/wt/ watch thread

File: IMG_20161201_151520.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

First for offbrand jumbo SKX

>>57829482
I'm wearing mine too

>>57829482

jumbo image file too, i see

not like anyone looks at this thread on mobile, i guess.

File: 1478941960230.jpg (2MB, 4886x3546px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4886x3546px

i have finally found the srp787 at a decent price, $250.

the only problem is that it is on ebay, and i hate buying anything on ebay under any circumstance

some of you people who buy watches on ebay tell me if this is alright or what, i literally have never bought anything on ebay

http://www.ebay DOT ph/itm/Seiko-Turtle-SRP787-Batman-Automatic-Divers-Watch-SRP787K1-/321893668720

>>57829515
How accurate is yours?
I was worried I would have to regulate it but it's running at a steady +2s a day.
>>57829532
Thats a really great price, especially for one of the "rarer" colors.
Go for it. If anything goes wrong ebay has pretty good buyer protection

>>57829542
holy fuck thats beautiful

>>57829580

the webpage of the guy that makes them definitely sounds like they are some special shit. what is it that's so great about them?

not asking skeptically, just out of curiosity.

>>57829550
god damn look at those bridges.

>>57829550
Now if only it wasn't $14k for the stainless version.

File: 1478315561504.jpg (308KB, 1019x1019px) Image search: [Google]

308KB, 1019x1019px

I know nothing about /wt/ thread but say I buy Timex watch is like say I love windows 10 and gaymen laptops?

>>57829627
Low profile, no sharp edges, positive spring-loaded mechanism, not a friction-fit. The only other non-oem deployant I have is by clockwork synergy because I wanted to try out what is essentially a heuer rip-off and it's a stamped piece of shit. Looked for it just now and I think I just threw it away because it is such garbage. Both cost me around $30.

>>57829698
I should have added that I have oem richemont deployants that are friction-fit. They're well-made but I think the RHD is every bit as good at 1/10th? the price of the richemont oems.

>>57829698

the strapped for time ones at least show no signs of stamping. not sure if it's investment casting plus finishing machining or CNC plus finishing machining, but no sheet metal in sight.

>>57829482
i think you meant rip off jumbo skx

>>57829554
Seems about -7 or so.

>>57829687

no, (current production) timex is like you have an 8 year old netbook that literally can't run windows 8

paradoxically, almost any watch from before 1972 is better. you'll figure it out eventually.

What does a stamped clasp in the context of a bracelet or deployant means?

>>57830196

made from cheap sheet metal and will bend until it breaks

File: 751053165_o.jpg (130KB, 1280x928px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 1280x928px

>>57830196
Stamped clasps have the folding part made out of thin sheet metal that's stamped into shape. Milled clasps, as the name implies, are milled from a thicker piece of steel and are much sturdier and higher quality generally.

>>57830239
In this case the links are made of folded sheet metal and even worse than the stamped clasp.

What's /g/'s opinion on Fossil watches?

Do you guys have an every day wear watch? I currently wear a suunto core, but am looking to change it up.

>>57830501

i wouldn't pay more than $20 for folded links, but i definitely have leather bands in my watchband drawer that are unquestionably worse than any of my folded link bracelets

>>57830525

there's never any good reason to buy fast fashion shit

>>57830541

sinn 856 utc

>>57830525
Fashion watch, i.e. made for normie consumption without care for quality.

What does it mean when a movement is overhauled?

>>57830765
usually means its completely taken apart, cleaned, reassembled, lubricated and timed.

File: MM300 3 small.jpg (186KB, 800x513px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 800x513px

I spent a long time thinking about this, and I honestly think the MarineMaster 300 is a better than the entirety of Omega's range, and is on par with the Submariner.
Anyone disagree?

>>57831014

well, it's definitely not a better chronograph than the speedmaster. you have unquestionably overreached with the claim that it exceeds the *entire* omega range. it's not even debatable.

>>57831014
If you spent a long time thinking about this, maybe you could post some arguments that led you to this conclusion?

>>57831035
I meant diver, it's 2AM..
>>57831071
The main reason why I'm in love with it is that it perfected the luxury tool watch.
The GS movement is much more refined than any of the modded ETAs that Omega uses in the seamasters, but at the same time it's rugged and you don't need to baby it despite the luxury status.
The case is finished on the same level that a luxury watch would be, but at the same time it's sturdy as fuck and is a monoblock design.
Even the hands are beveled and brushed like you would expect from a luxury dress watch, but at the same time they're wide enough to hold a substantial amount of lume.
The bezel isn't ceramic, so it's not blingy, but again, it's lacquered to a very nice level as you would expect from a luxury watch.
The crystal isn't sapphire to be shatter proof, but it's not like they used a regular mineral crystal and called it a day.
It's a double domed (with a very substantial inner dome) AR coated crystal that looks luxury but is purely tool oriented.
A lot of thought went into this watch, much more so than any diver competing with it imo.
It's a steal at 2k as well.

>>57830771
Thanks, but why do a lot of eBay sellers say not to bring your watch to a watchmaker to be serviced?

>>57831162

it's 2am here and i'm also drunk. there are more seiko movements in my house than movements by any other manufacturer and i'm still pretty sure you're wrong.

>>57831233
How so?

>>57831162

The perfected luxury-tool watch is made by Sinn. Seiko's "sturdy" is like tinfoil next to a tegimented case, and Sinn does not ship anything with mineral crystals. You have to go to Grand Seiko for anything made to the same standard.

>>57831262
I like Sinn, but their watches are ugly as fuck, and in reality, you're never going to really need a tegimented case.
The MM300 on the other hand is gorgeous, while at the same time a tool watch.

>>57831289

they are plain, not ugly.

i need the tegimented case at least twice weekly. it's not about impacts. those would smash the crystal or fuck up the movement. it's about changing straps all the time.

