Is this true?

>>58325893
Yes, the FSF is stupid enough to believe if a user needs a feature that they are capable of adding it themselves, have the time to do so, and should put it out for free.

>>58325976
>"gee it sure would be nice if this program had this feature, but I don't know how to do it myself"
>"good thing this is free software so that I can take it to whomever I want to add the feature without having to grovel at the mercy of the original developers"
>"and since I can take it to anyone I want, that encourages people to keep their price for services low, so I'm guaranteed to get a good, fair deal"

No, you colossal fucking retard.

>>58326070
>Need a feature
>Better go contract someone, and wait for them to be done, because nothing I do is important enough to be time sensitive, in my little basement

l o l

>FSF horribly giant nose, shit tier CRT, computer under desk
>Pirate has clearly higher quality system, does not require optical correction for his shit tier genetics, does not wear a belt at home like a fucking retard
Definitely Correct

>working for free

>>58326121
Also
>FSF cuck has literally no chin
>Pirate could cameo in a live action Chin Man movie

>>58326120
>Need a feature
>Better hope the next version will have it, and that my current version which lacks this feature will make me enough money before that point to where I will afford it

l o l

the FSF would not be happy about that image you've posted...

https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.en.html#Piracy

>>58326237
fuck you

>>58326347
okay