Virtualized gaming?

>>58049126
Nearly impossible i'm afraid those are direct x 10 ards and I doubt that you'd be able to just passthrough that Quadro Plex station without an issue to the VM.

>>58049126
Hyper-V on 2012 R2 or 2016 would be ideal. RemoteFX works alright now if you know what you're doing.

Virtualization overhead isn't really a big deal anymore on modernish hardware. Just don't use SR-IOV for the NIC and you will be fine for most games that aren't cutting edge.

>>58049126
>which is much cheaper than any comparable pc build i've been able to come up with.
Lol, no. Westmere (if you are smart enough to buy a 710 with Westmere processors) processors that you can't even overclock will not be good for playing games, never mind the ancient FX5800s. Using a rackmount machine for a desktop is also the height of stupidity.

>>58051827
>Using a rackmount machine for a desktop is also the height of stupidity
Sounds like you've never worked in environments where you have to installed security cabinets at every workstation to comply with physical security requirements.

>>58052352
Yes, because OP is obviously a business with security requirements.

Come on, stop trying to look smart and look at context.

File: MOOTSAD.jpg (7KB, 250x199px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 250x199px

710s are still 2/3 of my corporate server VM environment and /g/tards are salvaging them for cheap gaymen boxes.