>>57831301
Just how shaky are your hands?
Also drilled lugs solve that issue quite nicely.

>>57831289
>you're never going to really need a tegimented case
FWIW, I've scratched a tegimented case

>>57831348
>FWIW, I've scratched a tegimented case
So what's the point then?

>>57831340

it has drilled lugs, mate. my hands don't shake or slip, but if you think you're not leaving marks on the underside of your lugs, then i've got to ask when's the last time you saw an optometrist.

>>57831370

you can scratch a sapphire crystal, too, with a hard enough object.

File: shine.jpg (220KB, 1500x1500px) Image search: [Google]

220KB, 1500x1500px

Thoughts on this?

It's the Misfit Shine with a mesh band. I like how minimal it looks and it also doubles as an activity tracker.

>>57831378
If it's gonna get scratched anyway, what's the point?
Are small scratches on the inside of the lugs such a big deal?
>>57831423
Garbage

>>57831378
damn what are your spring bars made out of

>>57829482

meme shit

>>57831423
Looks like a Ziiiro watch

File: new_seiko_prospex_classic_divers_200m_automatic_srp787k1__srp789k1_man_watch_1460635011_27c6839e[1].jpg (77KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 640x640px

>>57829532

Just got a 789, paid $300 for it only becuase that one seems to be hard to locate for some reason, just like the 787

Ebay I never worry about becuase if it doesnt show up in the amount of time they give you buyer protection (via paypal) make a claim.

I have ordered seikos from Malaysians and Japs and never had an issue. High seller ratings and tons of reviews are usually a good indicator that you wont get fucked. Most ship EMS express with tracking and signature confirmation too.

File: 14805402514200.jpg (89KB, 801x553px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 801x553px

>>57829389
Are there any interesting JDM Seiko 5s?

File: a158wea-9.3.jpg (115KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 600x600px

bump

File: 2Expensive.jpg (1MB, 3356x1919px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3356x1919px

Just paid $300 for this, how'd I do?

Also, should I buy that Orient Trooper on Massdrop? Seems like a good deal.

>>57832835
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3YwBxw8MUKU

Will someone post the current poorfag guide?

Also, is it generally a bad idea to buy vintage watches?

>>57830541
Currently a Seiko SNK803. I'll be changing it for a Damasko DA38 at some point.

File: IMG_20161204_124109.jpg (2MB, 3456x4608px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3456x4608px

baby's first watch /g/, how did I do?

>>57833064
too big famalam

>>57833101
yup, got that feeling.

>>57833101
that's an understatement

Hello gentlemen

For Christmas I'll buy 2 watches for myself.

Ive narrowed it down to 4 models. Wich one would you exclude, which one would you get?

- Seagull 1963 38mm: this one i'll get for sure

- Sarb033 or 035

- citizen bm8180

- Hamilton khaki auto

>>57833906
Sarb033

>>57833101
It's used as boxer on the weekend in the pub.

>>57832108

yeah probably overreacting but im really worried about there being like one small imperfection like a hairline scratch or something and having to fight it out to get a replacement or refund, or having a problem a few months later

What's the catch with these beautiful and affordable hand-wound USSR watches anyways?

>>57834124
>hand-wound
>USSR watches?
Answered your own question there fampai.

>>57833906
I'd get the sarb and the hamilton.

File: wrist shots.png (1014KB, 1241x581px) Image search: [Google]

1014KB, 1241x581px

>left:
-Ariel Adams
-slightly over 6.5" wrist

>right:
-guy from WIAA watch reviews
-claims to have a 7.25" wrist

These wrists are clearly almost identical in size.

Why do people lie about their wrist size?

>>57833906
SARB & Citizen. If you are insistent on getting the Seagull then get that & the SARB then get the Citizen for your next watch.

>>57833064

>What time is it
>Black

File: 1458486450518.png (3MB, 1600x4200px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1600x4200px

>>57832972
this is the most recent afaik

>>57834557

Isn't mid range usually around $3000 in the watch world ?

>>57834569
It's "midrange affordable"

>>57834557
Is there a guide for a tier above "midrange affordable"?

File: 1477198377861.png (1MB, 818x1079px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 818x1079px

>>57834697

File: 1452826472094.png (147KB, 268x401px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 268x401px

>>57834569
>Isn't mid range usually around $3000 in the watch world ?

Yes, that watch guide is recommending absolute dogshit. Those "affordable" ETA watches they list in the mid-range are literally the worst watches you can buy they have no resale value whatsoever, you will have to spend about as much as you paid for it if it ever needs a service, it has no horological value or prestige associated with it, it will still set you back a few hundred, all while often having iffy water resistance and actual timekeeping accuracy.

I mean christ just buy a fucking Timex if you want something that looks nice and keeps (very good) time. If you want something truly luxurious and a good piece of crafstmanship, save up for a used Grand Seiko, Rolex, Tudor, etc.

And if you just want something with some horological value and a beautiful movement (while not being necessarily being very luxurious or even practical), you can pick up Waltham, Elgin, Hamilton, etc. pocket watches on ebay for a couple hundred dollars.

Either go poorfag Timex or richfag Rolex, anything in the middle is just a waste of money and you should feel bad if you ever convince someone to buy one.

>>57834697
save up a little more.

>>57834697
No, that would be dumb.

>>57834744
>>57834717
>>57834758

Are you guys hungover or something?

I'm asking for a guide with some good watches in the tier above midrange affordable.

What don't you understand?

>>57834766
Just buy a rollie senpai.

File: 2016-12-04-145843.jpg (46KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 640x480px

Hey i would like to start moding my watches but i dont know where to buy cheap tools
Can somone recomend me were to buy non trash tools?

>>57834789
The "midrange affordable" tier is priced around 500.
A rolex costs about ten times as much, so I'd say rollies are a few tiers above "midrange affordable".

