qBittorrent 3.3.10 is out with official 64 bit version. Bye bye

File: 1387508713247.gif (2MB, 368x275px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 368x275px

>>58055020
It's been 10 years and the devs have still not fixed the stalled bug.

>>58055043
ok

>>58055043
my torrents have literally never stalled once

10 years and you haven't fixed the stall meme

>>58055043
the fuck is he talking about?

File: 1481707307768.png (122KB, 1201x2006px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 1201x2006px

>>58055243
>meme

The update process needs some improvements, for fuck's sake. It's annoying to find out there's a new update every time I start a torrent. If I start a torrent, I'm not partial to waiting to install the update. These last few days have really highlighted how asinine that is.

>>58055642
They will someday do an auto update.

File: Untitled.png (59KB, 315x338px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 315x338px

>3 updates in 2 days
This is why I use a client that got it right 5 years ago.
qBittorrent has now been out for 10 years and they still can't get it right. How incompetent can one dev team be?

>>58055700
enjoy your rootkits

>>58055793
391k vs 16MB of botnet. Though the qBittorrent botnet would probably sit there STALLED.

>>58055818
>open source
>botnet

ok enjoy your rootkits, gaymer

>>58055830
3.3.8

>>58055909
False positive. Nice try, nigger.

>>58055925
>emergency patch released within hours
>false clean sample uploaded to virustotal

>>58055243
I used to not believe in the stalled meme, but then I upgraded to 3.3 and all of my torrents stalled.

They'd work in every other torrent client.

File: transmission.png (149KB, 1418x805px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 1418x805px

>Bothering with qBittorrent or libtorrent-rasterbar programs

I switched to Transmission and never looked back.

>>58055568


I know right???????????

Stalled??? What does that mean?????

>>58055818
µTorrent 2.2.1 has numerous security vulnerabilities that were fixed in subsequent verions. You are willingly using outdated, insecure software. You're also using a version of the client released post-buyout.

>>58056110
it doesnt support proxies anymore

>>58056128
>it's old so it must be insecure!
391k.

>>58056128
>µTorrent 2.2.1 has numerous security vulnerabilities
>i'm not gonna list them but trust me

sure kid

>>58055020
It's a torrent client. Why does it matter if it's 32 or 64 bit?

>>58056050
>false clean sample uploaded to virustotal
You posted this on the other thread as well. I hope so much you are trolling that I'm even giving you the big (YOU) that you wanted.

Enjoy it, you deserve it.

>>58055700
lol

>>58056276
You have no idea what is contained within those 391KB, especially since BitTorrent, Inc. has ties to the MPAA and RIAA. You do realize µTorrent was bought out prior to 1.7, right? Anything after 1.7 can't be trusted, and using software that's both outdated and post-buyout isn't very smart from a security standpoint.

>>58056338
The release notes are publicly available, but here you go, the release notes for 3.0:

https://forum.utorrent.com/topic/70656-%C2%B5torrent-30-32-bit-stable-release/

I like this client

>>58055020

>However, you might experience increased memory usage due to this.

Increased memory usage on the only client that actually stalls torrent.

No thanks.

>>58055700
>This is why I use a client that got it right 5 years ago.
But anon, µBotnet can sometimes have 3 updates in a single day. New minor builds with nothing changed besides different ads.
Just because you decided to stick with an old version doesn't change that fact.
You are free to stick with any old version of qBittorrent and disable updates there too.

>>58057311

>use torrent client that never has any problems
or
>use bloated client that stalls your torrent

what did he mean by this?

Any reason I should switch from Deluge to qBt?

>>58057358

Yes, you get the stall feature.

>>58057358
>I'm jealous that qBittorrent gets all these updates and Deluge gets nothing

Any benefit to using the 64 bit version instead of the 32 bit?

Deluge is good.

>>58057445
Users say its much better for heavy torrenting

https://qbforums.shiki.hu/index.php/topic,1645.270.html

>>58055020
>qBittorrent 3.3.10
16MB
>utorrent 221
350KB

>both do exactly the same things

>>58057677

uhh, it's open-source, that means it must be 50 times larger and stall torrents for it to perform the same

>>58057677
Except qBittorrent will support any future advancements in the Bittorrent protocol and actually receives security updates, which utorrent 2.2.1 never will.

>>58057677
Qbittorrent is cross platform and uses Qt.

utorrent only has to use the winapi.

(you)

>>58057827
>future advancements in the Bittorrent protocol
What advancements are that,?
There haven't been any for 10 years!
We all know about the security memes.

