if (foo) return false; else return true;

>>58106114
>

if (POO)
   return false;
else
   return true;

>>58106114
return foo == false;

File: at_least_you_tried.jpg (99KB, 588x546px)

99KB, 588x546px

>>58106134

>>58106134
return !foo;

>>58106114

return !foo;

>>58106114
if (foo)
Printf("poo in the loo") ;
return false;
else
Printf("OP is a fag") ;
return true;

>>58106114
<code>
if (foo)
return !foo;
else
return foo;
<code>

File: bfdghf.jpg (17KB, 367x388px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 367x388px

>>58106184
>no scope
>upper case printf
>lacking indent
Do you even program

>>58106114

try
{
    if (foo == true)
    {
        return new Boolean(false);
    }
    else if (foo == false)
    {
        return new Boolean(true);
    }
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
    ex.printStackTrace();
    System.exit(1);
}

File: hp.jpg (539KB, 1063x657px) Image search: [Google]

539KB, 1063x657px

>>58106243

>>58106192
>using the carat tag block

>>58106265
I've come up with a better one:

private static Boolean reverseTruthValueOfBoolean(Boolean foo) throws Exception {
    Boolean theValueToBeReturnedFromThisMethod = null;

    try
    {
        if (foo.equals(Boolean.TRUE) == true)
        {
            theValueToBeReturnedFromThisMethod = new Boolean(false);
        }
        else if (foo.equals(Boolean.FALSE) == true)
        {
            theValueToBeReturnedFromThisMethod = new Boolean(true);
        }
        else
        {
            throw new NullPointerException();
        }
    }
    catch (Exception ex)
    {
        throw ex;
    }
    finally
    {
        return theValueToBeReturnedFromThisMethod;
    }
}

File: tumblr_mzaabzkFb21smcbm7o1_250.gif (967KB, 245x245px)

967KB, 245x245px

>>58106114
I've actually had a manager that would bitch to me if I had written "return !foo;" in this case, because that would have been too obfuscated and code is meant to be read by other people and yadda yadda. Fuck that.

>>58106353
you should have

...
BooleanFactory booleans = new BooleanFactory(BooleanFactory.PRIMITIVE_BOOLEANS);
...
BooleanFactory.makeTrue()
...
BooleanFactory.makeFalse()

instead

>>58106373

Trinary, GOML

return foo ? false : true;

>>58106373
oops, has to be "booleans.make..." of course

File: 56520055.jpg (119KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 400x400px

>>58106360
I expect "other people" to be able to understand a simple boolean negation.
If they can't I'm clearly in a company run by baboons

>>58106373
I can think of lots of things to do to make that code even more like idiomatic Java, but I really can't be fucked typing out that much code.

>>58106383
thank god, you made a factory.

can you cache a singleton instance of the wrapped holder so that we can have multiple contexts without recreating the underlying dataset? i think that would perform much better and make a lot of pattern fags happy.