.-Apple
they keep fucking up and their shepple will most likely awake
>3.-Microsoft
They are fucking up the consumer side but they are strong in business, even if the desktop eventually dies they will stay around in embedded systems
>4.-Google
Unless their funders suddenly die and their infrastructure get's islame'd they are here to stay

>>58406233
Facebook -> M$ -> Apple -> Google/Alphabet

in that order

fite me fgts

>>58406233
I'd say Microsoft. They haven't released an okay-tier OS in almost 10 years.

>>58406504
They are going to turn into a hybrid media company now. Displaying (((real))) news and original programming. All "curated" content that supports globalism and multiculti fantasy. Zuck is even going for political office now.

>>58406504
> Instagram
Isn't that what Facebook owns, as well as WhatsApp? FB isn't going to fall as soon as you think.

>>58406504

Considering Facebook owns Instagram, that's good for them.

>>58406538
Probably correct. Although I don't see Google or Apple ever going away desu.

>>58406504
?
I'm 19 and all of my friends use Facebook, and I'm what's considered a normie.

>>58406580
>>58406584
not that poster, but I think what that means isn't that people are using something else still owned by FB, it's that they're willing to use alternatives

If a new hip alternative were to come out as "the next Instagram" or whatever, NOT owned by FB, then kikebook is basically finished unless they desperately purchase a takeover

Compared to the other company's projected stability in their services, FB just isn't unique enough to outlast them all

Friendster, MySpace, all the other shitty social media sites thought *they* were the one to last but look where they are now

unless FB conjures up more jewish tricks, by their own very platform they are constantly living on the edge (relatively speaking)

from most likely to least likely:
>1. Facebook
already on their way out to irrelevance
>2. Apple
Tim Cook killing the company by putting all the eggs on the iPhone
>3. Microsoft
They're lucky that they dominate the enterprise world. I'd love them to go down though
>4. Google
future rulers of the entire world sadly

>>58406631
This. FB already reached maximum saturation and just won't reach to more people, at least in the industrialized world. And it's not like China are going to unblock it in the foreseeable future either.

They have to monetise what they already have, and in an scenario where higher revenues are expected YoY by shareholders or else you're dead that only means more aggressive ads and data collecting, which means most users will be fed up of it sooner or later when they have to ramp up the intrussiveness.

Facebook. They rely entirely on marketing data which will become worthless soon. Google is at risk too since that's like 95% of their income

>>58406233

Apple or Facebook.

Facebook will fall first. Trends don't last forever. There will eventually be something to replace it, just as it was with myspace, and everything before myspace (msn, yahoo, aol, etc)

Apple will continue to ostracize its userbase by making their products even worse than they already are. Macbook with no ports at all? A phone with no SD slot, no audio jack, no replaceable battery?

They can't keep getting away with it at the scale they always have forever. There will always be people ignorant enough to buy their products (the rich, and the poor who use it as a status symbol), but they are seriously making their stuff unusable

MS will always be around, but even they have ruined their OS. I switched to Linux because Windows became unusable.

Google will just keep growing. Normies can't understand why its bad. Google invites you to entrust them with your ENTIRE life, your meetinds (calendars), your contacts/messages/emails (android/gmail), your phone number, your work (google docs), literally everything in your life can be handled by google.

Why does this world have to suck so bad

>>58406736
>marketing data which will become worthless soon
Why?

>>58406233
in every thread like this, it always comes down to:

Facebook falls first

Apple OR M$ next

Google last

better rev up those short orders

I can't see Apple being this dominant for much longer. I know it's anecdotal, but I just see more and more normies getting tired of their high-price low-functionality garbage

>>58406794
Apple could definitely lose it's spot as the largest tech company but they're so big now that it's basically impossible that they ever go away entirely. Plus, their brainwashing efforts with children and iPads will probably pay off the same way the Mac education discount did.

>>58406433
seconded

>>58406794
Apple will be able to hold on to life for a while. But they're falling in popularity in professional markets rapidly, which carries over towards the private end user market after a while.

I don't see why some of the best paid engineers in the world can't see that they're producing such garbage concepts, it's like they want to burn it all down.

