no time for love speccy thread

Theres already a speccy thread on the front page

>>58223387
>shit cheap monitors
>shit 980. The ti redeemed itself.

File: Capture.png (44KB, 660x528px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 660x528px

overclocked xeon pls no hate

>>58224737
>Says overclocked
>Doesn't post CPU-Z
>Doesn't post any benchmarks

File: bench.png (15KB, 399x402px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 399x402px

>>58224755
here ya go its at 4.3GHz rn so dont hate

>>58224737
how do you a Xeon?

>>58225387
what?
how do i oc?
the first revision of my motherboard allows baseclock oc

File: IMG_20161224_202500.jpg (123KB, 1077x537px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 1077x537px

i3 stronk

File: .png (39KB, 701x558px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 701x558px

>>58223387
Laptop.

File: speccy.png (46KB, 811x623px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 811x623px

>>58223387
Please rate.

>>58225617
Nice povertyrig, not too many memes.
Unplug all your flashdrives.

File: Winter, Animation.gif (839KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

839KB, 800x600px

>>58225617
Aye, how much seperate storage devices do you want, completely pointless. You're like a verbose meme within speccy.

>>58225641
>>58225648
Kek, I use them as backup for programming shit mainly, whenever I make a change on my main drive it gets backed up to my main flash drive too.

File: Capture.png (33KB, 707x389px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 707x389px

Save my little ass for daddy later please.

>>58225683
My cpu is actually running at 69 c, but whenever i load up speccy it always climbs like that.

>>58225696
69 is hardly acceptable either m8. Sort it out.

>>58225683
>>58225696
Jesus fucking christ, how has your home not burned down yet. You're using a fucking FM2+ processor or some shit with a GTX 960, enjoy every game you ever run being bottlenecked to shit, you total spasmoid.

File: Bildschirmfoto 2016-12-29 um 15.50.03.jpg (168KB, 1396x932px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 1396x932px

>>58223387
:D

>>58225878
nice processor lel. I can only imagine that thing grinding to a halt within the next 2 years being clocked so low

File: speccy.png (59KB, 806x678px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 806x678px

CPU is running at 4.7GHz. Kinda feeling the itch for a new one but it doesn't actually bottleneck in any game at 4K, so I don't really have a reason to switch.

>>58225920
I know but I don't even use it in any professional way.
Just a portable webmachine.

Had a Zenbook 13" with dual 1,2ghz and Windows 10 before. It did it's job aswell.

File: On Air.png (44KB, 966x756px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 966x756px

>>58225920
This is my workstation

File: Speccy.png (38KB, 684x553px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 684x553px

r8 m8s

>>58225482
What about if they release a CPU microcode update that can only be installed via a BIOS update that gives performance gains?

You're now forced to remain on that BIOS, or modify a later BIOS and hope you know enough to keep the OC functionality from the old version.


My 5820k got a CPU microcode update that boosted memory read/write speeds by a good 15-25%

>>58225977
>My 5820k
Should've gotten a Xeon E5-1650V3, multiplier unlocked Xeon.

>>58225998
>E5-1650V3
I got my 5820k for $290

find me a 1650v3 for less.

>>58224804
That isn't a xeon fool.

File: r8.png (36KB, 674x524px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 674x524px

rate

>>58226064
You might wanna upgrade your CPU
and your RAM
oh and your screen and your GPU

File: toaster.jpg (52KB, 665x477px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 665x477px

my gaming machine since 2009.
i think i should upgrade

>>58226094
I upgraded to my 5820k from a Q6600 and haven't looked back.

>>58226030
I'm not in the US so I don't know where to look, where I live I see them for <$300 pretty often, if you know where to look. Better binning, ECC support, more lanes than 5820k

>>58225949
a shitty portable web machine using year old, non energy efficient CPU architecture

>>58226135
>better binning
Dont be retarded anon, intel doesn't do shit for binning on such low end parts

also, ECC support for a home machine? kys


They're $550+ in the US, on ebay used ones go for $400+

>>58226176
They're clocked higher in the same power envelope. You can see it on ark.

>>58224737
Only love for you

File: CPU-Z.jpg (53KB, 402x400px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 402x400px

>>58226220
So fucking what? The 5820k hits 4.2GHz+ easy as fuck regardless

I'd be spending minimally $200+ more than my 5820k for a new one, for literally NOTHING.

