Name a torrent client better than uTorrent 2.2.1.
>>58062822
Transmission, but only if you're using GNU/Linux.
For Windows, uTorrent 2.2.1 is still the best.
>>58062850
fpbp
>>58062850
So what about 2.2.1 vs Transmission? Which one is better?
I really like rtorrent/rutorrent, but that's only on a server, not locally.
>>58062894
Not him but transmission
>>58062822
Windows
>Deluge
>Qbittorrent
>Transmission
>Tixati (banned usually)
Linux
>Qbit
>Transmission
>>58062850
what
Transmission-Qt on Windows is great
>>58062850
Bullshit, Transmission-QT kicks uTorrents ass.
CLI:
>rtorrent
>lftp (sometimes)
If I feel like using some fancy GUI:
>Deluge
>Transmission
I remember uTorrent was very nice before they had the paid version.
However, if you keep using the old version you miss out of newer features of the torrent protocol like mutable torrents.
>2000 + 18 - 2
>not being qBittorrent v3.2.1 masterrace
you what now?
>>58062822
aria2
>>58062822
µtTorrent 2.0.4
I have over 1100 torrents in my uTorrent. But i want to try other programs to see how they work compared, but I don't know how to transfer all of them. Or if I can at all
>>58062822
Picotorrent.
What's the actual difference between qBittorrent and every single torrent client that's not an ad-infested shitstain like uTorrent?
Seriously, not baiting here, in terms of functionality I see no difference between Deluge, Transmission, qBittorrent, rTorrent, etc.
How retarded am I to not see a difference?
>>58063376
The only difference at least for me off and on was if socks proxy worked on certain versions. Pretty sure it works on Qbit and Deluge now. Recall using Deluge for awhile because Qbit or was it Transmission had some issues with socks.
>>58063537
Yeah, that makes sense. #WhateverWorks
>>58063376
Most of the time it seems to just be the minimalism or customizability of the UI
Deluge on win/lin/mac.
Transmission or rtorrent in CLI.
Tixati ... free ads
>>58062822
>>58062822
uTorrent 3.4.9 (build 42606) [32-bit]
Ktorrent