>he's still using DDR3

>>57858074
DDR3 is in many situations faster than DDR4, including gaming. DDR4 was created mainly for lower power use and workstation tasks.

File: 1480975677870.jpg (156KB, 536x593px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 536x593px

>>57858074
no, I'm still using FB-DIMM

>>57858074
>he thinks the numbers matter

>>57858102
>including gaming
Nope.

>mfw still using ddr2-800 with C2Q
>noface.png

>>57858074
>hahahaha look at him! fucking peasant can't afford nice things
Your jokes are hilarious dood!

>>57858118
Yeah, in gayming timings matter more then bandwight, look at Fallshit 4, a slight increase in timings even when lowering the frequency will give huge performance boosts.

>>57858102
Is this what butthurt AMD cucks really believe?

>>57858453
see
>>57858136
i7 master race

File: 1480400099958.png (74KB, 230x230px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 230x230px

>>57858074
>mfw his ddr4 is worse than my ddr3 2666mhz 10 CAS

>doesn't even have 16gb

Kill yourselves.

>>57858120
>mfw typing this on a ddr-400 with P4
>CRT monitor too

>>57858102
>DDR3 is in many situations faster than DDR4
In pure latency cheap DDR3 is generally faster than cheap DDR4, however DDR4 has a MUCH higher frequency ceiling, and for the most part anything mid-range DDR4 or better is going to destroy any DDR3 except the fastest DDR3 kits, which still get destroyed by the fastest DDR4 kits.

Remember, actual latency is NOT your CAS timings, CAS timings are only part of the equation, your frequency ALSO effects your latency, so super high frequency DDR4 with slightly high CAS timings will beat lower frequency DDR3 with lower CAS timings.

File: Smug_c79fbb_5762907.jpg (31KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 640x360px

>>57858074
>he payed more for something that doesn't even make a difference

File: 1423307804369.gif (126KB, 306x220px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 306x220px

>>57858074
>mfw still running ddr3 and am3+

>mfw running that ram overclocked to cas 7 at 1600 with the cpu at 4.5ghz

File: 1451576348603.png (71KB, 212x160px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 212x160px

>not having ECC registered DDR4 memory
lol enjoy getting cucked by cosmic radiation.

>>57858074
Those sluts right there likely own a Mac so they don't even know what the fuck DDR3 means.

>>57860455
>payed

>>57858074
2*

>using skylake

>>57861018
>not using X99

>>57861028
>using Intel

>>57861028
>not using z170

File: .jpg (24KB, 546x471px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 546x471px

>tfw got 2x16GB of DDR4 for $100

File: please kys immediately.jpg (18KB, 201x207px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 201x207px

>he's paying $4/GB for RAM in December instead of paying $3/GB in July

File: lol fuck that.jpg (31KB, 600x765px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 600x765px

>>57860483
>mfw it's still bested by a stock i5 on a b150 motherboard

>>57858074
>not using SDR

File: pleb.jpg (26KB, 400x462px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 400x462px

>>57861347
>not using RDRAM with your similarly cool running pentium 4

>>57861360
too fast 4 me

>>57861048
Less cores, 5% IPC gains, and dual channel DDR4 vs dual channel DDR4 oh boy.

No thanks

>>57858074

jokes on you motherfucker, i'm using ddr2 (266 MHz)