>>57834766
It doesn't exist, any watches more expensive will be a shitload lot more expensive or overpriced. Buy one of those midafford ones or spend more money on a real watch.

>>57834827
There are no watches priced between 500 and full-blown Swiss?

Do you have brain problems, or is Sunday your "talk shit out my ass" day?

>>57834856
>There are no watches priced between 500 and full-blown Swiss?

Grand Seiko.

>>57834898
There are no watches priced between 500 and Grand Seiko?

>>57834903
seiko brightz.

File: plump with child blood.jpg (90KB, 422x594px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 422x594px

>>57834903

They're literally all shit. Again, just buy a fucking Timex or stop being stingy.

>>57834912
>>57834898
>>57834918
>>57834827
>>57834789
>>57834758
>>57834744
>>57834717
Jesus christ, the shitposting is real.

>>57834928
You are the only one shitposting. There is no watch between those that will be better than any of the midrange affordable ones unless you want to spend real money, which you are clearly too poor to do.

You fucking narcissistic jew.

>>57834928
Did you expect you'd get serious replies after asking a dumb question and following it up by acting rude?

>>57834953
>There is no watch between those that will be better than any of the midrange affordable ones unless you want to spend real money
So there are no good watches around 1k-2k?
Watches that offer definite advantages over 500$ watches?

If you have no idea what you're talking about, just don't reply.

>>57834960
How was my question dumb?

File: when the memes hit you.jpg (171KB, 1520x1604px) Image search: [Google]

171KB, 1520x1604px

>>57834987
>So there are no good watches around 1k-2k?

Not really. Virtually eveything in that price range is ETA based and almost 100% of them charge that much based on clever marketing, not because of appreciable differences in quality relative to the $300-500 watches. Oris is probably the genuinely nicest in that price range but even then you're just pissing money away. If you can afford something that costs $1000-2000 then you can obviously just wait longer and get something $3000+, which is when you get into actual luxury watches that hold value, have in-house movements, and have some prestige amongst watch enthusiasts and women you're trying to impress.

>Watches that offer definite advantages over 500$ watches?

>>57834124
Commies made a shit ton of them real cheap.

They're terrible movements. But cheap.

>>57835047
>They're terrible movements.

I don't doubt you, but can you elaborate about their quality.

I've never owned one and was wanting to get one for fun.

>>57834766
>MOTFM
>O
>T
>F
>M

>>57834987
>there are no good watches around 1k-2k

Well you are free to buy a meme Apple watch or other smartwatch that love to release shit in this price range to gullible idiots like you who think they are actually getting a good "expensive" but is actually just overpriced shit.

>>57835044
So what about the Christopher Ward C8?
Or the some of those Seiko SARW watches (under 1k, nicer movement and materials and finishing than SARB), or the new transocean, or the marinemaster?

This is off the top of my head, and keep in mind I was the one asking for examples in this price range.

>If you can afford something that costs $1000-2000 then you can obviously just wait longer and get something $3000+
Chriiiiiiiist.

>>57835091
Shitpost of the day award.

>>57835044
Why do people write articles for that shit? Like I can't figure on my own what to do when I'm doing to my death
Also Orient Mako blue or black?

>>57831222
>buy the watch but dont look inside stupid goy

movement is probably shit and destroyed. Watchmaker will tell you the thing is trash, most likely.

Nice trips

>>57835058
I handled ones that keep horrible time, hands pop off and winding stems that yank right out.

Gommies didn't catalogue their movements. Good luck trying to find replacement parts.

But you can get a newish hand wind for like 30 smackeroos. Not that bad.

>>57835146
>Chriiiiiiiist.

Nigger I make $13 an hour working in a factory and I own a Rolex. It's not hard if you squirrel away money by, say, not drinking coffee or whatever other expensive vices you like spending money on.

>So what about the Christopher Ward C8?
>Or the some of those Seiko SARW watches (under 1k, nicer movement and materials and finishing than SARB), or the new transocean, or the marinemaster?

Look, just fucking buy it if you really, really want it and it will make you happy. They all work just fine in that price range, the same as pretty much every watch Casio and up.

>>57835248
>Look, just fucking buy it if you really, really want it and it will make you happy.
My question wasn't "should I buy".
My question was "what are some good watches in the price range above 500$".

You're welcome for the lesson.

>>57835198
>Also Orient Mako blue or black?

Black. The nice, big, applied numerals and hour markers will really pop with a clean, contrasting white background. Plus you get a lot more versatility with the black if you put it on a matching leather strap as it can be passable in a suit or other formal occasion, while the blue can't.

>>57835279
>what are some good watches in the price range above 500

Those watches start at $3000.

>>57835279
Don't listen to these elitists. They hate on anyone who doesn't go into debt buying their expensive jewelry.

Most of the watches in that price range are really quality pieces, particularly in case design and finish work.

If I were you I would find a reputable authorized dealer and get a Tag Heuer, preferably a Monaco.

>>57835146
>Christopher Ward C8?
>Or the some of those Seiko SARW watches (under 1k, nicer movement and materials and finishing than SARB), or the new transocean, or the marinemaster?

Guess what, none are significantly better than those at $500, and pale in comparison to the ones at $3000. How can you be this fucking dumb.

File: tag huehue.png (53KB, 130x181px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 130x181px

>>57835335

>>57834317
Insecurity. Having bitch wrists in the watch autismo world is like being a manlet irl.

>>57834918
Jesus, what the fuck happened to Jontron?

>>57834557
Tfw when no bagelsport in a guide

>>57835198
that one is fake. it's a quote from the Hitchhiker's guide to the Galaxy movie

>>57835279
I feel like I will get yelled at for saying this, but Sinn has offerings from 1k-2k that are worthwhile. I feel like if I had 1500 burning a hole in my pocket and couldn't wait to afford more, I would look for a vintage datejust or oyster perpetual, and try to wait for a steal on one in decent conditon.

