Shitty App Design

Because that's part of material design, keeping things minimalistic. Why would you want a shit ton of stuff right when you open the app. I'd rather have the two options when I jump in the car to start playing something right away and drive off if I'm in a hurry. If I have more time it doesn't burn that much more calories sliding the bar out for some additional info.

I welcome minimalistic apps like this. Where if I need more functionality and tweaks, I have them. If I don't, then they're out of sight. I don't know why so many people hate it.

>>58039943

>I'd rather have the two options when I jump in the car to start playing something right away and drive off if I'm in a hurry

There are fucking 9 options, all of which are huge album art or icons. So instead of being able to go to the last album I listened to instantly I have to click another option, go to another option, and then finally I'm there.

I dont think most people have 1080p on their phones

>>58039851
Spotify doesn't have this problem.

>>58042322

I'd switch but GPM is a better value when you consider Youtube Red, either way it's a trend.

Spotify will show 2 options in a few months while Google Play Music is 6 months ahead 1 option.

File: vaguely useful.png (991KB, 607x1050px) Image search: [Google]

991KB, 607x1050px

Here is the app in 2012 - Galaxy S3 era.

Notice how much information is displayed - you can easily get to albums, artist, recents, etc right from the front page without having to go to a retarded swipe menu because it's trying to take advantage of the massive 4.8 display.

>>58040148
Is that a big problem?
Those are still 5 to 6 inch displays.