speccy thread

File: specs 4.0GHz.png (366KB, 1666x631px) Image search: [Google]

366KB, 1666x631px

FPBP

File: Dell Optiplex Speccy.png (60KB, 1280x768px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 1280x768px

What would you do with this pc?

>>57897035
shove it up my rectum

File: Capture.jpg (37KB, 495x392px)

37KB, 495x392px

8350 clocked @ 4.6ghz

File: Old Desktop Speccy.png (39KB, 776x478px)

39KB, 776x478px

>>57897035
Also have this one and one more laying around.

File: laptop specs.png (24KB, 669x471px)

24KB, 669x471px

>>57897048
And this one.

>>57896802
>6800k
>gtx 660
what
>>57897035
pull some parts from it that might be useful, reuse the case
>>57897048
you might be able to upgrade a few things in this to make it a decent work pc

>>57897064
>reuse the case
It's one of the weird clam shell cases i don't think i can re-use it easily.
>>57897064
>upgrade a few things in this to make it a decent work pc
Ram and what else? I added the graphics card recently lol.

>>57897090
cpu if you can, might have to replace the mobo
storage
the gpu is fine

>>57897095
why do you have a 4k tv connected to your setup?
why is it 30hz?
why is one of your monitors 59hz?
why are you using a gtx 1060 3gb?
how the fuck do you have a 3tb ssd?

>>57897103
Ya the mobo will need replacement if I want a new cpu and ya it could use more storage.

>>57897118
>>57897118
>why do you have a 4k tv connected to your setup?
Why Not?
>>57897118
>why is it 30hz?
That's the refresh rate my motherboard supports.
>>57897118
>why is one of your monitors 59hz?
Not sure why speccy says that should be 60hz.
>>57897118
>why are you using a gtx 1060 3gb?
Because I got it for cheap.
>>57897118
>how the fuck do you have a 3tb ssd?
I don't, it's a 3tb WD passport and speccy thinks its a ssd.

File: specco.jpg (92KB, 786x442px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 786x442px

maxes out most games at 1080p 60-100fps+

thinking about dropping a 490 into it next year

>>57897047
>SeaGrenade
Hope those are non-essential files on that disk.

>>57897164
What monitors? Also lol at speccy for just stating that it's a monitor.

>>57897164
at 1920x1200?
your 390 is fine

>>57897064
>top tier CPU and shit tier GPU
it's because I don't play games but I do numerical simulations

File: speccy.png (35KB, 770x407px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 770x407px

>>57897164
>maxes out most games at 1080p 60-100fps

I think you meant to say maxes out most ps3 ports. Also speccy won't detect oced non-k 3570 @4k for some reason.

File: speccy 4930K.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>57896758

File: ss (2016-12-08 at 07.05.57).png (19KB, 487x396px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 487x396px

>tfw got impatient and ordered a 960 when I could have waited an extra pay period last summer and bought a 980

File: 1.png (55KB, 928x651px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 928x651px

:^)

File: speccy.jpg (61KB, 518x401px)

61KB, 518x401px

Everyone is a /g/amer, right?

File: speccy.png (50KB, 1192x696px)

50KB, 1192x696px

Traveling in London is a pain

>>57897047
Ayyy you had the exact same base specs as me except that I had a 960 and a cheapo 1080p 16:9 aoc display. Now I'm running 6600k / Rx 480 tho.

>>57897065
>3570k
INTO THE TRASH

File: pcpcp.png (37KB, 731x566px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 731x566px

Budget as fuck

File: speccy3.png (24KB, 495x427px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 495x427px

>>57897306
i like your style

File: specsdec16.png (41KB, 709x563px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 709x563px

>>57899613
ECKS 99

Need to fix XMP. Lazy.

File: demtempstho.png (38KB, 772x447px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 772x447px

Ignore temps, I have my fans on a very slow rotation to generate less noise since I'm only browsing right now.

File: Speccy 9-26-16.jpg (260KB, 808x861px) Image search: [Google]

260KB, 808x861px

>>57902764
XMP is a right bitch on X99 from my experience, never sets the correct S/A voltage so I have to manually set it.

>>57902764
>>57903543
XMP is a meme so vendors can try to sell garbage to gamer faggots.

>>57903754
...well without XMP my RAM runs at 2133MHz, with the XMP enabled I can hit 3200MHz.

It's not a meme, it's just a pain in the ass to make sure it's been enabled properly on X99.

