So visiting my sister in Brit-Bong Island, went to watch some

File: cHdLEiZyPuByuzP124lEwGdkDPQMwfYLFRnSjTU0YW0.jpg (18KB, 320x323px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 320x323px

>>58097219
who thinks these flags are designed to erode the strength of simplicity in the original statement? there are no redundant words in "don't tread on me" which is elegant. are we being trodden on by a ((memetic)) attack boys?

>>58097219
>Will things become like this in the US when trump does away with Net Neutrality?
yeah, duh

I still can't fathom how anyone could possibly be against rules that forbid ISPs from hindering you in consuming whatever network usage they deem bad. I mean wtf. That's like if tomorrow people voted the red cross should be forced to drop its stance of neutrality and just ignore one side or the other when they help in warzones. Only executive pricks looking to make a buck profit from that, nobody else.

You're full of shit OP, no UK ISP does that.

>>58097372
I think it's cute that's why I saved it calm down

File: netneutrality-june2016[1].jpg (46KB, 640x400px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 640x400px

>>58097375
PS
meanwhile in for once glorious EU: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/open-internet-net-neutrality

net neutrality is an EU law

muricucks will never know the feeling of having a government that at least on occasion does something in the interest of its people

File: image.png (159KB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 750x1334px

>>58097393

>>58097442
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/david-cameron/11960351/David-Cameron-Porn-filters-will-stay-despite-EU-ruling-threatening-protections.html

>>58097219
Why is britain the only country in the west that actually forces people to follow the "you have to be 18 to watch porn" laws?

>>58097476
yeah well those sheep fuckers have always had a problem adjusting to the community they migrate into

>>58097478
Because forcing everyone to do so is violating what I consider to be digital information rights. 70% of households in the UK don't have children. 90% of the households with children say they personally control thier child internet usage.

>>58097447
That's a mobile provider, not an ISP. Log into your EE account, check the unlock content box, problem solved.

>>58097219
is this for real? I live in the UK and have never in my life come across any such block

>>58097540
I don't have an EE account, also with the push for a completely mobile centered web infrastructure you don't think this will be a problem?

>>58097510
Then they should make porn legal for everyone.

>>58097219
Why are you watching porn with your sister?

>>58097563
Then ask whoever owns the connection to do it for you.

>>58097219
>visiting sis
>watching porn during said visit
>not simply fucking your sister
scrub

>>58097619
This. OP doesn't your sister have WiFi you can connect to?

Alternatively, stop being a fucking degenerate.

Resorting to watching hentai on Newgrounds. What am I, 10?

>>58097375
They make the market less free.

>>58097832
Which is literally something only greedy pricks in executive position who care for nothing but their wallet want.

>>58097832
Fuck that it makes people more free

>>58098096
in what possible way does it, hm? How does allowing corporations to block and throttle your traffic at their whim make you more free? Fucking deluded americans, don't even understand an opponent being forced to be neutral instead is a good thing

>>58098140
Misunderstanding, I meant the opposite of course

>>58097219
No, you fucking retard.