File: dynamic.jpg (169KB, 1200x1600px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 1200x1600px

>NOS
>750 yurobux
Should I do it, /g/?

>>57835901

It looks a little shoddy m8.

>>57835901
Hideous

>>57833906
sarb035

>>57834317
angles

>>57835198
>Also Orient Mako blue or black?
Ray or Mako USA, not Mako.
And blue. Although black isn't a bad choice.

>>57835701
bagelsport is an old meme. they're hard too find and expensive now.

>>57835901
If you like the design go for it. Seems a bit cheap for an actual NOS, be wary.

>>57835333
No they don't.

For less than 200$ more than a SARB, you can get a Seiko with a higher-beat movement, better finish, and better materials.
Just as a for instance.

>>57836083
Don't talk shit about the normal mako, it's great.

File: IMG_20161204_170601.jpg (1MB, 3145x3137px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3145x3137px

After two days of wear, I can say I'm really happy with my Borealis isofake. If for some reason you wanted an Isofrane-style rubber strap, this one is a very good one.
It's well made, comfortable and looks pretty good (if you're into that design). Would buy again.

>>57834766
People here have no idea about that price range. It would literally just be Tudor and Nomos on that list. Maybe a vintage Grand Seiko

>>57836138
it would be great if the bezel wasn't so terrible.

>>57836184
What do you mean? Aside from the slightly different font it's the same.

>>57836172
You forgot Sinn and Damasko.

>>57836193
the font looks ridiculously bad.

File: s-l1600.jpg (245KB, 1239x831px) Image search: [Google]

245KB, 1239x831px

Hello /wt/
Can someone drop e advice where to order clasp like the one on this bracelet?
http://www.ebay.com/itm/22mm-Curved-end-Heavy-Solid-Brushed-Stainless-Steel-Watch-Bracelet-200mm-Diver-/371797871143?hash=item5690e14a27:g:FFYAAOSw-kdXw1dj

>>57835343
>Guess what, none are significantly better than those at $500
Let's compare the SARW011 to a 500$ SARB:
-higher-beat movement
-better materials/finish (enamel)
-more/better complications (power reserve, dial date)

For only a couple 100$ more.

>pale in comparison to the ones at $3000
Completely irrelevant, and untrue.

~1000$ Seikos are often just as nice or sometimes even nicer than 3k Swiss offerings.

>>57836215
If you think so, sure, but that kind of subjective thing is no reason not to recommend it.

>>57836103
Yea, now that I look there's a bit of gunk in the ridges of the crown.

>>57836220
Strapcode sells them.

>>57836226
No, it is. If you buy it you would look at it on your wrist and go "what was i thinking, this looks awful, better kill myself now"

>>57836246
Yeah but he should be able to figure that out on his own, he's the one wearing it. The font looks fine to me for instance.

File: IMG_20161116_131334.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>57833064
Thats really big on you

File: seiko-solar-stainless-steel-black-dial-chronograph-watch-ssc229p1-haveatry-1405-29-haveatry@3.jpg (64KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 800x600px

if I don't want a mechanical, is the Seiko Solar a good option?

>>57836514
citizen ecodrive and casio solar are ok too
if you want a chrono, seiko mecaquartz are interesting as well
or just a good old regular quartz, from like timex seiko or casio

>>57836537
>>57836514
Bulova Accutron II or Precisionist too.

>>57836537
>>57836577
That's a lot to look at, thanks

>>57836514
if you are going quartz you might as well go for something fun like a chrono or perpetual calendar.

>>57835201
Shit, so this is a no go?
http://www.ebay.com/ (ITM) /112224077905

>>57834317
You can have an flat and wide wrist or a round one, youre welcome for the lesson nigger

>>57837370

Thank you , you piece of shit

>>57837297
It's saying that if you open the caseback/have it serviced, you can't return it.

>>57837741

How the fuck do they know if you open the caseback?

>>57837297
what the hell is up with the indices? 7 and 8 especially.

>>57837942
they're just trying everything they can to get away with not refunding a shit item

>>57837976
mb, those were just the crystal distorting things. Still weird that 6,9, and 12 have nothing.

>>57837297
>http://www.ebay.com/ (ITM) /112224077905

What the fuck is this? What kind of address has paranteces and spaces?

>>57838959
have you tried removing them genius

File: 1468158884790.jpg (1MB, 3001x1951px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3001x1951px

>>57838959

ebay links aren't filtered or banned I don't know why people keep fucking doing this

>>57829389
Hey guys, I need a watch that is under $40 max with the below wants.

>analog and digital both
>must look cool with both leather and chain

Also, I know nothing about watches but I know you guys give the best choices.

File: ecodrive.png (991KB, 889x1086px) Image search: [Google]

991KB, 889x1086px

Is eco-drive a gimmick or actually useful?

>>57839140

some sort of gshock or casio that isn't gshock that has the features of gshock for cheaper

>>57839140
literally doesn't exist
>>57839186
solar watches
i guess it's useful? you don't have to change the battery every like 5 years... not really a huge deal. but you're not likely to keep a watch that cheap for 20 years anyway

>>57839069
Why would someone post a link where you need to remove characters?

>>57839089
They are idiots I guess.

>>57836168

I don't like the one that came with my memesplorer because it's fucking huge.

>>57839186
Pretty useful.

File: IMG_6796.jpg (2MB, 3024x4032px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3024x4032px

Just picked up this special edition Rolex, what do you guys think?

>>57840172
Fake. Everyone knows a real Date Dweller has the date at 6 & 9 too.