>>58406824
historically speaking, the "to big to fail" mentally just isn't reliable

not saying Apple won't last longer than say, Facebook, but it's by no means a reason why they can't sudden;y massively fuck up on a grand scale and ruin themselves

>>58406515
Nobody I know in Germany cares about Facebook. And the guys that I worked with in Asia also don't give a shit about it. It's literally MySpace.

>>58406233
Google is on its way to become one of those evil corporations e see in fictional futures

>>58406849
>historically speaking, the "to big to fail" mentally just isn't reliable
Name companies as large as Apple that ceased to exist without government intervention

File: Logo_de_Enron.svg.png (8KB, 150x148px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 150x148px

>>58406893

>>58406908
Enron at it's peak was nowhere close to the most valuable company on the planet. It was a monumental failure and I'd definitely recommend reading The Smartest Guys in the Room, but it's not the same as Apple.

Definitely Facebook - they've done a pretty poor job of keeping up with other platforms and younger generations aren't interested.

Apple have a shitton of money, they aren't going anywhere.

Microsoft have been doing pretty poorly in recent years but I genuinely think Sataya Nadella is a good CEO - I don't think they're going anywhere.

Google is fucking Google - I don't see anything viable replacing them any time soon and if anything I think their business is only going to increase, what with self driving cars and everything else they're working on.

>>58406233
It won't be facebook unfortunatelly...
Their plan is gud, I think...
http://www.businessinsider.com/zuckerbergs-3-5-and-10-year-facebook-plan-2014-10

Soooo basically global botnet.

Don't think google will fall either...

It will be M$ or apple, most likely apple...

>>58406848
According to some crap I read some time ago, basically those engineers have to work with whatever garbage design their marketing team hands them down and ram the "best" internals they can there.

>>58406929
>hind-sight bias: the post

At the time. Enron was believed to be invincible

>>58406943
Google's already got the global botnet market

linu... Oh wait linux already fell

2% lol

Microsoft isn't going anywhere in the foreseeable future. With their large portion of the video game industry and even larger foothold in the business computer industry (with little to no chance to lose business there to apple or linux) they've got a fairly secure future.

And Google ain't going anywhere, that's fore sure.

I'd say either Apple or Facebook, leaning heavily towards Facebook.

>>58406542
Nice hipster meme

File: 1469318941286.png (548KB, 700x700px) Image search: [Google]

548KB, 700x700px

So why hasn't Google just bought Facebook yet anyways?

>>58407031
Because Google knows FB is losing popularity

>>58407031
>buying a sinking ship

for what purpose

>>58407051
>losing popularity
>almost 2 billion active users

>>58407001
Yeah lets ignore that it dominates every other market and that it's marketshare grew 100% on the desktop last year. If we ignore that small details no one cares anyway, i guess you're right.

>>58407075
100% of 0 is still 0

File: 1468103209128.png (493KB, 750x750px) Image search: [Google]

493KB, 750x750px

>>58407051
>>58407065
Well now, obviously. Hindsight and all that. I mean why didn't they just gobble them up before they reached peak? It seemed like the next big thing back then.

>>58407090
Hmm, nice argument except 1% of all the desktop users is not a so small number of you know a bit of math. Just saying.

>>58406233
Apple goes down first
Microsoft will follow

>>58407107
Google has their own shitty forgettable social media platform, I see it every time I check Gmail

It seems as if they're direct competitors, so there would have been no reason to purchase their opponent to win by default when they could have been confident of their own platform and anticipated their opponent's eventual slip

>>58406233
Facebook will go like myspace

>>58407107
Because they were working on their own version of it (Google Plus)

File: 1468103830916.png (460KB, 979x735px) Image search: [Google]

460KB, 979x735px

>>58407132
But Google+ was garbage?

>>58407170
Precisely. That's why they didn't purchase -- they had their own shittier version and probably saw no reason to.

File: 1465747586592.png (464KB, 750x625px) Image search: [Google]

464KB, 750x625px

>>58407191
Oh. I get it now. Thanks Anon

Social media platforms are always the first to go, because new generations of teens coming up see new websites as being cooler than the old ones that their parents use.

>>58406955
Not really, read The Smartest Guys in the Room. There were people that saw signs of trouble well before they collapsed in 2001.

Enron was never the largest company in the world, never reported $50 billion in profit in a year, and never had over $230 billion in cash reserves.

