Why?

>>58359466
Because

Reminder that Assange is dead and Wikileaks is compromised

>>58359483
proofs?

transparency

>>58359491

That's not how burden of proof works. After his disappearance there hasn't been a proof of life.

>>58359483
they are pretty good at faking interviews then

>>58359466
everyone with a verified twitter account is a high-profile jew

>>58359466
Sieve out trolls/neonazis/alt-righters/stalkers in my opinion.

>>58359508
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dg6gu3qY7rA
wot about this?

Really what would be the goal here?

>>58359590
Are posts by verified twitter accounts ever used as sources?

Maybe trying to see if they have any agendas

They're a bunch of fucking losers with nothing better to do because they have no life.

>>58359590
weed out shills and special psy/info ops operatives

>>58359508
>That's not how burden of proof works. After his disappearance there hasn't been a proof of life.
That's not how burden of proof works. After making the factual statement; "Assange is dead", it is incumbent upon you to provide evidence to this effect.

Who fucking cares.

>>58359663
No, the burden is on the person making the claim of existence. Prove Assuage exists.

>>58359679
You cared enough to post

>>58359697
His interview from the 3rd

>>58359716
Prove the 3rd existed.

File: 1350493829929.jpg (16KB, 295x300px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 295x300px

These are all things responsible journalists normally disclose.

Do not let the era of the likes of Carlos Slim, Jeff Bezos using historic newspapers as their personal blogs distract you - that is not journalism, and neither are the modern day tabloid writers (bloggers).
Especially not in the world of "tech journalism", the most corrupt cesspit of them all.

@58359731 (You)
:^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^)

>>58359663

>being so uninformed that you shill for free
>implying that you're not actually CIA

>>58359583

>a video being proof of anything

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohmajJTcpNk

This is what you can do with commercially available stuff and 120 minutes setting it up. That's why Assagne himself said that 'the only valid proof of life is either the right cryptographic signature or showing up at the window', but neither of those have happened, even though they would take just a minute and cost nothing. Instead they made a poll to see what kind of proof of life people wanted, and when the window thing won the poll they decided to ignore it and show up a timestamped picture instead, which later was discovered to actually be a 3 year old picture with an edited timestamp.

To this day they still use the official account to tell people to "stop asking for a proof of life", but none of the posts have been signed with the right signature since months ago and nobody has any explanations to it. How dumb are you to not realize that he's dead since months ago?

>>58359736
Most verified users are just musicians or entertainers

Seems like a dick move to plaster their information all over the net

File: hurrr.jpg (32KB, 322x313px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 322x313px

>>58359710
wow what a clever and insightful post XD

>>58359772
I'm pretty sure they meant verified journalists, there's no reason for the rest

>>58359775
You'll be leaving now

>>58359466
Because they are fucking awful people.

>>58359466
would be interesting to see how they are related. it would prove your either are one of (((them))) or just not.

File: 1169673661707.jpg (33KB, 418x455px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 418x455px

Because there are many retarded fucking idiots whose skulls are filled with feces instead of brain matter;
and they openly and freely give out all their information and lay down all of their daily lives for exploitation by anyone who wants to.

>>58359466
because fuck yeahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

File: 208840_1.jpg (34KB, 630x630px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 630x630px

Why not? If retards make it possible to do such a thing, then why not just do it?

>>58359785
Kill yourself, shit for brains.

>>58359775
He's right though

>>58359663
>After making the factual statement; "Assange is dead",
That isn't a factual statement, moron. It's an assertion which purports to be factual.

However the burden of proof is on him, since there are regular interviews with Assange (and therefore eyewitnesses of his continued existence)

>>58359554
>assange gives specific dates into the "future" since his disappearance correlating with events actually happening

It's against the rules to troll outside of /b/ and /s4s/, you know.

File: 1479557139544.png (112KB, 1507x2552px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 1507x2552px

Remember pic related

>>58359508
>the lack of proof for A equals proof for B
get the fuck out

>>58360894
Thats just it though, we were assured by Assange himself that he would give periodic proof of life. This has not happened.

>>58361275
Why do you keep claiming he is dead? Do you secretly hope he is? Will it help your cause? Do you think an international assassin crept into the embassy and "eliminated him"?

>>58361456
That's a less ridiculous idea than you're thinking

>>58359731
Kill yourself.

>>58359508
>thats not how burden of proof works
Yes, it is you dumb cunt.

Lmao

This is literally no different to retarded conspiracies and is in no way objective.

My ancestry is linked to George, King of Britain, does that mean I'm involved in a royal conspiracy lmao?

>>58359590
bullshit filter

>>58362317
It would explain why you're in such a privileged position to be shitposting online. :)