>>57840172
>>57840201

Back to the Noob factory

>>57840172
This is great

File: 1462137090061.jpg (161KB, 610x610px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 610x610px

>>57840172

File: IMG_5549.jpg (1MB, 2448x3264px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2448x3264px

This watch is a very special timepiece. when i bought this watch is like putting money in the safe deposit box, in one year, i will keep having my 5000 dollars

>>57840563
Rolexes lose value all the same you know.

File: 1449251967665.jpg (334KB, 1934x1747px) Image search: [Google]

334KB, 1934x1747px

>>57840563
>he thinks some one will pay $5000 for his used rolex

Lmao, you would've done better buying gold with that money. At least gold is almost guaranteed to hold it's value against inflation.

>>57840650
>>57840639
Did you look at the picture? You really ought to look closer.

>>57840563
Are those lugs...Odd...Or is there something 'else' in my Gin?

>>57830239
Pic. looks very much like what I have used daily for 10 years. Are there fatigue problems??

>>57831423
I like the minimalist style, but
>look, no hands!

Also that band looks like it will uproot every strand of hair on your writs.

>>57835279
You can never go wrong with Speedmaster.

>>57840662
What kind of shop is that? Chunks of the bezel have been chopped off and the lugs don't make any sense.

>>57841232
I didn't make it, I was just pointing out that the poster was going for sarcasm by including an obviously exaggerated photo.

File: watch-club-rolex-submariner-date-latest-model-ceramic-bezel-48997-402x402.jpg (139KB, 402x402px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 402x402px

Whats the best homage of this Cermic sub?

I can only find the Davosa but its like the old one but with an ugly bezel.... No steinhart since the date window is cancer and its too big.

File: 1462315380643.jpg (32KB, 447x456px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 447x456px

>>57842100
>completely smooth crown

>>57842100
hope it didn't cost more than $10

>>57833064
that's a really big watch

[spoiler] for you [/spoiler]

>>57840563
bait

>>57829532
Thanks for the share. I inquired about shipping. If its cheap enough I'm gettjbt one. I've bought 8+ watches from eBay now incl my big money purchases so don't worry my friend its a good place to buy. Enjoy

>>57841565
Invicta pro diver is pgood

>>57835901
Dang that is cool

i i buy one seiko 5 with a 7s26, that isn't the snk809, and want to keep it for a long time, would it even be worth it? how often would i need to service it, every five years?

what i mean is, would the service costs outweigh the entry-level cost, or do these things usually last for a while? i am aware that the 7s26 has only been around for a couple decades now, but that should be enough time to provide some word of mouth advice?

>>57842197

the minimalism autists love that shit for some reason. the best way to understand them is that they don't really like watches, and they wear these things out of spite for those of us who do.

>>57843884

7s26 is serviceable, but you might find that your most economical approach is to just let your watchmaker drop a fresh 7s26 movement in when the time comes.

File: WUTTT.jpg (59KB, 655x527px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 655x527px

Can anyone share some recommendations on nice watches for the girlfriend.

Mechanical/Automatic/Solar/Quartz... I just want something that provides decent value/$.

Between 100-350 dollars.

>>57845456
Get a quartz for starters. Most women don't want to bother with autistic mechanicals.

>>57845491
I read that people said this in the past. She knows my passion with watches and likes the idea of having a mechanical, she seems to think shes going to wind it daily, I tend to think otherwise. She currently has an ecodrive and has been wearing it daily for years, so it's super beat up. The mineral crystal is beat to shit.
So ideally I think she would benefit from something with a sapphire crystal.

What's a reasonable price to pay for an skx009k2 in 8/10 condition?

>>57841565
Probably a sterile parnis with miyota 9015 movement and ar coated sapphire crystal.

>>57842100
where to cop?

File: 1460906446702.jpg (89KB, 960x704px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 960x704px

i've always hung around in the sub 500$ range so I have no idea, why does everyone hate the ceramic bezels on the new rolexes? I can understand the maxi dial and wider lug hate but the ceramic dial isn't immediately self explanatory

File: IMG_20161205_242309125_HDR.jpg (2MB, 3006x5344px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3006x5344px

r8 me

>>57845683
Get something from Orient - the best affordable decent quality ladies mechanicals.

File: original-seagull-m171s-automatic-classic-tourbillon-watch-retrograde-month-date-312891da4e8d6fe075960f55ff4129d5.jpg (42KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 400x400px

Hey all, this watch is on sale on massdrop. Do you think its worth the price?

https://www.massdrop.com/buy/seagull-819-317-watch

File: 1475172748039.jpg (64KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 1280x720px

>>57846869

File: SAM_0080.jpg (873KB, 1521x1140px) Image search: [Google]

873KB, 1521x1140px

Built my first watch last night. Uses an ETA 6497-1 movement.

File: SAM_0081.jpg (921KB, 1521x1140px) Image search: [Google]

921KB, 1521x1140px

>>57847022
I need to open it up and fix the smudges I missed when I cased it, but aside from that I'm very pleased.

File: 1453338765763.jpg (1MB, 2048x1152px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x1152px

>>57843343
>>57829532
>>57832108


i asked about shipping to NY and he wants 311$ total for the watch + shipping

that's kind of higher than I was expecting, I don't know if I will get it now. is this par for the course for buying from an ebay seller in asia? 61 fucking dollars?

>>57846372
Are you wearing the skin of Cookie Monster?

>>57837370
Watching the actual vids, it sure doesn't seem like the guy on the right has a "rounder" wrist than the guy on the left.

>>57845456
Vtg omega or longines desu

File: s-SSVM015_b_1024x1024.jpg?v=1476765120.jpg (90KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 1024x768px

>>57845456
I like those Lukia watches by Seiko.
All around 300$ on Seiya.

Pic related is the cheapest at 280$.