>>58407170
I wish they made campers like this, I'd buy one in a heartbeat.

>>58407157
Yeah, I assume the same thing would happen when they are no longer able to buy new "facebook killer" memes like instagram

>>58407300
Pretty sure they do m8. But there are tons of forums and resources online on how to make these yourselves. Obviously, you need a camper first but the conversion isn't even that expensive depending on the quality and polish you want to achieve.

/diy/ has these threads like once a month

File: 1450200766274.jpg (12KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 250x250px

>>58407338
Thanks for the tip.

>>58407254

Apple's cooking the books. They don't have nearly that much money so when they fail it's going to come as a shock to everyone except those people that knew they were lying all along.

>>58407499
don't bother replying to bait, the applecuck will just ask for proofs that they're tim cooking the book and continue to wank Jobs' dead body under the to big to fail mentality

>>58406233
I think Facebook will be the only one of these to truly fall out of the market.

I'm only on Facebook still because I'm a musician and I use it to book events and advertise my music - this is the same point where MySpace started to go south- people started using it because of the utility it provides and less and less because they like it, in fact most people hated it toward the end and were eager for an alternative.

>>58406233
facebook they will die or will gonna be absorbed by others (M$ or google)
apple they just are falling since steve jobs died by aids cancer, they dont have any roots beside their fanbase
M$ or google idk both have alot of thing to stay

File: 70005041153016022700400.jpg (10KB, 240x180px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 240x180px

>>58407300
Mitsubishi Town Box. Some even have roofs that open completely. There are threads like this occasionally on /out/ too

I don't have Facebook for about a year now and I never had Instagram, or snapchap because I'm ugly. I use whatsapp because I need a free way to communicate if needed. I don't care about botnet but I still use Arch. I have a Android phone and use default Google services. I am 24 and if all of companies mentioned above fall soon I, same as my opinion, am irelevant because 2009+ kids will pick the next rulers..

Facebook will fail first. Shit economic model... no respect for privacy... overhyped...

>>58406233
facebook then apple
microsoft absorbs apple and shit goes wild

>>58406233
Probably facebook, but it doesn't matter as long as they all fall and fast, with Samsung, ORACLE, CISCO and a handful of other companies following.

>>58407522

Apple's hardly too big to fail. They don't account for a significant percentage of the computing space, according to the latest Gartner report iOS has a similarly minuscule market share of the smartphone market (12.9% vs 86.2% for Android), and iTunes is 64% of the -paid- digital music downloads. If Apple failed it would do basically NOTHING to the computing market and would be a minor annoyance in the smartphone space. Digital downloads would transfer to one of a gajillion other services so no big deal there.

Basically, Apple isn't an important company. They're not critical in any way, shape, or form.

>>58407107
Because Google is jew owned and Facebook too, Google only buys goyim stuff only so they can shit on in

>>58406504
They still use Kikebook for the meme pages. They just take all the memes and throw them onto 1 channel.

>>58406504
I can see why they are moving away from grannybook but i just don't see the allure of snapchat. Images that you can't keep and get deleted? What good is that? seems like an overrated chat application.

>>58408027
it's an illusion of privacy

people keep messages all the time by screenshotting or using third-party tools to capture videos etc.

basically normies are gullible when it comes to privacy, so they're more apt to share lewd things and get mad when you keep it

>>58408027
It is for chatting. I don't see why people call it a social media, shouldn't kik, Whatsapp and other chatting apps be called social media too then?

Goybook and hopefully Fapple

Facebook

>>58408059
Social media AKA questionable news sources.

>>58406528
That's not true.

I don't see MS falling any time soon as long as everyone is slave to Office and Windows.

>>58406233
facebook = microsoft -> apple -> google

Microsoft can't seem to do anything right, facebook has absolutely no foundation, apple is actually competent, and google is so embedded in the modern web they might as well be an intelligence agency

Another poster from Germany, the rare time my friends go on Granniebook, they just use it like 9gag or Buzzfeed v2, seriously facebook is full of useless shit now, just like my country

Also Facebook owns the shitty version of everything, Telegram and Line work better than WhatsApp, Vine, Snapchat, and Tumblr are better than Instagram, and funny enough WhatsApp and Instagram work better than Facebook

>>58408201
>Vine
Wasn't that discontinued recently?

