>there will never be a Pentium 5 5ghz
why live?
what do you think of pentium D?
I remember those days when you just could ask 'what pentium do you have?'
>>58355447
legit
also the more mhz the better
now they just add more cores
its over
>>58355383
I had one of these back when they were the best I think like early 2002. Ran Lightwave like a champ
>>58354746
>tfw my 4790k is 5GHz @ 1.35V..
temps are as bad as thermi though, but it werks.
>>58355472
wiki say latest one was released in 2009... wtf
As a boy, I saw 3.5 MHz to about 3.5 GHz now.
So just with everything else in life, anything past the year 2000 is shit.
>>58356163
;_;_
I wonder if netburst will be revived when we have graphene chips