I never had any issues with XMP on Z97.

>>57903809
It is a meme because all it does is let vendors sell poorly overclocked RAM to gamers. If you want overclocked RAM, buy the fastest JEDEC standard module and overclock that.

File: Speccy.png (38KB, 684x553px)

38KB, 684x553px

>>57899613

Mirrin hardware breh.

>>57903842
>buy the fastest JEDEC standard module
lol?

The fastest JEDEC standard DDR4 module is 2400MHz CL-15.

The fastest XMP kits are 4133MHz CL-19

Good luck overclocking and let me know how it turns out.

File: Capture.png (36KB, 659x474px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 659x474px

I'm a little late to this one

>>57903958
>The fastest XMP kits are 4133MHz CL-19
I bet they work less than half the time at that effective rate. You know Corsair or whoever the fuck doesn't get special chips, right? The chips are only built to the JEDEC specifications.

>>57903984
>76C
Sir

>>57904022
>The chips are only built to the JEDEC specifications
That's simply not true, they are fabbed to meet the JEDEC specification at minimum (for JEDEC certification which is basically required to sell RAM).

The reason they aren't clocked higher by default is they would no longer meet the JEDEC spec, so they use XMP to get around it.


If you honestly think they're all the same I fucking dare you to go out and find some run of the mill DDR4 and try to clock it ANYWHERE near 4000mhz with CL under 22.

>>57897166
>SeaGrenade
I zozzled more than I wanted.

>>57904096
You're saying this like you can reliable expect that effective rate and CAS latency from your XMP DIMMs, when you can't. XMP works way less often than it doesn't.
>The reason they aren't clocked higher by default is they would no longer meet the JEDEC spec, so they use XMP to get around it.
You are such a moron. They're not designed to go higher, because they're designed to meet the specification.

File: Speccy - 08DEC2016.png (100KB, 880x638px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 880x638px

Any idea why my RAM isn't performing as should be?

>>57904156
>XMP works way less often than it doesn't.
Anyone can make shit up if they feel like it, why not post literally any sort of proof?

Oh wait, you don't have any.

>They're not designed to go higher, because they're designed to meet the specification

And yet the kits that can hit 4000+ MHz are always running low on stock because they dont produce many of them and they cost $200+ for 8GB just for shit's and giggles.


If they could just throw any chips in there and slap an XMP sticker on it and sell it as 4000MHz+ they fucking would.

If you buy XMP RAM and it doesn't work at it's advertised XMP speeds, you can get a refund you faggot moron.

>bought a Liquid CPU Cooler
>install it and turn it on PC
>idle temp is 37C
>think nothing at first
>feel like something isn't right
>remove Liquid CPU Cooler
>see that I forgot to remove the plastic cover on the copper plate
>remove plastic and reinstall
>idle temps is now 30C

>>57904163
What's wrong with it? That's 3200MHz CL16

>>57904189
Morons separated from the money so easily.

>>57904223
Good explanation.

You're literally retarded, if they could get away with slapping whatever XMP they wanted on a stick of RAM why do you think there are SOOOO many kits available in the 2133-3000MHz range, but once you get over 3600MHz stock goes way down, half the kits are out of stock, and the other half are $200+


If you actually think they're the same, why wouldnt the manufacturers just pull some of the "cheaper" stick out, slap a more expensive XMP stick on it, and then put it back up as the more expensive units that are out of stock?

File: spec.jpg (92KB, 660x522px)

92KB, 660x522px

Just need to purchase a better GPU soon and maybe try some CPU overclocking at some point.

File: Speccy.png (49KB, 718x449px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 718x449px

Hello you fat cunts

File: Screenshot (35).png (17KB, 433x444px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 433x444px

>>57904163
It throttles

Is your CPU always running at 3.6 Ghz?

pic related

File: speccy.png (58KB, 879x662px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 879x662px

>>57899613
I play indie pixel shit

>>57904540
Retard

>>57904540
it's a 6850k you dumbass, it can clock up to 4.2GHz with relative ease on all 6cores.

Not to mention "it throttles" isn't an answer when he was talking about RAM.

>>57904194
>he fell for the liquid cooling meme
>his idle temp is higher than ambient+2

File: speccy2.png (40KB, 788x578px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 788x578px

young whippersnappers these days...

>>57904825
idle temp means dicks and has mostly to do with your ambient air temp and your fan curve.

Some people like their computers to be quiet, even under moderate load, so the fan curve will let the CPU hit 50C before the fans spin up past 400rpm.

