post benchmarks

>>58243228
is there a portable version of this shit?

File: r.png (9KB, 363x170px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 363x170px

>>58243228

>>58243335
like, laptop or mobile?
what do you mean

>>58243396
whats the single like anon

>>58243421
Single core? It's a Haswell CPU at 2GHz. Exactly half of the single core perf. of a haswell/broadwell at 4GHz.

post benchmarks you fags
i know a bunch of you NEETs are lurking

>>58243791
No reason for me to bench a Celeron G1840, but tomorrow my i5 4590 will arrive (even dough it was supposed to arrive yesterday), so if this thread will still be up I will.

>>58243850
Are you not interested in how a Celergon G1840 performs? Cuz I sure am. I didn't even know that processor exists.

>>58243791
Don't want to install some proprietary Windows only shit just to see how fast my processor is.

File: CeleronBaseline.png (92KB, 401x2572px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 401x2572px

>>58243880
I have this benchmark.....

File: 2gkyZXy.png (30KB, 298x582px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 298x582px

>>58243228
4.6GHz

>>58243923
>>58243228
my 4770k is at 4.6 and btfos your haslel refresh
did you have some background shit running?

File: cine.png (31KB, 301x668px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 301x668px

here

File: cuckbench.png (45KB, 306x633px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 306x633px

>>58243850

>>58243964
no, idk whats going on lol

>>58244051
what's the boost on that?
apparently 5820k > 6800k
performance is pretty much the same but 5820k OC better

>>58244159
It has a measly 4 Ghz OC because I couldn't be arsed to fiddle with it more.

File: Cinebench 4-2ghz.png (33KB, 501x601px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 501x601px

>>58243398
Doesn't need to be installed

FX 8 core still going strong

File: Cinebench AMD A4-1200.png (1MB, 1363x715px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1363x715px

>>58244106
GET ON MY LEVEL, 1GHZ AMD DUAL CORE, 4W CPU

>>58244212
That's actually disgusting.

>>58244212
how long did it run?

File: Cinebench.jpg (550KB, 1222x749px) Image search: [Google]

550KB, 1222x749px

Running at 4.2Ghz

>>58243335
This, someone link to portable version plzkthx

Benchmarks like this aren't really a good indicator of perofrmance that you can expect from a system, becuase they are more likely to be 'embarrasingly parallel'

>>58245441
It's a reasonable way to compare various CPUs' ability to render an image

There's also fun to be had like video related 9:00
https://youtu.be/0OKRf35O4qU?t=536

File: MyCinebenchR15.jpg (96KB, 379x1005px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 379x1005px

getting old over here

File: Cinebench R15.png (31KB, 371x723px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 371x723px

4770K 4.4ghz

>>58245569

That CPU is still holding up surprisingly well.

When I get home, I'm going to make this thread look like a fucking joke.

File: cinebenchFinalMAX.png (28KB, 324x838px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 324x838px

>>58244193
Fucking hello.

File: bench01.png (1MB, 1920x1040px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1040px

JUST

File: CinebenchR15.png (14KB, 497x231px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 497x231px

>>58244159
it comes down to your chip and your motherboard.

6800k and 5820k readily trade blows once overclocked depending on your particular chip.

My 5820k can hit 4.7GHz stable with only 1.33v, so I could probably beat the average 6800k in a direct head to head. But for my 24/7 OC i keep it between 4.1 and 4.3Ghz

>>58248767
>24/7 OC
Fucking pussy.

File: [email protected] (87KB, 504x587px)

87KB, 504x587px

>>58248833
Meh, if I need the performance it's a simple restart away, I have a BIOS switch, first BIOS is 4.2GHz, 2nd BIOS is 4.6GHz (though I have tested 4.7GHz)

File: i5_6400_45ghz.png (27KB, 316x598px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 316x598px

>>58243228