People who cling to uTorrent 2.2.1 are the same fags who cling to VLC and Opera. Technology moves on ya dinguses.

>>58057866
µTP may be 10 years old, but it wasn't added to utorrent until two years after utorrent was bought out and it came into existence. Magnet link support wasn't added until 2008, two years after the buyout.

Just because there has been no new development in the past 10 years doesn't mean there never will be new development. At that time, utorrent 2.2.1 will not support that development.

>>58057909

What?

Give me one reason outside of "security" memes to upgrade from utorrent 2.2.1

>>58057943
They aren't memes. There's a link further up in the thread to the changelog for 3.0, the first version after 2.2.1. Fucking read it and learn about shit that will NEVER get fixed due to your refusal to upgrade.

>>58055043
the fuck are you talking about? i've been using qb for years and never seen this. Try actually using it instead of repeating what other people say.

>>58055020
I'll switch to qb immediately as they fix this shitty design.

File: 1481971463750.jpg (1MB, 2362x3544px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2362x3544px

>>58055568
>>58056115
its a joke I think
when you get torrent that has no seeds/peers
it does not move and label it gets is stalled

considering I never had it in 3 years of use in torrents that had peers/seeds, I expect that its a joke.. like saying that amd has no drivers

>>58057939
>µTP
Is shit.
It's meant to throttle your download speed in order to avoid network congestion, meaning so other people on the network don't get shitty speeds while you download which is total CRAP.
1ST THING i DISABLE AFTER FRESH INSTALL.
Utp was a step back not an advancement.

>>58057854
>qbloat

>>58057677
>both do exactly the same things

qBittorrent actually does more than uTorrent 2.2.1 and that is a fact. It's only the lack of native code that makes qBittorrent bigger, really.

>>58058018
>more
MORE WHAT?!
Wtf ware you talking about?

>>58058030
Built in search, label support, tracker sorting, can create torrents with a bigger piece size, etc.

qBittorrent is far ahead of uTorrent 2.2.1 and you guys are only using it because you're dumb Winfags who have babby duck syndrome.

And I don't even use qBittorrent. I use Transmission on private trackers with my NAS.

File: qbittorrent.webm (647KB, 1071x778px) Image search: [Google]

647KB, 1071x778px

why I cant go back to shitty µtorrent
not to mention sequential downloading and preview

File: gallery_227361_1098_34024.jpg (138KB, 1152x1536px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 1152x1536px

>>58055020

glad i stopped using qbittorrent then

>>58058046
>Built in search, label support, tracker sorting, can create torrents with a bigger piece size, etc.

Sequential downloading + previewing a file while it downloads, a built-in webui, extended RSS support.

uTorrent 2.2.1 is literally 7 years old now. It's time to move on.

>ITT: uFaggots stuck in 2011
How's the Xbox 360 doing? Man I sure am excited for the first Captain America and Thor movies! OMG did you hear that they killed Bin Laden?!

File: 1480110711432.png (27KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 500x500px

>>58055043
>Stalled
Fuck I thought this was a joke, how do I fix it?

>>58058099
You can't.

>>58058099
>how do I fix it?
By not listening to shitty memes on /g/.

Been using qBittorrent for years now and have not seen the stalledmeme even once.

>>58058046
>Built in search for torrents in the client(ut3.0 has that and it's 1MB)

That's the only thing ut221 doesn't have.
I can tracker sort and create torrents with bigger pieces.

>>58058055
>sequential downloading and preview
Sequential downloading works BETTER in 221 than qbt+(smoother sequential downloading, not skipping so many pieces)
I don't have to manually choose to sequential download every torrent, it does that automatically, AND I get sequential files meaning that if I get a season It will download ep 1 in sequential order so I can start watching it right away! qbt does that?!
AGAIN ut 221 not the latest.
Also ut221 supports adding search engines from sites inside the client.

>>58058071
>a built-in webui, extended RSS support.
Whatever extended is suppose to mean... in 3.0 qbt rss was worse than ut221, idk what extended is suppose to mean since ut221 doesn't miss anything.
ut221 supports webui

>>58055020
should I switch to 64-bit? what would be the benefit? it should only matter if I have like three-fiddy torrents up, right?

File: ie.jpg (37KB, 1008x276px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 1008x276px

Which one of you did it?

>>58058230
Pretty much. It's more stable for people who actually seed.

>>58058239
Me

>>58057959
But they are you turbofaggot.
Your vulnerabilities have been showed numerous times on this very board to be at worst inconsequential.