>>58408201
I haven't used facebook in years. My profile just collects dust.

Honestly I should probably just update it with more bluepilled propaganda / good goy likes so it confuses NSA/CIA tracking algorithms and hopefully I stop getting flagged as a shit disturber for wrongthink.

>>58408027

yep, and they're completely against 3rd party apps like Casper that allows you download pics and videos at will.

Yahoo will be the next tech company to fall. Not that anyone will notice anyway.

>>58406743
>Why does this world have to suck so bad

KYS. Trust me, the next one is better

>>58406580
Whatsapp is the only real asset they have, Instagram is a dead platform feature wise all the new stuff was taken directly from snapchat. When the snapchat successor arrives it'll be over for instagram.

Whatsapp is a huge asset though, it has bilions of users which produces huge amounts of metadata to sell to advertisement companies. And I can see that source of money ending only when and if we'll get rid of internet ads in their current form.

That's why Facebook may be one of the last to die, in fact they were very clever and diversified their possession before anybody could even think about them going out of business. At the time everyone wondered why the hell would Facebook buy Instagram and Whatsapp, here's why.

Advertising/big data bubble pops and sets of startup bubble chain reaction that kills Facebook and Google.

Not 'cease-to-exist', that doesn't happen, but major falls.

>>58408225
Most of the apps I mentioned have small userbases but they have better user interfaces, better content, less ads and spying and more social component
>>58408242
Even some of my Chad and Stacy friends have dead profiles, they are onto Instagram and WhatsApp

>>58406233
the walking order in your image answers your question

>>58408270
I think a post capitalism internet is coming soon. Once the big ISP's start capping everyone at 2kb per month and charging $800 that will be the end of it.

After that there will be more and more mesh networks popping up. Pirateboxes. GPRS links etc.

Also Whatsapp is the only reason I have a phone anymore, if there was Whatsapp available for desktop, I would live phoneless desu, shit is so distracting.

>>58408340
web.whatsapp.com

>>58407914
>Apple's hardly too big to fail.
Too big to fail is a designation frequently provided to big banks due to the harm that their collapse would cause to the economy. I never said Apple was too big to fail, I said their failure would be unprecedented.

>>58408180
>google is so embedded in the modern web they might as well be an intelligence agency
Yep, it's kind of scary how big Google is.

>>58408338
We can only hope.

>>58408354
Except you got to have it on the phone or it to work

>>58408378
I wonder if they have emergency plans for if some form of the US government seizes the company and its assets

>>58408338
Have you tried living in an actual free country instead of your 'free' country?

Normies are realising that Facebook hasn't been fun for some years already, and that there's no point in going through the avalanche of fake news, clickbait, anti-science bullshit, and asinine comments shared by your dumb coworkers, your racist-ass grandma, your drunk uncle or your couch-activist cousin, all laced with a constant stream of advertising and sponsored posts. It's just a matter of time until they go the way of MySpace.

>>58406233

>Google

So integrated with the internet, there is little to no chance of them falling anytime soon. I cannot think of an area of the market they are not involved in.

>Microsoft

Making a come back. Their easy-to-use subscription based hosted Exchange, OneDrive, Office product solutions found a really good niche. Small-to-medium sized businesses that don't have a full-size IT department.

>Apple

They made some bad choices lately, but they have so much capital and loyal consumer base I do not see them going out of business anytime soon.

>Facebook

Definitely losing market share in the younger generations as mentioned. I don't think they'll fall, but they'll become more irrelevant overtime. They may end up buying out some other companies though to try and adapt.


You forgot to mention Amazon.

>>58408507
Amazon has everything overpriced but they are working in amazing (hehe) stuff, I think Amazon should split into different websites because right now the website looks like the clothes and other products section of an Aldi supermarket

>>58408507
I'm not concerned with Amazon since they seem to be seen in a better light than ebay when it comes to online ordering

However, their own technology market has been utter failures from echo, memephones, and their half-assed kindles

But they can afford to make such mistakes so it's not like it matters.

The only way Amazon could get behind is if their good shipping name gets tarnished or outcompeted, but that doesn't appear likely

>>58408619
First time I used ebay, I got scammed because the entire buying/selling process is so fucking convoluted.

