Post ram usage

File: Ram.png (34KB, 552x236px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 552x236px

>>58384560

>>58384626
it'd be a lot faster to type

free -h

File: Screenshot_20170108_013802.png (1MB, 1680x1050px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1680x1050px

>>BOW BEFORE THE DARKNESS

File: ram.png (18KB, 884x555px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 884x555px

My FreeBSD server using 150M after a reboot, before the ZFS ARC has time to fill up much.

>>58384560
Unused RAM is wasted RAM.
Stop being a poorfag and get 16GiB of RAM
Also install linux you disgusting subhuman

>>58384938
>le unused ram is wasted ram meme

That was the phrase google chrome devs said when they were questioned about why google chrome used so much ram.

Also, there is no need to insult OP, here in /g/ we respect gays rights.

File: 1.png (135KB, 1090x609px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 1090x609px

Browsing /g/, watching a video, re-encoding some old dvds. Still struggling to use much more than 2GB unfortunately.

File: htop -home-thetooth_048.png (175KB, 1366x704px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 1366x704px

:\/

>>58384661
>Not installing scrot
>not piping commands
It's like you're trying to be retarded

File: 2017-01-08-013741_1024x768_scrot.png (370KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

370KB, 1024x768px

i have a bunch of shit open though

For once it wasn't a bunch of fucking win cucks like the specs thread. Salute fellow nix brethren

File: mem.png (46KB, 734x97px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 734x97px

>>58384560

>>58385225
your dumb

>>58385278
*You're

File: 2017-01-08-015422_1024x768_scrot.png (65KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 1024x768px

>>58385225

>>58385311
my grammer was correct the first time

File: 5TuBsmK.gif (101KB, 600x400px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 600x400px

>>58385317
you're are mother

File: a.png (44KB, 1280x1024px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 1280x1024px

>>58385225
Why even compete?

>>58384985
I don't respect any rights of any faggot

File: Screenshot_2017-01-08_02-16-08.png (2KB, 428x150px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 428x150px

>>58384560
>Can't get below 200MiB ram
Why even live

File: vistamasterrace.jpg (163KB, 1280x1024px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 1280x1024px

and i'm actually using chrome you cheaters

File: htop.png (40KB, 1329x1062px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 1329x1062px

I think I'm in last place

File: g.png (14KB, 667x414px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 667x414px

>>58385567
show me the way of living, master

>>58385611
just buy used servers

shit's so cache (as long as you don't mind the NUMA latencies)

File: 50mhz.png (49KB, 764x775px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 764x775px

Im on a different level of low.

>>58385630
Where do you buy them?

>>58385646
what is this? Some kind of smart watch or a fridge?

>>58385665
ebay.de for me

If you're in NA, check natex.us

>>58385646
>1.9GB RAM
>Windows > XP
Do you hate yourself?

>>58385567
Do you have a 40GB tmpfs partition?

>>58385674
Tablet.
I fucked with the windows cpu management because I was bored, got it down to 40mhz but it wasn't continuous enough to get a screenshot.
I also set it to never ramp up, it was surprisingly useful at 50mhz.

File: arc.png (13KB, 574x1029px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 574x1029px

>>58385691
No, but I do have a 32 GB ARC.

>>58385702
you do realize this is not 50mhz?
It's just task manager showing bullshit.

>>58385753
Cpuz also said 50ish mhz

>>58385797
then it's lying. This CPU can't go lower than 200mhz

>>58385753
I don't know about Intel Atoms, but some ARM CPUs can throttle down to ridiculously low levels.

>>58385815
Wew lad, ARMs are much simpler constructions

Fresh Win10 boot at 1.0 or 1.1 mb. Already disabled all the bloat and services I don't need but couldn't get it any lower. Still pretty good.

File: Zrzut ekranu z 2017-01-08 10-40-56.png (57KB, 759x528px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 759x528px

>>58384560
Is this the new retard thread?
Btw 1.2 gb with chrome and steam active.

File: 6.png (44KB, 640x411px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 640x411px

>>58384560
Idk how much it was using, but it was less than 128MB

>>58384938
>Unused RAM is wasted RAM.
So why haven't you written an operating system that uses all RAM at all times?

