>>57904885
TypeScript
Spring
>>57905083
> TypeScript
> Framework
Even if you're meme-ing, you did a bad job.
Also:
DAILY REMINDER THAT ALL JS FRAMEWORKS ARE CANCER.
>>57905731
> DAILY REMINDER THAT ALL JS FRAMEWORKS ARE CANCER.
Explain.
So i must go full vanilla JS? Or use another?
>>57905731
I recommended a different language, because JavaScript is shit, so why not use another one (even if it is just a transpiler)
>>57905789
>because JavaScript is shit
y
jQuery. Its time tested and never breaks like all this other new shit
why not just use vanilla so shit keeps working instead of breaking whenever some hipster dev sneezes?
http://vanilla-js.com/
>>57905759
- Bloated
- Unstable
- Too new/unproven
- Cancerous to work with (as a dev)
- Not supported anymore
Pretty much every JS Framework falls into at least one of those categories.
Just create-react-app.
npm i -g create-react-app.
>>57905935
Lmao
>>57906034
Lmao
>>57906152
What is Netflix/Facebook/Linkedin.
vue.js
>>57906214
can't make websites with react because other websites compete with facebook which is against the licence. enjoy your lawsuit
>>57906214
This is me
>>57906152
My last project was sub 100kb gzipped. React. Your points suck.
>>57906231
It's too easy to write non-performant code with it. Built in observables are bad. I couldn't imagine through this at a couple junior devs and expecting them to write good code.
Lifecycle methods are severely underdeveloped.
No `componentWillReceiveProps` equivalent is terrible for large-scale app performance.
>>57906214
This is me
>>57906255
Totally false. Go read the license again.
From a core contributor of React
> only the patent grant might terminate if you were to sue Facebook; the BSD license that the code is provided under remains valid regardless.
React and React Native is used at both Google and Microsoft. Do you think they would be using it if lawsuits were a worry?
>>57906152
You sound so bitter. jQuery, for all the shit people say about it, makes scripting the dom FAST.
Also if you need animations, Greensock is a nice framework that has been around since the flash days.
>>57904885
Angular is pretty great
>>57906152
There's thousands of JS frameworks.
It's a bit difficult to a beginner like me to select the "right ones" to study.
>>57907977
>There's thousands of JS frameworks.
There's like 5 prevalent, widely used ones that basically do the same thing. No one takes the micro, mini "frameworks" seriously except for JS enthusiasts.
>>57904885
Angular 1.X is unironically bretty gud once you grok the best patterns
>>57910586
I currently work on 3 projects that use angular and every single one of them is dog slow. Sure it's probably because some of the devs fucked up, but it seems to be quite easy to do so. If I made these apps in pure js, it would be about a million times faster (not even joking)
>>57904885
Leftpad is the must-have framework.