I ask guy to cancel my order because it was past the ship date and he still hadn't actually shipped it to me, he sends some offer to cancel and it cancels the order but he gets to keep my money. How the fuck does that work? I don't know. It was the first and last time I used ebay.

>>58408697
See that's exactly why Amazon got so big

>>58408473
I don't know what you've been told but most of America is full of poor people. Outside of the major metro areas it's basically brazil tier economic conditions but without the nice weather.

We don't have the money to just pick up and travel to other countries.

Google isn't Alphabet, Facebook isn't only facebook.com, Microsoft isn't only windows and office and Apple is only faggotory so will still while 4chan still up.

Microsoft

>>58406233
Facebook

>>58406233

Twitter

File: ggh.jpg (12KB, 258x252px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 258x252px

>>58408778
>Microsoft isn't only Windows and Office

AKSSHUEALLY

>>58406233
Facebook, it easy to replace and imitate.

The other companies have something unique that requires a long-term commitment from the users, they are basically irreplaceable.
It is easy to make a Facebook clone and if there ever is a major desaster within Facebook or the trend simply stops, like it has for many other social media sites, it may fall easily.

>>58406385
>we will put a window that will nag you to make a account
>you must like the page in order to download this content
>we spawned many download gates that will make real freetards BTFO
>we told vkontakte to tell the people, who are unregistered and want to play audio, BTFO
Goybook should really die.

>>58406504
they've corrupted vkonatke with it's 'you must register in order to play audio' bullshit

>>58406504
Not in the US

>>58406537
>Ms fucking up customer side
Tell that to windows 10, Xbox, and the surface line

>>58406233
1. Applel
2. Facebook or Micro***t
3. Google (last company standing)

>>58408922
Prove I wrong.

>>58406233
facebook -> m$ -> jewgle -> apple

>>58409384
>you can rip a video from youtube and post it on your wall, no need for credits or sources
>you will get all the money for the views

I seriously doubt FB will fall any time soon. It's gone from simple social media to spreading into everything like google does. A lot of places use it, and its often used as a sign in medium.

>>58406233
Fagbook because they censor people on the right while keeping ISIS and anti-white racism online.

Also kind reminder that the fall of facebook and twitter will cause next economic crash.

>>58406233
goybook

>>58406233
google, apple and microsoft will live forever. Facebook will be gone soon enough.

>>58409460
this

it might not be perfect but it is strong. Pc gaming will always hold microsoft up.

Microshit's on the way out with two failures of an OS recently, plus public knowledge of the botnet.

Facespace will be replaced by Twitter. Only grandmas use it now.

Apple will be around a while since hipsters aren't going out of fashion yet.

Google will always exist because it'll buy up the failures above.

2017 is YotLD

>>58406233
>hopefully
microsoft

>probably
apple

>maybe
facebook

>never
google

>>58406552

Do you believe the things you say or are you just looking for attention?

1. Microcuck
2. Facebook
3. Google
I don't see Apple going away desu, they're a cult classic of computing. M$ has been ruined by pajeets and le tile design will finally crumble when their next OS angers /v/ toddlers

>>58406537
>Microsoft
>Embedded systems
Why?

>>58406673
pretty much this. apple won't go anywhere though, they're popular with normies and have massive amounts of cash to protect them.

>>58409460

Windows moves on inertia as always, Xbox is absolute trash, and the surface line isn't selling enough to justify it's R&D costs.

Try again.

In order
>Facebook, it's peaked, so it will reinvent itself to try and keep the shekels flowing, aka Instagram and Oculus

>Apple, some people are starting to get fed up of the whole rehashing shit but most are too deep into the ecosystem to jump ship, some have had the balls to though.

>Microsoft, waaaaay too much capital and such to fail, they've had a rocky couple of years with Windows 8, Windows 10 Botnet, Xbone launch and such, but their dominance over the PC market, both home and enterprise will never let them fail

>Google, you really think the US will allow the biggest botnet to collapse? Exactly

>>58406890
They even have given up the "Don't be evil" slogan.

File: 1483838905338.jpg (115KB, 750x659px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 750x659px

>>58406233
I only use Mac OS, so even if all of those companies die, I can just install Debian again and not really be impacted at all.