File: hdd.png (68KB, 1152x663px)

68KB, 1152x663px

What do i do with this? Does it mean its completely down the shitter?

>>57904880
Change the power and SATA cables (as well as the SATA port on the motherboard to rule that out)

if you still get similar errors, yeah it's dead/dying.

Backup and replace.

File: image.jpg (67KB, 670x635px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 670x635px

do I buy something or no?

File: image.jpg (2MB, 2338x1946px)

2MB, 2338x1946px

>>57904926
Temps are taken after an hour of gay men
And here's one hard drive

>>57904995
>screenshots

what are they ?

>>57904995
>>57904926

Buy a gun and use it to kill yourself.

>>57905072
Can't, I don't live in burgerland

File: 2016-12-08 17_25_18-CrystalDiskMark 5.2.0 Shizuku Edition x64 (UWP).png (846KB, 790x645px) Image search: [Google]

846KB, 790x645px

>>57904995
why is intel performance always behind samsung


really makes you think

File: ayylmao.png (47KB, 791x538px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 791x538px

Got a dead RAM channel which sucks. Need a replacement board. Also 4.0 GHz.

File: Untitled.png (142KB, 1075x661px)

142KB, 1075x661px

>>57903729
mein bratja

>>57905132
Intel makes trash SSDs.

>>57905132
950/960 pros are just nuts, but i thought their SATA drives were nearly equal like most SSDs

>>57904825
low idle temps are a meme.

File: image.jpg (94KB, 535x393px)

94KB, 535x393px

>>57905176
Maybe their normie SSDs but not their enterprise SSDs

>>57905212
are you an enterprise or a normie

File: Untitled.png (127KB, 1008x642px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 1008x642px

>>57905164
Wait I forgot I bought an SSD last week.

>>57904880
A couple years and it's almost dead? Doesn't sound right.

>>57905235
How could you forget? Just using a computer with an HDD boot drive feels like AIDS to me these days.

SSD is a requirement in 2016.

>>57905107
Poor Euro.

>>57905245
Mostly because the whole computer is new and the SSD is just the newest addition.

Plan to get a better storage drive this week, not sure what to get next.
Liquid cooler? Power supply?

>>57905298
>Power supply?
well that's something you should never cheap out on, but if you have a good quality 3-4 year old unit, no reason to replace it.

If you're running a garbage unit, replace that next with something good. Your computer would struggle to use 350w, but a quality Silver/gold rated 500-600w PSU would be more than enough.

>>57905212
Enterprise SSDs are out of the price range of most people.

>>57905243
Yeah i thought the same. Im doing a surface test and if it reports no bad sectors i guess il still use it.

File: image.jpg (60KB, 645x493px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 645x493px

>>57905355
Not for xXgamersXx

>>57905335
I'm two years into a shitty 500w Thermaltake

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817153165

I want something that's less nailbiting and possibly modular so I don't have to stuff cabled in my case.

File: Speccy64_2016-12-08_23-45-01.png (16KB, 496x286px)

16KB, 496x286px

>>57904856
>implying cool = loud

>>57905235
>1804x1026

File: 1459971370694.jpg (45KB, 728x728px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 728x728px

>>57905523

File: Capture.png (50KB, 692x553px)

50KB, 692x553px

Brazil is so hot

>>57905505
>implying I implied that
Fuck off, I specifically said ambient air temp is the biggest fucking factor to begin with.

>>57905575
look at the thighs on her

File: Speccy.png (44KB, 717x550px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 717x550px

Put this build together yesterday.
Still going to throw in one of those insanely fast Samsung 960 drives once they start appearing in stores around here.

File: ss (2016-10-05 at 09.18.14).png (85KB, 994x782px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 994x782px

Want to get a 34" display like the Acer X34 to replace my U2711s, convince me not to /g/

File: dubs get.png (37KB, 883x535px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 883x535px

J/U/S/T

>>57907266
Reported to FBI for C.P.

>>57907266
>dual channel

File: Untitled.png (35KB, 660x525px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 660x525px

The laptop I'm currently using until my PC is running again.

File: Sperks.png (53KB, 707x523px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 707x523px

mhm

File: 2016-11-21 (2).png (45KB, 690x540px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 690x540px

E5-2683v3, retail, not ES.

>>57910161
>retail, not ES.
just means you spent more than you needed to.
Especially if you're just a home user.

