I really dislike no-sql

It has its uses, put RDBMSes put it to shame 99% of the time.

I dislike MongolDB but I love redis

>>58007699
I love memegodDB and dislike everything else.

File: lauging_chinks.jpg (214KB, 936x434px) Image search: [Google]

214KB, 936x434px

>>58009465
> i love mongoloid db

>>58007699
It's definitely not "Mongol" because nobody calls Mongols for Mongo.

>>58009753
Is it mongo for mongoloid? I have heard "Mongo" being used to refer to those with downs syndrome. Literally downs syndrome db. Why would they call it that?

>>58010049
because it accurately describes people who decide to use it in production

>>58010180
I know a popular news site that use it without any issue.

>>58006623
MongoDB is a web scale database, and doesn't use SQL or JOINs, so it's high-performance.

>>58006623
same

>>58010180

Holy shit. I need to create a fork named MongolDB and actually do something to make people use it.

>>58007682
Relational databases weren't built for web scale. MongoDB handles web scale. You turn it on and it scales right up.

>>58010406
>what is postgreSQL

There are relational databases that handles scale fine.

>>58010352
>High Performance
>Database

[laughing_girls.png]

>>58010049
>>58010180
>>58010392
Why not go the full way and call it SpasticStorage or CrippleCenterDB.