So, what happened to this project and why did it die?
Which one was this?
>>58389332
lo/g/os
>>58389345
Ah another linux distro!
Yea that community needs more fracturing, and entire new distros to solve the problem of people having to type yum install or yum uninstall when they first set up their env
>>58389366
I was more intrested in the ricing tool they were developing as a side project
>>58389387
Well ricing tools are inherently uselss. Most people use linux for real work and wasting time making it look pretty while taking away functionality (im talking about you, retarded terminal working directory prefixes) wont gather traction from anyone but faggots
>>58389407
Style before substance
>>58389420
Get back to me after you impress someone with your cool terminal font colors.
>>58389439
you can impress plenty of people. the point is impressing someone that actually matters
well at least the logo is nice.
>>58389315
I thought it was done? Atleast the logo.
>>58389387
The ricing tools never got started They only just got past agreeing to use i3.
They were all unfriendly, no cooperation
>>58389315
Here is the old Github:
https://github.com/install-logos/logos
anyone post the magnet link to last build
>>58389559
Not true - more like incompetent. They were all ok with pulling existing arch packages together, but when it came to actually writing some code, no-one stepped forward.
>>58389626
I'll bet some of them wrote something but was embarrassed to show it.
>>58389315
It looks done to me, except the background should be transparent.
>>58389767
Majority of the hours spent on this project went to deciding whether the background should be opaque white or transparent.
There is a pull request for the transparency that is still unapproved.
>>58389315
All the other answers ITT are wrong. The real reason is that the logo is done, so there is nothing more the average /g/ poster can contribute.
>>58389315
nobody worked on anything except shitty logos and the actual product was shitty and borkd