>>57910330
It was $350 off eBay. I think that's an acceptable price.

>>57910423
Half the time those are just ES's anyway

>>57910461
Intel's CPU identification tool doesn't lie. I also have an ES 12 core so I know how it works.

>>57910477
What's the sspec on it?

>>57910679
Sr1xh according to hwinfo64

>>57910679
And my 12 core ES is QEYU, as far as I know all engineering samples ha a qspec number. Sspec only for production units.

>>57910848
Yea it's a production unit, but the price is unusual. I know that chinks write fake sspecs on heatspreader, but I don't know them to ever change it on the actual processor. Don't know if that is even possible.
They also sometimes sell oem rejects. Those have production sspecs.

Could be just some decommissioned server being sold to parts, but it seems awfully early for haswell-E servers to get replaced.

>>57899613
You're just an idiot who should have gotten a xeon

>>57905157
Why would you ever buy that cpu

>>57910908
I know, my ES has fake sspec on the heat spreader. But this 2683 seems to be a legit unit, everything identifies it as production model, and the actual clock speeds match that. I don't think it's possible to change the CPU name inside the CPU. It came from Japan, not from China. Anyways it was a good purchase.

>>57911159
The guy you got it from also sells Es chips? I think I know him.

>>57911179
Nah, he only sold this type and E5-2695v2 chips. Nothing else.

>>57911199
I guess they are starting to clear haswell-E server farms.

>>57911282
Well I'm quite happy they do :D will last me for 2 years or so. Then I'll upgrade to kaby lake x or something.

>>57910971
I have a 6900K and wish I'd bought the 6950X. It's starting to bottleneck me a little

File: gspecs.png (26KB, 473x400px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 473x400px

>>57896758

>>57911376
why is my motherboard so hot?

>>57911698
>fire hazard

File: a;lsdkfj.png (41KB, 663x474px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 663x474px

How bad am I bottlenecking myself? Also, should I just get a good 1156 cpu, or should I just spring for a new motherboard, and get a good 1155 cpu?

File: speccy.png (76KB, 665x528px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 665x528px

r8 me

File: untitled.png (40KB, 680x539px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 680x539px

am i doing it right?

>>57896758
>gtx 1060 6gb
>2gb

Why don't any of these system info programs report the vram amount correctly? dxdiag thinks my gtx 1070 has 4gb of ram.

>>57902582
but why

File: Speccy.png (37KB, 693x543px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 693x543px

Just bought this rig today. Still need to migrate over a Samsung 840 EVO 500GB and some extra case fans. Listened to /g/ and bought the the Fractal Define S, glad I did. Pimp case. Cooling it with a Noctua NH-D15. Deadly silent and quiet. Have yet to overclock her yet, still installing applications. What's everyone else been able to achieve for an overclock with their 6800k's?

>>57907216
How do you like the Samsung 950 NVMe? Notice the speed difference compared to other SSD's in the real world?

>>57911597
well it would depend what you're doing. For gaming the real bottleneck would be the low single core performance.

>>57911904
>What's everyone else been able to achieve for an overclock with their 6800k's?
~4.2GHz

File: pyGbncG.png (44KB, 742x595px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 742x595px

>>57896758

>>57910330
>just means you spent more than you needed to.
No, it means he isn't retarded. He has a processor with known errata and he actually owns what he paid for.

>>57911199
Is he still selling Ivy Bridge-E parts? I could use some.

>>57916080
>actually owns what he paid for.
unless you're a business or large corporation, intel simply wont care.

Say what you will, but people have been using ES's at home for personal use for literally a decade+ without issue.

You're technically right, but when there are literally no examples of Intel asking for an ES back from a home consumer, I think you're fairly safe.

>>57916137
It doesn't matter if Intel cares, you still can't buy stolen property and it still doesn't belong to you. I understand the dirt cheap ES models but people actually spend thousands on them which is ridiculous and I know that's not throwaway money for them or they'd just by real ones.

And that's not even getting into them being broken, sometimes in ways undetectable until you try to use a feature.

>>57916300
>you still can't buy stolen property
You very easily can, you know how I know this?

I bought an ES 5 years ago, used it daily. Only recently upgraded and since i have microcenter nearby now, I went with their in-store sale pricing on Haswell-E instead of a Xeon.


It was stolen, I bought it, I ran it as my daily CPU for years, and I sold it along with the rest of my build to an older gentlemen who needed a cheap desktop. And guess what?

It's still working for him too.