I understand Xeons are "cool" because not everyone has one, but i'm not going to waste money on nothing.

>>58225946
How are you liking the GTX 1080s? I'm getting one soon and had a few questions if you're still around:

>How much difference does SLI make?
>Are you getting steady 60 fps at 4k?
>How do you go about plugging in all the monitors? DisplayPort? HDMI? DVI?
>I'm buying a DisplayPort only 144hz monitor. Will it run smoothly are 144hz when plugged into a 1080?

>>58226254
4.2GHz really isn't that much for Haswell

File: [email protected] (79KB, 383x373px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 383x373px

>>58226379
Yes I know

>>58226264
They're good. I got Gigabyte 1080 G1s, mostly due to availability, I got them close to release and this was what I could find that wasn't extremely overpriced. Mine don't OC extremely well, they top out at ~2050MHz maybe, you might get another 100MHz or some shit out of 1080s sometimes, whether I got unlucky or it's because of the power limit I've no idea. Still, an extre <5% clock isn't going to do much if anything in practice and I'm glad I didn't buy EVGAs with no VRM cooling.
>How much difference does SLI make?
Depends on the game. Some aren't supported, others scale like 90%. People don't know and/or don't want to believe this but at 4K having both cards at x16/x16 PCIe 3.0 actually makes a difference. I've seen like 15% better performance in x16/x16 vs. x8/x8, in TW3 with TAA for instance. In any case, if you're looking for 60FPS and 4K 1080SLI is the cheapest option (Titan XP SLI is ridiculously expensive)
>Are you getting steady 60 fps at 4k?
Most of the time, yes, at maxed or close to maxed settings, not much AA though. Some games bottleneck hard on CPU though, not in the sense that a 4790K is shit but TW:WH for instance runs a single thread at 100% and when you get to battles with 5000+ units and projectiles flying all over the place it can't keep up. Some are also just unoptimized, like Dishonored 2 (although it runs at 60+ FPS most of the time, in most levels)
>How do you go about plugging in all the monitors? DisplayPort? HDMI? DVI?
ZR24w: DVI
27MU67: HDMI 2.0
U2713HM: DP
I don't like DP because Windows is ""smart"" and removes monitors entirely when they're turned off. This completely fucks desktop icons and window positioning and I sometimes remote into my computer with monitors turned off. The Dell doesn't do this, so it's on DP.
>I'm buying a DisplayPort only 144hz monitor. Will it run smoothly are 144hz when plugged into a 1080?
I assume so, I've got a friend with a 2560x1440 144Hz monitor on a 1080, it runs fins as far as I know.

>>58226254
>>58226379
Core clock is pointless now-a-days anyways. The real bottle neck is RAM. The big advantage of even low end core 4/8 thread Xeon E5's is the quad channel memory.

For the higher order Xeon's (like the 6/12, 10/20) you get 10MB+ more L3 cache. Ofc you lose ~1-1.5GHz of max clock. But you'll waste those cycles waiting for memory access anyways.

>>58226669
I've got my 5820k paired with 3200MHz DDR4 in quad channel.

15MB L3 cache isn't too bad either.

>>58226669
I think that really depends on the workload, if it's running video games core clock is king.

>>58225977
Salty Lake BCLK overclocker here to answer your question!

If Kaby Meme is good enough to make me upgrade my CPU then I'd have to install a BIOS update, but if Kaby Meme was that good I would be getting a nice performance jump anyways. Same for Coffee Lake or whatever they're calling their "oops we fucked up the 10nm process so it's only going in laptops, have another revision" line

>>58226169
> battery lasts easily 13 hours
> muh engery efficiency

kys

File: Untitled.png (55KB, 815x519px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 815x519px

be gentle

File: speccy.png (31KB, 643x429px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 643x429px

Chinkpad, rate pls

>>58226949
Isn't the thing coming out after Kaby supposed to have 6 core "mainstream" i7s? That's going to be fairly significant even if it's 14nm, especially if it can clock like Kaby with adequate cooling.

>>58223387

always time for love

Still good for a 6 year old machine?

>>58228208

lookin good 10/10

>>58228208
10/10