>Starting in January users will be prompted to run Flash on a site-by-site basis for sites that they have never visited before. We want to avoid over-prompting users, so over time we’ll tighten this restriction using Site Engagement Index, a heuristic for how much a user interacts with a site based on their browsing activity. In October all sites will require user permission to run Flash.
https://blog.chromium.org/2016/12/roll-out-plan-for-html5-by-default.html
What's holding back the great push for flash? Games? Streaming services? >>>/f/?
Sorry, the great push OUT of flash*
It's /f/, they're behind it all.
>>57971485
Adobe will one of these days release the source code to the adobe flash player.
>>57971632
I don't think even that will save it.
I'm guessing Flash games since there's literally no other use for Flash Player.
Flash is shit and deserves no sympathy, I wish they'd phase it out faster.
How will 20 years of flash games be saved if flash dies?
There just needs to be an free alternative to flash, or everyone just starts using HTML5 for games
>>57971762
is software able to die?
The reason Flash is taking so long to phase out is that there is no "HTML5"
It's simply a series of APIs from Microsoft, Google and Adobe that are changed whenever they feel like it.
normies don't know how to do anything without flash