>>57847022
>>57847035
congrats, now you can open up your heritage boutique brand and sell them for 500-1000, just make sure to write a long promotional piece about how much history the watches have

>>57839242
Yeah that's what I read about them. Since I have a small wrist, it would have looked dumb on me. On this one I already use one of the furthest holes.

>>57843884
A watch under $100 isn't really worth servicing. You can just buy a new one for the price of the service.
If you're attached to it, you can also as >>57844461 said drop a new movement in.
A 7s26 will keep ticking for more than 10 years without a service. The 5 year interval makes sense if you are going to service it though. It's literally like oil changes in a car. You can miss them and it will keep running, but if you want your engine to stay healthy, just do them.

>>57846186
Won't fade for muh vintage look

>>57847022
Damn those are some big hands.

>>57845456
Get that cute Orient where the flower and fairy's dress change colors.

>>57847022
>>57847985
Looks like an oversized necktie swinging around.

File: SAM_0082.jpg (894KB, 1521x1140px) Image search: [Google]

894KB, 1521x1140px

>>57847985
>>57848002
Yeah, I actually kind of fucked up on the hands, but the stock Otto Frei has for hands that fit on this movement is kind of limited, especially if I wanted a matching seconds hand with lume. It's not so bad normally, that picture kind of exacerbates it.

File: 1480425566973.jpg (17KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 400x400px

>>57834495

>>57845456
Get her a nice Invicta she'll love it

>>57847985
For you

I see that most watches with a moonphase complication jave ot in a horizontal latout. What are some watches with a vertical moonphase indicator?

File: slav_girl_with_710SE.jpg (101KB, 660x960px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 660x960px

>>57845456
Vostok Amphibia.

>>57847022
>>57848027

The hilarious part is that this looks like that 'swiss trained, american made' junk that guy was trying to sell for $2000.

https://weisswatchcompany.com/collections/all

>>57847022
Good job, /wt/ needs guys like you. What will be the next step?

>>57848606
what?

if you are asking what I think you are, you'll just have to look around. Moon phases can be put on in any orientation and it is up to the watchmaker to choosee, I don't know of any that are fully sideways but I know some pieces will slant it 45 degrees

>>57848851
The band will take a couple weeks to break in, so I'll need to wait until then to decide whether I need to get something more comfortable, and I would like to replace the hands with ones that stand out a bit less, but long-term I would like to get an ETA 2836-2 and build a day-date watch, but I don't even know where to source a genuine one.

File: 1464745444903.jpg (339KB, 1002x810px) Image search: [Google]

339KB, 1002x810px

>>57847065
someone answer this pls its bugging the shit out me.

the guys message was
>our shipping fee and other administrative costs for international shipping is around 3500PHP (61$) for this item.

is 61$ shipping from philippines to ny normal for ebay? if so how is aliexpress only charging a few bucks for their garbage watches shipping.

i dont use ebay ever so just help me out here

>>57848967
Shipping on ebay is almost entirely up to the seller, so it varies wildly. International shipping is almost always expensive.

China, and (i think) India get government-subsidized shipping for international exports, which is why they can mail you a 99-cent watch with free shipping.

I wouldn't say $61 is shady for international shipping, but it is rather high for an item so light. I would have expected ~$20 shipping.

>>57847997
>where the flower and fairy's dress change colors
Please do tell more.

Also: are there other watches where the face changes over time and not just to indicate time? I vaguely remember once having seen one with a changing pattern but that was a long, long time ago.

>>57848925
Ebay has some. Then again they're Hong-Kong sellers, but I doubt they'd go as far as stamping ETA markings on Chinese clone movements.

>>57849056
I don't actually know if it changes over time or if it's the pusher, but I know that it looks super cute. Look for "orient fairy watch", it exists in different colours.

The Orient Disk kind of changes over time too.

>>57849111
>>57849056
If you meant this, I doubt it'll be appropriate for his gf unless he's dating a 12-year old

File: SAM_0086.jpg (890KB, 1521x1140px) Image search: [Google]

890KB, 1521x1140px

>>57848851
Actually, I just noticed some machining marks on the balance cock while I was de-fingerprinting the ratchet wheel, so replacing the surface plates with polished ones might be a cool project. I don't have the kind of skill or equipment to do engine turning, so I might look into having the bare plates machined, and then cook up a little dremel rig to guilloche them. Not gonna touch the stock plates though.

>>57849104
I have actually seen clone movements with the ETA logo stamped on them, so I can't really trust sellers shipping out of china to provide genuine OEM stuff anymore, but getting a Seagull clone wouldn't be the worst thing in the world, I suppose.

File: article-2221520-0018417C00000258-616_634x456.jpg (41KB, 634x456px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 634x456px

>>57849137
>unless he's dating a 12-year old

File: 4sbPiVC.jpg (98KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 1000x667px

>>57849137
>>57849111
>>57845456
I'd recommend an Orient Soma. Was going to get one for my gf but she refused to wear watches fearing she'd lose it.

Forgot link.
orient-watch.com/feature/happy_stream_collection/fairy/

>>57849111
Interesting, thanks for the info.

I think designers would to well to pursue such finesses. For instance readability of a face differs with lighting throughout the day and changing colours would help a lot.

>>57849209
Well, watches are mostly jewelry nowadays. Readability isn't paramount for most luxury watches, and inexpensive watches can't really afford to include brand new complications.

>>57849190
38mm is not a bad size and the dial is nice, what makes this a definite women's watch and not unisex? The small lug width?

>>57849160
I'm still mad that this guy basically got away with it.

>>57849219
>Readability isn't paramount for most luxury watches,
I have noticed and I think this is rather annoying. At least some PP watches are readable, and all George Daniel designs are awesome.

>and inexpensive watches can't really afford to include brand new complications.
Afford or just intellectual laziness?

The market is wide open for new thinking. Watchanon, are you still here?

