>he doesnt use inline assembly

>>58195973
i used to do this years ago, but now i actually can't find a reason to justify it. why would you use inline assembly ? using compiler specific features is just bad coding style

>>58195973
what's that

>>58195973
>he makes garbage threads with no substance

>>58195973
>He pick an image that would perfectly line up with the 4chan santa hat

>>58195973
>retarded anime poster

>>58195973
what kind of situation would you need to inline assembly

File: Girls.png (490KB, 449x401px) Image search: [Google]

490KB, 449x401px

>he uses a sissy high level language

>>58197881
very specific cases.
writing an embedded application
not using libc (you'd have to issue system calls directly).
A virus or worm is usually the case for the last one.

>>58195973
tomato

File: shamefull.png (156KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 800x800px

>>58195973
>He doesn't just use assembly instead of shitty languages.

File: trump-walking.png (228KB, 544x967px) Image search: [Google]

228KB, 544x967px

>He thinks he can program

>>58195973
>he doesn't move his assembly routines to a separate file instead of abusing compiler-specific macro tricks
die

>He doesn't have custom ASICs for each task
It's like you want your computer to be inefficient

>>58198540
>Having an ASIC for each task
It's like you want to ramp up the cost of everything

>>58198951
poorfags go away

>>58197881
Bootloader
Kernel

>Not writing C# to write inline Python to write inline C to write inline assembly
Do you even meta

>>58195973
>He doesn't write all of his software in assembly entirely