In the end of 2016, are there any non-negligible benefits of

File: 1472436436770.jpg (94KB, 775x719px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 775x719px

>>57839224
Yeah when you're dynamically allocating namespace to hashmapped arrays with a GPU vectorised CUDA core, you have to realize that your IPC will remain constant no matter what you do short of reengineering the architecture with a longer pipeline and tree stabilizers, the best way to increase your throughput is to overclock until your mAh asynchronously provides an undercurrent to you're TDP wattage Delta in such a manner that a bigly non-negligible benefit is attained. source: I'm chief overclocker at Pepe headquarters Inc.

>>57839224
you can show off on /g/ for extra (You)s

and that's it

>>57840521
Jargon is jargon

>>57840521
That's a lot of techie words for /g/.

>>57839224
>buy 6700k
>stock max turbo up to 4.2 ghz
>you can overclock it up to 4.5-4.6
>absolutely fucking nothing

>>57839224
Better price-performance ratio

*depending on the price you paid for your CPU (and cooling solution)
**depending on the performance that the silicon lottery grants you

>>57839224

/g/ I need help. I was overclocking an old 6850 for a friend in the normal way you do it (tiny increments of 5~10hz a time before running the benchmark) and past a certain point artifacts started showing up in the entire screen, so naturally I thought this was the limit, died back the overlock and tested again. Except that now no matter what fucking clock I use, the artifacts in the entire screen are ALWAYS there in every game and the benchmark itself. How the FUCK is this even possible? I never increased the voltage to begin with, the option wasn't even available, so what the hell?

its funny you should mention staying hydrated OP i was so dehydrated on Thursday and Friday i thought i would pass out but i didntr realize it till late in the night on friday had a glass of water and it was like night and day

>>57839224
I get UTI if I don't stay well hydrated :(