Request for PDF viewer identification

Do not mind the menu with "Add/Edit a note" options. It is of the Denemo music notation editor. http://www.denemo.org/

If somebody wants to know it, the latest available version of Denemo is 2.0.14.

Anyone?

Isn't it an easy question?

Looks like epdfview without a menubar.

File: bcfbf9ec1c2f1befb1b6ddea7a9385cb_medium.png (158KB, 550x480px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 550x480px

>>58035648
Yeah, epdfview has "File Edit View Go Help" menu.

>>58035648
Have you any clue, whether epdfview is usable or not? What does it depend on besides Gtk+?
Or does it have WxWidgets GUI?

Found here: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/7.9/pst/epdfview.html

> ePDFView Dependencies
>Required
>
>GTK+-2.24.29 and Poppler-0.41.0
>Recommended (mainly for Desktop Environments)
>
>desktop-file-utils-0.22 and hicolor-icon-theme-0.15
>Optional
>
>Cups-2.1.3
>
>User Notes: http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/wiki/epdfview

>>58035707
It was a GTk2 + poppler project for people that didn't want a full DE, so it was pretty lean.
I used it with LXDE some years ago.

I think it was discontinued, though. There's a Qt inspired alternative.

If you want a lean PDF viewer you might prefer Zathura or xPDF.

Dependencies are OK, but is this viewer reliable? Won't it crash in the worst possible moment? It is so minimalistic and neet, somebody on 4chan must have experience with it.

>>58035770
OK, thanks. Ignore the post above.

Honestly, now I'm using Firefox for PDF viewing, and it suites quite well for the job.
Deleted evince, because it became a dependency pig (it depends on gvfs, and tries to pull in lots of low level filesystem-related stuff).