>>58386232
Why haven't you built a solar panel with 100% efficiency?

>>58386310
Because it's impossible, just as it's impossible to write an operating system that lets you do anything of worth while using up all RAM.

Unused RAM is not wasted RAM. Unused RAM is free RAM that allows other programs to function. The idea that unused RAM is wasted only encourages shoddy programming that creates applications that do less with more resources instead of doing more with fewer resources.

>>58386331
>Because it's impossible, just as it's impossible to write an operating system that lets you do anything of worth while using up all RAM.
And do you agree that unused energy is wasted energy when it comes to solar panel design? Just because it's impossible to be 100% efficient doesn't somehow change the fact that a 90% efficient system wastes 10%.

>The idea that unused RAM is wasted only encourages shoddy programming that creates applications that do less with more resources instead of doing more with fewer resources.
That's not what “unused RAM is wasted RAM” means. “unused RAM is wasted RAM” is meant to get people to understand that disk caching is good, not bad.

>>58386140
Its still the old one

>>58386356
>And do you agree that unused energy is wasted energy when it comes to solar panel design?
No. The energy is not being wasted because the energy has other applications elsewhere. The sun's energy covers an extremely large swath of the Earth and is necessary for life.

>“unused RAM is wasted RAM” is meant to get people to understand that disk caching is good, not bad.
RAM is not caching to disk, it is caching to volatile storage. A program should strive to only ever use as many resources as it needs for the task it sets out to accomplish. The remaining resources can be used for other programs that should be designed in a similar fashion. Do more with less, not less with more. Work smarter, not harder.

>>58386408
sigh, another autist who doesn't even understand the basics of what he's talking about and pulls bullshit arguments instead of accepting reality

nvm

File: 72MB.png (20KB, 394x451px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 394x451px

>>58384560
What's the prize?

Linux/BSD fags, please use https://github.com/pixelb/ps_mem to report RAM usage (it's available on Arch's community/repo).

 Private  +   Shared  =  RAM used    Program

104.0 KiB +  38.5 KiB = 142.5 KiB    chrome-sandbox
192.0 KiB + 114.0 KiB = 306.0 KiB    xinit
392.0 KiB + 161.0 KiB = 553.0 KiB    rtkit-daemon
448.0 KiB + 316.5 KiB = 764.5 KiB    startx
960.0 KiB + 135.5 KiB =   1.1 MiB    mount.ntfs
776.0 KiB + 352.0 KiB =   1.1 MiB    systemd-logind
840.0 KiB + 350.0 KiB =   1.2 MiB    systemd-resolved
  1.1 MiB + 121.0 KiB =   1.2 MiB    smartd
748.0 KiB + 511.0 KiB =   1.2 MiB    systemd-timesyncd
980.0 KiB + 350.0 KiB =   1.3 MiB    systemd-networkd
960.0 KiB + 456.5 KiB =   1.4 MiB    at-spi-bus-launcher
  1.1 MiB + 348.0 KiB =   1.5 MiB    login
980.0 KiB + 600.5 KiB =   1.5 MiB    gvfsd-fuse
  1.0 MiB + 567.0 KiB =   1.5 MiB    at-spi2-registryd
920.0 KiB + 675.0 KiB =   1.6 MiB    (sd-pam)
  1.2 MiB + 483.0 KiB =   1.7 MiB    gvfsd
  1.5 MiB + 545.5 KiB =   2.0 MiB    sudo
  1.6 MiB + 841.0 KiB =   2.4 MiB    dbus-daemon (3)
  2.8 MiB + 129.0 KiB =   2.9 MiB    systemd-udevd
  2.7 MiB + 721.5 KiB =   3.4 MiB    wpa_supplicant
  2.1 MiB +   1.3 MiB =   3.4 MiB    bash (3)
  1.7 MiB +   2.3 MiB =   4.0 MiB    systemd (2)
  7.2 MiB + 772.0 KiB =   7.9 MiB    pulseaudio
  9.5 MiB +   2.3 MiB =  11.7 MiB    compton
 11.3 MiB + 672.0 KiB =  11.9 MiB    polkitd
 11.7 MiB +   3.8 MiB =  15.5 MiB    urxvt (2)
 15.6 MiB +   4.3 MiB =  19.9 MiB    awesome
 16.4 MiB +   3.5 MiB =  20.0 MiB    pasystray
 16.3 MiB +   4.5 MiB =  20.9 MiB    systemd-journald
 25.4 MiB +   4.2 MiB =  29.6 MiB    mpd
 28.5 MiB +   1.8 MiB =  30.2 MiB    weechat
 25.3 MiB +   5.4 MiB =  30.7 MiB    Xorg
  1.0 GiB + 122.5 MiB =   1.1 GiB    chromium (11)
---------------------------------
                          1.4 GiB