>>58058262
f-ck off, I seed. but I only have 10-15 torrents up at a time.

>>58058350
>he doesn't actually seed

File: seedmaster.png (3KB, 133x70px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 133x70px

>>58058355
b-back off

>tfw no transmission for windows

>>58058433
there is but it's shitty

>>58058433
Transmission-qt works fine on Windows.

File: wowza.jpg (17KB, 319x265px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 319x265px

>>58058386

>>58057909
what's wrong with vlc then?
also
captcha: street calle
does this mean I'm pitbull now?

File: thisisfine.gif (237KB, 276x268px) Image search: [Google]

237KB, 276x268px

Two words:
Transmission QT

>>58058706

QT is not a word

Why do these threads exist? Why is a hotfix news worthy? Why would I use a client that needs to update every time I use it?

>>58058706
>not GTK

>>58058758
>a client that needs to update every time I use it?

this doesn't happen, anon

qbittorrent doesn't seed properly. The upload speed is waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too low for some reason. Didn't have the problem in utorrent and I love to seed. Can't seem to be able to fix it and there's no upload speed limit. Does this update address this maybe? Downloading now anyway

>>58055020
O-Ok why would I bother with the 64bit version if the same fixes etc./same code is present in the 32bit version? Do people like increased memory usage?

>>58058820
It's more stable for people who seed many torrents.

>>58058798
um, works fine for me, sir...

UI update when? it's bumfuck 2003-tier ugly

File: qb_2.png (16KB, 289x433px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 289x433px

>>58055043
works on my machine

>>58058936
>Alltime

Have you been using it for one week?

t. first worlder

>>58059006
ugh, are you kidding me?

>not having 2000k TB downloaded
>not having 50000k TB uploaded
>2216

t. neo worlder

>>58057971
Make a torrent DHT, EX, etc.., then copy magnet link, post it here, watch how much time it takes for anyone to connect to it or even get the metadata.

>>58059006
inb4 you're actually from the US.

Pass.

>>58059179
wat

>>58059607
Make a torrent, and share the magnet link, it'll take hours for people to start downloading anything from it because qBittorent has a stalling problem.

File: 1481909455249.jpg (30KB, 674x433px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 674x433px

>>58059726
It may have stalling problems, but uT has built in Tetris (hit T in the about screen) so there's that

>>58055043
Go away with your FUD, utorrent shill. Your torrent client is dying, accept it.

>>58060306
>implying a uTorrent shill would shill some ancient version of the software instead of the current edition

>>58060387
Everyone knows that 2.2.1 is the preferred version. If you're going to get someone to use your software, it's better they're using an older version than a competitors software. It's like what microsoft said about piracy, if they're going to pirate something it's better they pirated your software.

>>58060409
>Everyone knows that 2.2.1 is the preferred version.

no

>>58055043
Don't forget about it deleting and rechecking entire torrents on each startup if they are few hundred GBs in size, which is pretty standard for RAW bluray collections or TLMC

>>58057986
>he thinks that there are only peers when STALLEDtorrent connects, and that it not connecting means there aren't any.
It's called STALLEDtorrent because it won't connect when there ARE peers. A torrent that is sitting there dead in qBittorrent will often start up in 2 seconds in uTorrent.
qBittorrent has something wrong with the way it connects. I can load the same single-peer torrent in qBittorrent and uTorrent 2.2.1 (with both clients showing connectable), start it in uTorrent and watch it happily download, then stop it and start it in qB and watch the peer's IP show up for several seconds before dropping with nothing transferred.
Stable peer to peer shouldn't be rocket science, but it seems to be above the heads of the qB developers.

qBittorrent seems to be on the level of uTorrent 1.4's connectability, IIRC. uTorrent finally got it nailed down with 1.6, which was a dream after all the instabilities prior.

For qB to be in development 10 years and still not have the basics down is pretty sorry.

>>58056338
Can you prove that any exploits were actually fixed? That's right, you can't, because it's proprietary. Enjoy mining bitcoins for free and who knows what else.

>>58065182
Meant for:
>>58056128

>>58065182
You don't seem to know how the burden of proof works.

>>58056338
The fact that you are using program made by the same people that later decided to ship it with built-in bitcoin botnet is enough for me not to ever touch it again.

>>58055020
STALLED

>>58065210
You don't torrent anyway, so why are you here?

