is tumbleweed usable?

Define "usable"

Yes, but it's rather high-maintenence. Packages sometimes don't upgrade right so you need to go in and fix that. But otherwise it works well.

>>58195972
All the packages of OpenSUSE
All the stability of Arch

>>58196168
How often does this happen?

I haven't had any problems so far with updating/upgrading but, then again, I've been using it for all of two weeks now, so that's hardly a good indicator.

File: Screenshot from 2016-12-27 22-03-32.png (142KB, 1760x706px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 1760x706px

>>58195972
Yeah, but arch is better packages-wise, imo.

>>58195992
can it even?

>>58196277
What terminal are you using?

>>58196445
Gnome-terminal. I prefer KDE myself, but I want to use wayland.

File: VirtualBox_Ubuntu-16.04-LTS-Desktop_07_07_2016_14_50_37.png (408KB, 1366x695px) Image search: [Google]

408KB, 1366x695px

>>58196464
KDE terminal is shit

>>58196552
It's not nearly as shit as it used to be.

It's Linux, so no.

>>58196248
Once QT couldn't update because some old library was installed. Once KDE broken entirely. Once my GPU acceleration got disabled and I had to reinstall it. This was all over about a year and a half. So not too often, but often enough to keep you on your toes.

>>58196552
Correction

*Linux is shit