Who cares if it's stolen? Who cares if you don't TECHNICALLY according to the letter of the law own the CPU?

You have it in your phyiscal possession, it works in your motherboard, it runs your programs and performs at it's specified speeds, etc. For all intents and purposes, it's your CPU in every way but the legal sense of the word.

>>57916379
Holy shit this guy is retarded.

>>57916432
he's a retard that saved a few hundred bucks and used the CPU for years without issue.


I'm really not seeing a downside actually. I mean, sure there is no warranty and it's technically not his. But if it works, who gives a flying fuck?

>>57916573
His argument is 'you can break the law if you don't get caught!' How is that not retarded?

>>57916669
Because it's like smoking weed, unless you're a big time dealer moving $1000's per week, no one gives a fuck about the couple of grams you're smoking on your own.

Just how if intel found out Amazon was buying 200+ ES's off ebay for 1/5th of their retail price, you bet your ass there would be a court case.

But in the same vein, Intel couldnt give two shits about you in your basement encoding your DVD collection.

>>57916669
He is not breaking a law. The person selling it is. If he sold it, at that point he is breaking a law but I find a hard time caring.

>>57916783
Yeah I sold it to a neighbor for like $100.

>>57904880
Seagate is shit, i had one ST2000 (2TB) which failed after 2 years. Now i got an "new" (500h of use) and it has calibration problems according to HD Tune.
Dont ever buy seagate.

>>57916783
>He is not breaking a law.
Why are people on this website so ignorant of the law?

>>57917559
Yeah like smoking weed outside in Sanfransico or jay walking in NYC.

A cop could watch you do it and nothing would happen.

>>57917618
Cops are not the law. Stop trying to make analogies, you aren't good at them. Receiving stolen property is against the law, period.

>>57917559
The law you're violating is contract law you stupid hack. The contract is that Intel gives you these chips for use but retains ownership and you are not allowed to sell them. If someone sells them and you are the new holder of the device, you technically don't have a contract with Intel - but if you try to sell the device, they can take you to court for it. Civil court mind you, not a criminal court.

The device is not even "stolen".

>>57917696
>The device is not even "stolen"
How is a device that owned by someone else that's sold to you by a third party not stolen?

>>57917662
kek, no it isn't

Go steal an iphone and give it to a random stranger, is it THEIR responsibility to know that it was stolen?

Nope.


You go after the seller because KNOWINGLY selling something that is not yours is illegal.

If no one involved knows better, or in the case of ebay, you looked up a CPU number, bought the cheapest one and you don't know about CPUs enough to know it's an ES. Good fucking luck ever getting ANY legal action against that individual, and even IF you could get it into a court room, you'd 9 times out of 10 be laughed out because it's fucking retarded to put blame on the consumer and pretty much any judge would say so.

>>57917757
"receiving stolen property is not illegal"
Wow.

>>57917743
Because the ownership is not transferred in the sale. The seller violates his contract and legal action can be taken against him by Intel. Intel can also ask for their processor back from you and take you to court over that, obviously - but they don't give a shit either way.

These processors are literal trash as far as Intel is concerned, and unless you're a corporate user they have no financial incentive to deal with the situation. They can't do anything with these processors other than destroy them or store them in a bin somewhere.

File: Capture.png (338KB, 930x716px) Image search: [Google]

338KB, 930x716px

Got the i7 and Mobo from an asus prebuilt

File: Blury_Colors-wallpaper-11120016_20161209141710109.jpg (2MB, 1920x2160px)

2MB, 1920x2160px

I know, it's bad.. It's a temporary thing, I promise

>>57918532
Honestly, that's fine for literally anything besides ultra quality in AAA games.

A GTX 950 should be fine getting playable FPS in literally every game at 1080p if you're willing to lower the details down to ~medium settings.

File: 2016-12-09_14-21-38.jpg (390KB, 2560x1080px) Image search: [Google]

390KB, 2560x1080px

>>57896758
Fell for the ultra wide meme. Honestly, none of the games I play support the resolution but all this extra space has been great for having two programs side by side when I'm doing work for college, and watching movies on it has been pretty fucking cool.

>>57918559
Right you are. It pulls its weight just fine to be honest :) Perfectly acceptable until Vega

I'd received a lot a flak for it before on this board so I figured I'd go in with caution

Also white supremacy

File: gits.jpg (3MB, 3719x2092px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3719x2092px

>>57918608
5820k and GTX 960 here, so you'll get no hate from me.

