AMD Ryzen = Ringu Rasen

>>57994123
>tfw you upgrade from a Celery to a Raisin

>>57994123
new Zen cpu + 490 in 4k was stuttering in battlefront...

File: 1468865646541.jpg (98KB, 781x1177px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 781x1177px

>>57994413
>Its almost lie....
>wait for it...
>"They're unfinished products..."

Imagine fucking that. Unfinished products being shown off before they're released

Enjoy your 1% performance increase on Kaby Lake you pissdrinking jewtel cuckshill.

>>57994729
Amdrones, everyone

File: 1469909971934.gif (3MB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 500x500px

GO AMD GO

>>57994729
i WANT amd to perform good, i really fucking do.

But, poor performance is inexcusable for them now.

>>57994174
why did i laugh at this

>>57994729
dude im not on any colors teams, bt AMD is catching up to where intel was 6 years ago. they havent released anything worth while in 4 years. they honestly should finish a product before showing it, its not like people arent willing to wait.

>>57994780
>AMD is catching up to where intel was 6 years ago
Did you not see the demonstrations?

>>57994795
different guy here. they might be same speed now, but the AMD CPUs are terribly inefficient (high tdp) and hot. they are also larger chips. intel could do the same, but they value efficiency more atm. those benchmarks you saw there do not represent actual performance in real life scenarios either btw.
also, skylake is not the newest either.

>>57994823
See this is where the I didn't watch but want to talk anyway comes out.

>>57994823
A TDP is not something you can just get wrong and shrug off like "oh well it varies". Or "Oh well, its almost as good as 4GB anyway".

95W TDP, beating an Intel 6900K.

And Kaby lake is already to be proven barely better than Skylake.

>but the AMD CPUs are terribly inefficient (high tdp) and hot. they are also larger chips.

Do you know that for sure? Probably not. The Ryzen series probably isnt burdened by shitty iGPU's. You say that its hotter and 'terribly inefficient'. But this new processor would prove the opposite finally. AMD isn't the palate for the 'inefficient and hot'. Its the processor. It doesn't come from the brand name. They're not using 32nm GloFo. New lithography. New design. Almost nothing in common with Piledriver

Its like everyone in this fucking thread thinks that AMD is re-releasing the FX 8350.

>those benchmarks you saw there do not represent actual performance in real life scenarios either btw.
And neither do the benchmarks for the Intel processor.

>>57994780
>>57994823
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNQjh47PPXQ

Here, watch this you normie faggot.

>>57994729
Woo the "its going to be the best thing ever" is beginning, Over trumped stats and how itll kill all others in its way.

Its going to be a bag of shyte

>>57995013
>calls someone a normie
>he links some paid faggot marketing

File: c4jt321.png (310KB, 580x282px) Image search: [Google]

310KB, 580x282px

>>57996022
>Amd is shit
>Intel does literally nothing
>Tfw still using i5 2500k

File: Screenshot from 2016-12-14 17-22-52.png (52KB, 704x299px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 704x299px

>>57994123
wew

>>57998471
don't you have some sisters/daughters to lend out to some arab refugees, franz?

>>57998677
I'm a Virgin

>>57994123
no it's actually
>AMD has finally Ryzen

>>57998832
It's pronounced rye-zen

>>57998862
metal gear ryezen