seems weirdly communistic
really makes me think
>>58338345
>appeals to a system that has never once worked
>meanwhile NVIDIA are being facists which has worked but its not exactly pleasant
I don't know which one is worse
>the gaming revolution will be streamed
ew
>>58338345
well software is one of the few places where communism can work, since information, once created, is not economically scarce, and can be duplicated at essentially zero cost.
>>58338345
>commies
>inefficient
>useful idiots
>unfulfilled big promises
>everyone's poor
Yep looks like AMD.
>>58338345
>>58338421
except it's about corps and open market, not government
>>58338345
Stallman would approve
>>58338487
>gnulag
I had a sensible chuckle
>>58338487
>wants freedom and lack of oversight so you think he would be a lolbertarian
>promotes democratic socialism which is authoritarian in nature
What did Stallman mean by this?
>>58338345
>communistic
>really makes me think
let me show you the way back: >>>/pol/
>>58338577
He's less anti-authoritarian than you imply though. He's just more of a vanilla leftist who wants/needs a strong government to enforce redistribution.
Eric S Raymond is the libertarian wing of free-software personalities.
>>58338577
>""""" freedom """""
Freedom can only extend so far anon, before another persons freedom is infringed. True freedom is to not be exploited or oppressed, and a government is needed to ensure this in theory
>>58338715
B-but muh NAP
>>58338345
>communistic
Illiteracy really makes me think.
>>58338345
>communistic
>>58338715
Ancap is retarded because it would inevitably end in two states--a Mad Max world (like Somalia today) or a world where megacorporations rule and are functionally governments motivated by profit.
>>58338345
>communistic
That is not a word in the English language.
>>58338893
You just described Brazil on that second.
>>58338799
>>58338832
>>58338907
100% sure about that?
>>58338893
Or you know, governments would develop as people seek to protect themselves with the cooperation of others, eventually resulting in power seekers manipulating others and eventually becoming kings.
Some kind of government would develop out of the anarchy because that's what happened last time.
>>58338976
I'm this guy >>58338799. I never said it isn't a real word. It's a real word but OP used it incorrectly.
He should have said 'seems weirdly communist'.
>>58338577
democratic socialists dont undetstand that liberalism and socialism is in conflict
>>58339386
this.
>>58339386
>>58339514
Liberalism is not anarchy.
Socialism is not strictly authoritarian.