>>58060409
>Everyone knows that 2.2.1 is the preferred version
Bloat-wise, sure… It was "the last good version" so to say.
But 2.2.1 has known performance issues with some newer SSDs and can have I/O errors on some modern setups.

It's also not the best idea to use a software with KNOWN security holes to connect to thousands of thousands of random machines on the Internet.

File: Untitled.png (24KB, 578x868px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 578x868px

>>58065235
>implying

>>58065246
speedtest?

File: 1418935760591.jpg (99KB, 494x500px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 494x500px

>>58065246

>>58065263
http://beta.speedtest.net/result/5891471525

Yea I know, non existent upload speed. It can't be helped where I live.

File: 4ktorrentsbabby.jpg (44KB, 600x124px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 600x124px

>>58055020
Cool, but is it capable of doing pic related?

>>58065205
https://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-quietly-installs-riskware-bitcoin-miner-users-report-150306/
https://torrentfreak.com/new-utorrent-release-breaks-ties-with-bitcoin-miner-150413/
http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5474

>>58058301
>Numerous times
>no source
Okay champ.

>>58065305
Now post something related to 2.2.1.
I'll wait.

>>58065324
https://sites.google.com/site/tlmcfiles/Touhou%20lossless%20music%20collection%20v.18.torrent?attredirects=0

Try downloading this torrent with 2.2.1 client. Good luck

File: Capture.png (43KB, 1053x301px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 1053x301px

>>58065246
>>58065287

>>58065349
I recently upgraded my server from Win 8.1 to Server 2012 R2 so I lost like 60TB of stats, and I'm soon making a move to 2016 so I will start fresh again...

>>58065372
>actually using windows server
lmao

>>58056110
Is this a legit transmission GUI? Where to get this?

File: Capture.png (22KB, 826x294px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 826x294px

>>58065383
sue me

>>58065324
http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5474
>DescriptionBitTorrent and uTorrent allow remote attackers to inject command line parameters and execute arbitrary commands via a crafted URL using the (1) bittorrent or (2) magnet protocol.
Do you not realize that this hasn't been fixed?

File: Tommy-DarkColors-Tranfers.Peers.png (467KB, 1200x675px) Image search: [Google]

467KB, 1200x675px

Why aren't u faggots using Tixati?
>b-b-but I get banned
It can fake its user client.

>>58065324
And by the way, please keep using an outdated software that has a capability of listening to incoming connections. I'm sure nothing can go wrong.

>>58065418
I said post something related to 2.2.1.
I'll wait.

>>58065422
because it kept crashing that piece of shit with large torrents

>>58065137
THIS.

>Using 2.2.1 deprecated, outdated software.

lmfoa just use better torrent clients.

>>58065422
Holy eye sore, the fuck is wrong with you?

>>58065422
does anyone in a private tracker actually use this? isnt it possible to eventually figure out that your spoofing your client.

File: 1463395591889.png (285KB, 1486x959px) Image search: [Google]

285KB, 1486x959px

>>58055020
WHOA, qB now plays well with GNOME/Cinnamon and it picked up all the system preferences!

WTF happend???? I don't see anything in release notes.

i mean...64-bit is cool and all but what's the point? when would a torrent program ever use >4GB?

>>58065422
holy jesus that UI is terrible.

>>58065401
transmission remote gui, it's on github

>>58065454
Let me remind that this:
>BitTorrent and uTorrent allow remote attackers to inject command line parameters and execute arbitrary commands via a crafted URL using the (1) bittorrent or (2) magnet protocol.
Hasn't been fixed in any subsequent versions and that is present in your precious 2.2.1.

>>58065483
holy shit, it's made in freepascal and Lazarus
russian madmen

>>58065481
>Performing a 64-bit operation on a 64-bit operating system is faster than performing it on a 32-bit operating system - it would take at least 2 32-bit operations to perform the same thing.
sauce: http://superuser.com/questions/271173/how-important-is-having-64-bit-programs-on-64-bit-os

File: Best.png (194KB, 1000x600px) Image search: [Google]

194KB, 1000x600px

>>58055043

>>58065467
Tixati has better UI than any other client imho
>>58065470
I do but I'm only in KG

Has anyone got stalled torrents on the latest release? I've been using it for the past year and havent had any

>>58065507
alright yeah that makes sense

anyone know how deluge stacks up at this point, if at all?

File: 3674449.png (48KB, 219x219px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 219x219px

>>58065507
wait... so it will benefit me even if I don't have a shitton of torrents up at one time?

>>58065604
probably not, but if you have a choice between 64bit and 32bit, always go 64.

