Will AMD ever be able to compete with Intel?
>>58261004
10 lvl100 machop's would still wreck 4 lvl100 machamps.
>>58261042
>>58261056
>>58261065
fuck your mothers
i love the lack of research here by whoever made that image, couldn't name any AMD product lines and implied 10c/10t with the imagery when more appropo would have been 4 somewhat smaller bodied Machamp's but with somewhat bigger arms to signify AMD's better version of SMT but overall weaker cores.
oh well, shitposters.
>>58261117
they even got the intel cpus wrong, but you can only expect so much when you outsource shilling to 3rd world
>>58261091
>being this new
>>58261099
checked
>>58261178
what's wrong with the intel cpu's?
>inb4 pointing out their bullshit laptop/tablet product lineup
Fixed
>>58261117
Thats just the best AMD processor
>>58261205
Fixed 2.0
>>58261004
They already do, just not in all market segments.
>>58262782
Perfect.
>>58261004
>Intel shills in a hurry to flood the web with old comparisons quickly before Zen gets out
I bet you lose your job in a month
>>58261004
I hope so. I'd like people just to go out and buy AMD shit just to give them a chance; maybe we could create meme magic and make is so.
Zen
>>58261004
fixed
>>58261084
But you're only allowed to use 6 of them.
So an i5 is just a quadcore Pentium while an i3 is a dualcore i7?
>>58263504
Not with DX12
>>58264400
i3s and i7s have hyperthreading, i5s and current pentiums dont
>>58263427
Rather support Jews than Terrorists.
>>58262782
kek
>>58262943
I want them to do well just to see Intel's monopoly break. I'm sick of their backdoor'd CPUs and competition drives innovation anyway.
>>58264572
Name one single problem that has come up (that could apply to you specifically) from Intel management shit, which has been in place since ivy bridge
>>58264572
Intel doesn't have a monopoly, Qualcomm moves more units than they do.