How can Mediatek even compete?

>>58314114
More cores.

Is that even a question?

File: slides3-14.jpg (68KB, 602x339px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 602x339px

Freesync/g-sync for mobile!

>>58314114
PSA
S
A

Never buy first gen Qualcomm CPU, they always revise it 6 months later.

File: 1477452611921.jpg (486KB, 1000x1426px) Image search: [Google]

486KB, 1000x1426px

>>58314114

File: 463a4d029c662dfd13a71e1528b42607_XL.jpg (201KB, 750x563px) Image search: [Google]

201KB, 750x563px

>>58314122
You're not even memeing.

>>58314199
so they've been copying notes from AMD

File: 1470851874639.gif (259KB, 567x522px) Image search: [Google]

259KB, 567x522px

>SoC reduces power consumption
>Device manufacturers reduce the battery size so you get the same or worse battery life because le thin meme

>>58314199
Of course I'm not.

>>58314114
>How can Mediatek even compete?
By providing 10% less performance for 60% less price

>>58315005
this

>>58314199
Mediatek is literally AMD of ARM.

>>58314114
>Larger batteries
thinner phones*

>>58314237
Android batteries are on average stable in flagships
The problem is they keep increasing the screen resolution.
I dont understand why, 1080p is sharp as hell up to 7 inches.

>>58315039
Agreed. Both lack drivers.

>>58314122
we have already seen where this leads to

>>58315564
>The problem is they keep increasing the screen resolution.
They mostly haven't touched resolution in a few generations now.
1080 and 1440 are the norm with a couple of 4k outliers.

Qualcomm is okay but who the fuck decided to name their chip snapdragon?

>>58316969
somewhat sure snapdragons were bought from amd back in the day.

>>58314228
>AMD
wat
my Xeon has more cores then any AMD

Qualcomms biggest weakness is they are to arrogant to sell chips to small companies. By ignoring TV boxes, chromebooks and SBC devices and others they leave room for others to grow.