Microsoft, Apple and Google flit between success and failure take it in their stride and would take something super disruptive to dislodge them. Facebook otherwise has had one long period of success and it would only take something sort of disruptive to increase usage in something else putting them in the same demise of Freindster, MySpace and Bebo. Also they use PHP so it's not like they are going to innovate something soon.

>>58408027
>>>58406504
>I can see why they are moving away from grannybook but i just don't see the allure of snapchat. Images that you can't keep and get deleted? What good is that? seems like an overrated chat application.
Cause you've never received nudes faggot

>>58411514
Wait, what?

Women really do that?

>Which one first
This is the wrong question. The right, however, would have been:
>Would they all fall?
>What we can do, to make them fall even faster?

>>58411547
yep

false sense of security and all

While facebook the site is not hip anymore, their other company, snapchat, has gained a lot of traction. That being said, I've read that snapchat is a chat program, meaning that a company can't say 'find us on snapchat!' like they currently do with FB and Twitter. This mainstream integration is what made FB feel so omnipresent.

>>58406552

I think this will be the case. FB will turn into a hybrid media/social site. They've already implemented a safety check feature for when shootings and such go on. FB might turn into a social news site.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook_Safety_Checks

>>58407338
damn i gotta check that out. ive always wanted a trailer I can tow behind my car and live in

>>58409460
Xbone is a disaster though.

File: 1481741904523.jpg (115KB, 600x661px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 600x661px

>>58412104
fagbook doesn't own fagchat but they do own instafag.

>>58408507
I'm hoping Amazon will ride their Alexa popularity and compete with Google and Microsoft more.
Try to compete more with YouTube, Play Store, etc, maybe even invest in a Firefox or Chromeium fork to compete with Chrome. All the shit Google basically has a monopoly on.

mombook will die first.

>>58407075
Yeah the fridge market :Dddd

>>58406233
Faceshit, Microcock, Applel, Google, in that order.

>>58412897
Google won't die, it will just slowly merge with the NSA

>>58409460
>Tell that to windows 10,
oh you mean the operating system that Microsoft had to basically trick people into downloading, and which only represents a 19% part of the OS marketshare compared to the 50% of Windows 7?

10 is fucking competing with Windows XP (10%) for second place

>Xbox,
im pretty sure I heard talk of Xbox being on the chopping block.

and this is also the system that completely botched it's reveal by trying to shove as much anti-consumer DRM as they could into the Xbone, and got walked all over by Sony's unveiling, by a "how to share PS4 games" zinger

>>58411547
Where the fuck have you been living?

>>58406504
But Facebook is #1 on Alexa, and pretty much every website ranking system ever

>>58406233
If ((((((((((((((((((((yahoo)))))))))))))))))) is still aroun d, then don't expect any of these to go anytime soon.

>>58413505

>fell for the dont be evil propaganda

google has and always will be nsanigger

>>58406824
but iPads were short lived despite Apples efforts

File: ur mum.gif (887KB, 300x218px) Image search: [Google]

887KB, 300x218px

>>58413589
>yahoo
>still around

Yeah, just like AOL.

>>58406233
facebook, sooner or later something else will come along and all the people will think it is hip and great and facebook will be history, remember when MySpace is hot, how about Yopper Linux, everybody thought that was the top dog distro and it evenually fell off the map completely , even apple and microsoft are starting to see the rough edges of age as android and Linux takes bites out of their userbase

>>58406233
None of them will fall, they all have steady income streams. The worst that can happen is that one of them shits the bed, downsizes to a sustainable level, and then builds up again slowly.

File: portalbowl.gif (321KB, 300x168px) Image search: [Google]

321KB, 300x168px

>>58413716
>tfw we will see the rise of Linux and have to jump ship once people start writing more viruses for it

File: a5gbyhyg.jpg (63KB, 400x366px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 400x366px

>>58406939
>MS has been doing poorly

>>58406359
Goybook will be gone by 2020

Twitter will disappear before any of them

File: implying.jpg (120KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 1200x1200px

>>58414553
>implying the NSA will let their best tool for controlled insurrection and psyops go to waste after it's effective use on the Arab Srping