What do you guys think of pascal?
>>58360604
Used it back in the 80s. Not as flexible as C. File I/O was especially inflexible.
>>58360604
I had a semester. I don't remember any of it.
>>58360604
DOA
http://lazarus-ide.org/
>>58360604
It's fine
Lazarus IDE is great
http://wiki.freepascal.org/Platform_list#Supported_architectures
It's a dead language that only a complete retard would still use.
>>58363960
>Lazarus IDE is great
It looks pretty nice from what I've seen. Is there only one compiler for linux? fpc is all I find in my repos
>>58360604
I used "turbo" Pascal for AP Computer Science in high school (Early 90s). And had a semester of it in college.
I remember nothing about it other than it was the first language where I used functions.
>>58364932
Well, technically there's GPC (but it's dogshit) and LLVM-Pascal (which is still Alpha), so the only viable solution really is FPC.
My very brief exposure to it tells me that it's a shit language.
>>58360604
I use Ada, a Pascal descendant.
>>58360604
>>58368139
fucking kek
>>58360604
who's dis fine lady
>>58369879
It's your mom, brotha!
I think the 1060 performs well, but the the whole 10X0 series seems overpriced.