>torrenting
>2016

holy shit
torrenting WHAT?

>>58065557
qstall stalls all the time for me, should have never listened to the meme.

>>58065674
Music, Movies, Pirated programs, Books...
I mean where else can I get raw blurays? Paywall warez?

>>58065464
Utorrent downloads your games faster than freetard trash.

>>58065676
yea? you're talking about the new release right? got screenshot?

>>58065674
Amateur videos of your mum in a BBC gangbang belive it or not.

File: give me those bitcoins goy.jpg (38KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 600x600px

>>58065695
who could be behind this post?

>>58065736
Probably some 14 - 16 yr old who downloaded uTorrent Pro CRACKED using uTorrent Free from public trackers from a non verified/trusted random uploader from some shady torrent site.

>>58065674
meme packs

>qbittorrent
>download speed decreases proportionally to your set upload speed

try it, download something and play around with your upload speed

File: 6a0120a85dcdae970b0128776ff992970c-pi.png (30KB, 200x193px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 200x193px

>>58065780
I often have my upload limit set to 50kb/s and I still get 25MB/s down with no issues.

>>58065780
WTF it deleted my oscars 200GB torrent. FUCK YOU

>>58065780
Yeah It does punish you for purposely limiting your upload speed.

"Dude wtf share all your upload bandwidth, SHARING IS CARING! You're not greedy scum are you, give but not take? OF COURSE NOT RIGHT!??"

Apparently they say all clients do this as it's got to do with uTP but nope it's just qBittorent that does it for me.

Devs ignored by questions about it so I stuck to uTorrent 2.2.1. Fuck freetard elitist retards.

>>58065492
I said post something related to 2.2.1.
I'll wait.

File: Capture.png (9KB, 330x241px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 330x241px

My icon now looks like shit, thanks

File: Capture.png (3KB, 55x95px)

3KB, 55x95px

>>58065862
It can be changed in settings

>>58056110
where can I get this for windows?

>>58065862
Change it in settings, Tom.

>>58065880
>>58065889
it still has jagged edges

>>58065900
Go see someone about your autism then. Literally no one else gives a fuck.

File: 1479362888960.png (364KB, 599x563px) Image search: [Google]

364KB, 599x563px

>>58065912
reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

>>58065557
>I've been using it for the past year
3.3.10 dropped yesterday, so pretty sure you haven't been using it for a year.
Poor connectivity was confirmed to still be present as of 3.3.7. I'm not going to check every release to see if they fixed it because qB has no killer feature that I'm waiting on. It's something I'll check maybe every six or eight months to make sure I'm not spouting an outdated meme. The release notes have been devoid of any mention of any connectivity fixes, so it's a good bet they're still present.

>>58065955
let me clarify, I've been using qbittorrent for a year. I just dont get how its affected only a small number of people compared to the entire userbase though.

>>58065955
i think it mite b sometin with yor pc cause i never had that problem

>>58066145
What makes you think I have one PC?
qB vs uT 2.2.1 on an X2 5200+ running XP? Winner: uT 2.2.1.
qB vs uT 2.2.1 on a Phenom II X4 945 running XP? Winner: uT 2.2.1
qB vs uT 2.2.1 on an X3450 running 8.1 N? Winner: uT 2.2.1.
qB vs uT 2.2.1 on an i5 4670k on 10? Winner: uT 2.2.1.
qB vs uT 2.2.1 on an i7 3770 on 10? Winner: uT 2.2.1.

>>58066325
I guess it's something wrong with your isp then. never had the problem myself. proud qbitorrent user

>>58066325
>windows
found your problem

>>58066339
If an ISP can drop qB traffic and not uT, that sounds like an issue with qB's management to me.

>>58066325
>we got a ut shill here kids, take a good luck because they are a dying breed. a year or two and they might be extinct completely. take all the pictures you want. look how desperate he is, just look! amazing! however, clinging to his old ways is what made his kind go extinct. it's kinda sad, really. okay kids, lets go, let him rest.

>>58055020
enjoy your stalled torrents freetard faggot

what is the prettiest torrent client on windows, because they all have similar feature sets and work fine.

pls post screenshot to go w/ it.

>>58065690

Tried not being a poor leech? Maybe you should try not being an entertainmentwhore too. I can't even think of 3 films right now I want to pirate.

tixati master race

>>58057311
>You are free to stick with any old version of qBittorrent and disable updates there too.

why bother when he's using a program that works fine already

why the arbitrary switch