>>58386759
>resolved
>networkd
>timesyncd
never go full systemd dude

File: Selection_142.png (49KB, 1025x768px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 1025x768px

30mb on command line
64mb with a browser

How did I do?

File: Screenshot_20170108-183810.png (28KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 1920x1080px

Unused ram is WASTED ram

>>58386996
VM/10

File: Selection_143.png (81KB, 1024x769px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 1024x769px

If you use more than 128mb, you're bloated

>>58387107
If that's the case why do you have 3G of RAM?

File: winner.png (13KB, 378x451px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 378x451px

>>58387107
If your memory usage is over 32MB, you're bloated

>>58386715
>less than 8gb ram
>running winblows effectively

Obviously this is un-useable.

File: Taskmgr_2017-01-08_13-34-31.png (34KB, 666x595px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 666x595px

hello

>>58384560
Lowest lose. I you don't use that RAM, you didn't need it in the first place.

>I'll buy a olympic-size swimming pool to store 2 litres of water

This is how retarded you guys are.

File: Leikepöytä02.jpg (57KB, 460x497px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 460x497px

Good thing I bought that extra stick. Sheesh.

>>58387448
>Implying that 32-bit Windows XP can use more than 3,5GB of RAM

I tend to rock usage of around 12/13gb of my 16 when working. Otherwise, I average 4-7gb used.

>>58387370
Ram drive for cache on my new home server I'm building
;^)

>>58387405
shit you've got me beat by 2.8mb

File: 2d739c50af.png (8KB, 180x435px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 180x435px

Are we talking relatively?

>>58385382
wew, now run a modern browser, tip you onli can use firefox +500Mb

             total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
Mem:         60220      20892      39328        316       1948       6480
-/+ buffers/cache:      12464      47756
Swap:            0          0          0

[Kibibyte]

File: ram.png (145KB, 1152x864px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 1152x864px

>>58387547
Not him but here's mine.
A whopping 95MB

File: a.png (292KB, 1280x1024px) Image search: [Google]

292KB, 1280x1024px

>>58387547
Are you sure?

>>58387604
vafan håller du på med

>>58387733
Förbereder Voodoo 2 Sli datorn.

>>58387745
Har du inget bättre för dig?

>>58387765
Har fyra andra datorer med En 1GHz P3, en 1.5GHz P3, P4 på 2.8GHz och en P4 EM64T på 3.0GH med.

File: ScreenShot.png (18KB, 369x89px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 369x89px

ram not used is ram wasted

File: WinNT4.png (25KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 640x480px

>>58387535
I thought that 28MB is still too much, so i had to switch to a different OS

File: Capture.png (12KB, 419x473px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 419x473px

>>58384560

File: 2017-01-08-071158_1920x1080_scrot.png (15KB, 549x246px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 549x246px

>>58384560

File: 08_01_2017_06_15_30.png (164KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 1920x1080px

>>58387790
Very impressive!
But how useful is it?
Surprisingly I can multitask under 128mb

File: Freshboot.png (35KB, 946x640px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 946x640px

Fresh boot of Win 10

Thank God I didn't fell for the 8GB RAM meme

File: ss+(2017-01-08+at+02.23.58).png (36KB, 974x732px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 974x732px

It's actually DDR3.