>>57848711
I bet she has bigger wrists than most of the autists in this thread

I am looking for a watch for my girlfriend.
She would like to have a watch but nothing really fancy (as she's not that kind of person).

She likes the design of Junghans and NOMOS.

Does anyone have some recommendations?

>>57849590
>there are people here who consider a 710 Amphibia large
Two-thirds of /wt/ suffers from body-image disorder. It's literally my daily.

>>57849597
http://www.aliexpress.com/item/32717337373/32717337373.html

>>57849683
maybe a little bit fancier!

>>57849757
Trust me, unless she knows about watches she'll think it's fantastic. It even says Geneve on the dial so it must be Swiss.

Alternatively try to find one of the Daniel Wellington fakes on Aliexpress, she'll think it cost far more and the quality will be about the same.

File: elektronika_408.jpg (155KB, 800x772px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 800x772px

Alright, batterymonkey anon here. So there's a radio-sync clock on our desk that we're supposed to use for checking the daily/weekly rates of mechanical/quartz watches. But the structure of the mall blocks the DCF-77 signal completely so it eventually starts to drift (now it's -2s from atomic) and displays weird shit like Nov. 31. This is unacceptable when you're trying to measure daily rates.

So I started a project of building an NTP-synced clock. It involves a single PCB VT-100 compatible terminal that connects to my Linux box on my bench through serial cable on one end and my late grand peps Elektronika 408 B&W mini TV on the other (pic is not mine, but it's the exact make and color).

So the way this works is that the TV displays a text-based clock like aclock, tty-clock or clockywock like an old Unix dumb-terminal. I already did some testing with aclock through a serial cable at 9600 baud, it remains completely synced with atomic time, in fact it turns out to be closer to accurate time than XFCE's own taskbar clock.

Actually building the machine is still like a month away, but wish me luck anyway!

>>57849597
what kind of money are you looking to spend?

>>57849848
Godspeed anon.

>>57849848
>So there's a radio-sync clock on our desk that we're supposed to use for checking the daily/weekly rates of mechanical/quartz watches. But the structure of the mall blocks the DCF-77 signal completely so it eventually starts to drift
that's so fucking ridiculous lmao

>>57849869
For some reason radio clocks are absolutely shit at timekeeping when they can't receive a time signal for a longer period of time. Do manufacturers just put their defective quartz crystals into them, I don't know.

I though about building a DCF-77 transmitter inside the store, but I only found plans/programs that generate the time the user specifies, and not actually convert NTP. Plus it might be illegal.

>>57849859
100-500€ maybe

>>57849916
Why not just get a Twin penis Quartz?
Supposed to be Accurate to 15s a year i think

>>57849597
There are some chink Parnis on aliexpress

Why not a SARB?

>>57850276
Not good enough. When you have to test daily rates it's safest to use a clock that syncs with UTC at least a few times a day and its drift between syncs remains well within the limits of human perception.

>>57849597
Maybe Rodina or one of the other Sea-Gull watches in that style? Tisell might also work for that matter.

>>57849916
>>57849848
Just setup bannana pi with either systemd or a cron job to sync to NTP ever so often.

>>57845744
Where do i find one with 9015?

File: oscilloscope_clock.jpg (462KB, 1608x983px) Image search: [Google]

462KB, 1608x983px

>>57850520
And what do I display it on? Besides it would be way over budget, at that price I could just buy a small TFT screen with HDMI and be done with it.

Also I want something unique. I looked at oscilloscope clocks, but none of the circuit designs allowed for network syncing. Also an oscilloscope would be too big, and I bet their power consumption is huge.

>>57850571
That's a fucking great looking device anon
The 80's need to come back
Anyway you could either get a cheapo 3' LCD from ali and hook it up or get a $50 PocketCHIP and stick it on a wall.

>>57850571
>Besides it would be way over budget

Yes, building stuff yourself is pretty much always more expensive than when a factory does it.

Considering there's 76 posters here (lets assume 30 of us used a phone as well) so there's about 50 unique posters.
Would you faggots be interested in a team speak or skype group thing were we can fling shit about watches on VOIP?
I'm also thinking of starting a watch podcast so if any anons are willing that would be pretty cool.

File: oscilloscope_oml-2m.jpg (231KB, 2000x1333px) Image search: [Google]

231KB, 2000x1333px

>>57850646
Scope not mine. I have one of these (pic also not mine). Though I'm not really a qualified EE, that slav scope was also my grandfathers.

File: eaglemoss_flieger.jpg (28KB, 700x700px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 700x700px

>>57850669
No.

>>57850669
i'm sure reddit would love that.

>>57850697
why

>>57849848
Are you a rusanon? Will Bridgestone my watches to you

>>57850571
>Also I want something unique
You can get a lot of cheap compact stuff at Adafruit including tiny screens.

>>57850669
Sounds like something reddit would appreciate

File: Tudor-Black-Bay-79230-new-2016.jpg (357KB, 1600x865px) Image search: [Google]

357KB, 1600x865px

Why do people only ever talk about the Tudor Pelagos, and not the Tudor Black Bay?

Is it because it's too much of a Rolex "hommage"?

>>57850843
No, just got a lot of slavshit laying around from the Warsaw-Pact era.

>>57850868
Too late now, already ordered the stuff. Besides it's not as cyberpunk as a small B&W commie TV.

>>57850900
>>57850794
So?
It's not like we're suddenly gonna start liking meme wellington and telling each other to wear shit in good health.
Think Top Gear, except the hatred will be genuine.

>>57850905
It's the exact opposite actually, the pelagos never gets posted here, despite being a better watch than the sub.
Still though,
>that riveted bracelet
Diamonds

>>57850905
Because a diver with no crown guards just looks weird m80.

