NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO HOOOOOOOOOW COUULLD THIS HAPPEN????

>>58054444
Nice qUADS

i would agree that the 780ti didn't have good staying power,(still 60fps) BUT it is a SOLID GPU without issues from drivers.

I had a grand total of 1 driver issue for 2 days and that's it.
that's better than any AMD GPU i've owned

i sold mine for $260 a month ago, doesn't matter i guess.

>>58054444
>rx 480 getting beat by 970
trolololololol

>>58054444
the 1060 is really impressive here actually, pretty much on par with a Fury X

>>58055189
What's worse, that 970 is the standard OC edition. Most of the 970 out there can do 1500 on core easily. Thats 10% even more advantage.

But the 480 is more f-futureproof acording to AMDrones

>>58055271
human eyes cant see more than 3.5gb of vram

>>58055218
4.4TFLOPs vs 8.5TFLOPs

furyX still loses.

AMD really is shit

>>58055422
Nvidia reduces image quality to increase performance, they cheat.

>>58054444
Looking at this graph I think I'm gonna buy a used 970 as they are being sold for quite cheap and clearly offer the best price/performance.

>>58055422
clearly.

all this rage about AMD and dx12, when nothing runs dx12 well.

>>58055618
so why are you using windows 10 then

>>58054444
if this chart is even the tiniest bit legit, it makes me want to buy a 390X that I found for $280 kangaroo dollaridoos

>>58055926
twas free

>>58054444
>battlefield 1
>reliable benchmark

Also I love how a 970 is ahead of the 390x in this, and the 1060 is within spitting distance of the fury x.

>R9 290/390 STILL near top of the charts for 3 years running
Best GPU purchase I ever made

>>58056646
Considering a stock 970 is destroying a factory overclocked 290x(not the nonx option), you must be suffering a bad case of buyers remorse right now

>>58056646
LOL if only you weren't a millenial, the longevity and price:performance of the 5800 and 6800 line was so fucking good.
290/390 faggotry is just rebranded overpriced garbage.
meanwhile their refresh rx line can't even handle 1080p dx12 at playable framerates, at fermi levels of heat output while costing $100 more than the 6870 (which maxed dx11 at 1080p without deafening you)

>>58054444
What sort of benchmark doesn't include a 980 Ti