File: 1.png (110KB, 1843x1083px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 1843x1083px

>>58384560

File: DSC_2458.jpg (1MB, 2816x2000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2816x2000px

Do I win?

File: ram.png (175KB, 1152x864px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 1152x864px

>>58387777
Mmmm~

Removing some ram and not having Firefox open helped lowering the usage.

>>58387997
Almost.
I'm using 8.3MB

>>58388007
ohh the DOS-based systems..
I guess i can't win using NT-based system, the minimum i can get using NT 4.0 is 9,5MB

Next person that pops up will probably have Windows 3.1 running with 4mb of ram

>>58388079
It took some time to start with only 12MB.
For some reason it's showing 11MB.

>>58388090
And then someone using DOS 6.2

File: file.png (355B, 58x58px) Image search: [Google]

355B, 58x58px

fuck you guys

>>58386440
>gets rekt
>can't think of an argument back
>calls the winner stupid
typical /g/

File: 1.jpg (127KB, 1280x965px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 1280x965px

>>58384560
11521 bytes used. Do I win?

File: RAMalamadingdong.png (29KB, 646x590px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 646x590px

>All these people neglecting their precious RAM
Use +90% of it at all times or the tech jews win.

>>58388148
No, I just can't be bothered responding to somebody who doesn't even know what a block cache is

>>58388242
http://blog.tynemouthsoftware.co.uk/2016/05/oric-1-repair-part-1-reset-circuitry.html
prove it's yours, otherwise - nice try

File: Screenshot_2017-01-08_08-18-01.png (445KB, 637x1014px) Image search: [Google]

445KB, 637x1014px

>all those threads and this meme browser still fucking hangs at the slightest hint of anything requiring performance

File: 886k.png (17KB, 692x399px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 692x399px

>>58388102
>>58388090
>>58384560
Well. Here it is.
Using 886kB of RAM

>>58388255
Are you USING it, thoug

caching/ramdisk = good
windows update and background services hogging ram = bad

>>58388507

That's all used by Photoshop etc.. creative programs, so yes it's very much all in good use.

File: lulz.png (312KB, 1152x768px) Image search: [Google]

312KB, 1152x768px

>>58384560

>>58388495
I believe that's actually 886 KiB

>>58388564
Yeah, that's possible
But even if it actually is 886KiB, it's not gonna make that much of a difference, 886KiB is still only 907kB

>>58387013
unless you want to use it.

File: rekt.png (905KB, 806x605px) Image search: [Google]

905KB, 806x605px

>>58384560
Get on my level

File: solus.png (254KB, 812x502px) Image search: [Google]

254KB, 812x502px

>>58384560
Mmmm.... that built from scratch optimisation.

>>58389615
We have an official winner.

>>58389615
>microsoft
Do you have to restart it daily?

>>58385183
>not using urxvtd
mouthbreathing mongrel. discard yourself.

File: untitled1.png (317KB, 1280x1024px) Image search: [Google]

317KB, 1280x1024px

>>58385382
88MB master race

File: Untitled-1.jpg (144KB, 450x459px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 450x459px

>>58384560

Unused RAM is wasted RAM, pham.
"RAM heavy" processes only ever become a problem if they're leaking and using progressively more and more until your shit crashes.

>>58390048
>czech

>>58389971
>16 processes

Doing practically nothing, nearly all system services disabled. Just a desktop with icons at this point.

Good job retard.

File: f8085ae5-0bfb-4c91-a15a-f4d25b958c86..png (60KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 1920x1080px

it's rough

File: loser.png (39KB, 710x697px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 710x697px

I lose pretty badly

>>58391741
How is that even possible?

>>58391767
What do you mean? Half of my RAM being used? That's actually pretty low, it goes as high as 90% usage.

>>58386408
Unused ram is wasted ram means overall you fucking faggot. Learn more then begin posting here.
It means if your OS is NOT using ram to cache programS (not 1 shitty program using all your ram) then those programs are cached and the ram is "used" but can be freed to use by another process at any time thus it is inefficient for an OS to waste any ram after its ram worth of programs have been loaded you fucking retard.