Only games I play really is CSGO and skyrim though.

>>57905157
You should be doing 4k @ 60hz or 1440 @ 144hz.

>>57911953
Not really. It is undeniably faster, but the other SSD is fast enough anyway. I guess I would notice it if I copied files from another 950 to this one, but I don't so I can't reach the maximum speeds.

File: msi.png (58KB, 880x775px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 880x775px

Would this run Crysis?

>>57896758
Why use speccy over CPU-Z? What extra features does it provide?

>>57922255
it provides a total system snapshot in a single image.

CPU-z provides a snapshot of just your CPU.

Even if you were to go through the other tabs and take more screenshots, speccy still has more depth to it's tools, S.M.A.R.T readings, etc.

>>57923150
You guys should try hwinfo64 for a change, it's much better than speccy.

>>57923756
I have used it, but while it has all of the same information, it's not presented in a single sheet you can easily take a single screen shot of.

It has a lot of superfluous information most people either dont care about or dont even know what it is in the first place.

Speccy is the right mix of detail, and simplicity.


Would be nice if it were kept more up to date however and bugs fixed.

File: hwinfo.png (72KB, 640x577px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 640x577px

>>57924517
It has a system summary page, what do you reckon is missing from it? Sound card and monitor I guess, but it has some other interesting things like actual RAM timings (speccy display em incorrectly a lot of the time.) and it can actually display your overclocks if you put a load on your system. Which I have not done.

>>57924648
>missing from it
Well no temps are shown
No monitors are shown
If you have mutliple CPUs or GPUs there are separate pages for each, etc.

That and all of that extra shit no one in here cares about, We don't need to see the CPU feature set, we don't need a list of all the XMP profiles your RAM has available, we don't need any of that lower level detail.


It's a speccy thread, all that is needed is full system specs, including monitors resolution and model number, GPUs, CPUs, and their temps, and all the drives, etc.


HWinfo64 has all of this, just not all in a well presented single page.

>>57924701
Oh. I didn't think about temperatures. I don't even know how hot or cold my CPU/GPU get.

File: Untitled.png (58KB, 790x607px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 790x607px

should i upgrade ?

File: Screenshot from 2016-12-09 22-11-25.png (108KB, 732x438px)

108KB, 732x438px

haha hey guys :)

>>57904150
Core Solo?

>>57925086
Like a single core Core Duo

>>57924746
>144hz monitor
>60hz

>>57925076
>installs neofetch just for this
well played anon, well played

>>57918686
Same kek

File: Speccy64_2016-12-10_00-41-50.png (40KB, 685x544px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 685x544px

Applied an OC.

>>57926546
>2133mhz RAM
is your XMP enabled?


Also, post a CPU-z, whats your clocks and voltage.

File: Speccy64_2016-12-10_00-58-43.png (48KB, 873x606px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 873x606px

This is basically a whole new PC from the last time I posted in one of these, only thing the same is the case and old drives

File: S.jpg (120KB, 827x553px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 827x553px

>>57896758

>>57925153
>144hz is a need, even when just browsing /g/

File: cpu temp.jpg (183KB, 1127x771px) Image search: [Google]

183KB, 1127x771px

>>57903984
Dude, your cpu's is kinda hot. Definitely gotta look into it.

Here, have some AMD coolness.

>>57897035
turn it off

File: 2016-10-15.png (44KB, 955x739px)

44KB, 955x739px

>>57896758

>>57897620
>windows fundamentals for legacy PCs
haven't seen that in a long time

File: speccy.png (37KB, 660x525px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 660x525px

>>57896758
Somehow my corsair ram isn't recognised by speccy. The gpu is a 8gb model btw

>>57907340
no need, windows 10 does that automatically

>this many Botnet 10 users
did /v/eddit take over /g/?

Guys

help

File: screenshot.png (37KB, 788x504px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 788x504px

Am I going to die?

>>57929526
only if you kill yourself, dont do it senpai

File: screenfetch.png (103KB, 709x289px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 709x289px

>>57925076
Hi there

>>57929526
Not you, just your laptop

File: IMG_20161203_080350_1280x720.jpg (946KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

946KB, 1280x960px

https://pcpartpicker.com/list/2HpcGf
Maybe I'll return the 1080 and wait for Vega or get a 480. I don't really play games although Witcher is nice. Don't think I can a Vega equivalent of the 1080 for < $400 though.

>>57929771
how 2 fix