File: Eterna-Super-KonTiki-1273-watch-27.jpg (195KB, 999x568px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 999x568px

>>57850953
U gay.

>>57850905
The Black Bay Bronze is one of the coolest watches in the Rolex family, and I'm going to bet it will be a serious collector's item in the future.

>>57851001
I never said bad. Just weird is all.

If it came to it, I'd have the BB over the pelagos simply for the crown guards if nothing else. Call me silly if needs be, just preferences. I work near loose cables and edges all day, so for me not to catch the crown on anything is nice.

Recessed crown at 4 > Crown at 8 > crown guards at 3.
The objective truth

Just ordered:

- Citizen BM8180
- Seagull 1963

Feels good man

>>57850905
>Why do people only ever talk about the Tudor Pelagos, and not the Tudor Black Bay?
is it reverse day already?

>>57851026
>Bronze
>"Nice Fossil watch, bro"

>>57850905
Because the black bay is ugly

File: 1130160012c-1.jpg (922KB, 2118x2361px) Image search: [Google]

922KB, 2118x2361px

Anybody know what watches have the same second hands as the Vostok Amphibia?

>>57852247
Such a dandy Vostok

File: (cant wake up).jpg (12KB, 173x197px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 173x197px

>new clickspring clock episode
>it's the last one

File: tale of two watches.jpg (72KB, 886x695px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 886x695px

Reason to buy the one on the left for 150€ instead of the one on the right for 4€?

>>57853095
the metal markers?
i'm sure if you spent 15€ you could get something that's just as good as left. the right one does look cheap.

>>57845456
Why don't you try fucking off to /b/ where you belong, frogposter?

>>57846372
what the fuck is that?

cyb/9

>>57850905
what does "officially certified" mean?

>>57853350
"Chronometer" is a standard for timekeeping under various circumstances.
It requires official "chronometer" certification to be able to put "chronometer" on your dial.
So placing "chronometer" AND "officially certified" is kind of redundant if you think about it.

Doesn't mean non-"chronometer" watches can't be much more accurate though.

>>57853350
the accuracy was tested by a third party and found to be within their "chronometer" specifications.
most often it will be COSC doing the testing for swiss watches.

File: chrome_2016-12-05_19-39-39.png (532KB, 1075x716px) Image search: [Google]

532KB, 1075x716px

Orient Trooper Automatic
Orient 46B45 21
Case diameter: 42 mm
I've small wrists.
I'm pretty sure that I won't find this watch here but I'm affraid that it will be too big for my wrist.
Should I order it anyway?

>>57829389

>compensations

>>57853495
it's pretty big. if you have a 7" circumference you should be good though, the lugs aren't very long.

>>57853587
I've like 6,5" 16,5 cm

>>57853658
that probably is pushing it a bit then. it will definitely look like a big watch, but that's what some people are into... and it won't be as bad as the Diesel dinner plates some people wear on their wrists.
if you have more classic tastes you just shouldn't get that one.

File: IMG_2669.jpg (908KB, 2239x2985px) Image search: [Google]

908KB, 2239x2985px

hey guys, so i have had this watch for half a year, and it's a love-hate relationship, hate mostly because i often find it uncomfortable due to the hard metal body (coming from a gshock, had it for almost a decade)

also now in the winter, my arm doesn't sweat at all and the watch keeps on sliding up and down.

could a different armband fix the discomfort and sliding?

would it make sense to replace the current armband with one like this: http://www.ebay.de/itm/Uhrenarmband-Passend-Seiko-Citizen-Kautschuk-Schwarz-18-20-22mm-Divers-Armband-/291253590588

or maybe something nato?

Any ideas for a racing inspired/themed PVD/DLC watch for under 1k? Doesn't have to be a chrono.

Decent WR if possible as well (enough to go for a swim with at least)

File: theoandharris.png (992KB, 1752x1244px) Image search: [Google]

992KB, 1752x1244px

I want to have sex with him so fucking badly

>>57853801
Black rubber will just make you sweat even more and become even more slippery when wet.

A nato is what you want

>>57853969
but how do i make sure its "good" quality? something like this? https://www.amazon.de/Gemony-Armband-Premium-Ballistic-Uhrenarmband/dp/B01N8ZM7KR

if not this one, do you know any good offers in europe?

Guy just came into a store and had a conversation with the front person.

>This watch cost more than my house
>The only thing it's supposed to do is tell time and it doesn't do it very well
>Don't buy a Rolex

Every normie who has ever purchased a Rolex.

File: IMG_6824.jpg (2MB, 3024x4032px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3024x4032px

>mfw my chronometer is officially certified

>>57853801
>the watch keeps on sliding up and down.
then make the bracelet shorter

>>57854254

>calling people normies

Anyone who uses that term is either a delusional neckbeard or autist who can't fit in with normal society and uses the word as a justification to feel special, unique or part of a fantasy reality they've engrossed themselves in as an act of desperate self endunlgence. Unless you've achieved something significant that sets you apart or defines you as being special or different from the rest of us then i have some bad news for you.

File: IMG_20161205_160109.jpg (2MB, 4160x2336px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4160x2336px

Got it today. What do you guys think?

>>57853871
>PVD/DLC
come on why you gotta do this
In plain steel, the Autodromo Group B probably has the best case out there. Their Prototipo chrono isn't too bad either, but it's a mecaquartz.

>>57854454
This isn't reddit.

>>57854454

*indulgence

sorry typo

File: IMG_20161205_160136.jpg (2MB, 4160x2336px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4160x2336px

>>57854463
Hmmm

>>57854463
Completely bad ass.

>>57854254
His house costs less than a Rolex?

>>57854454
chill out it's literally just a meme

>>57854310
is that text on the rehaut actually there or is this another shop? that looks too bad to be real

>>57854463
sweet. is the crystal scratched?

>>57853495
you'll probably find it too large

>>57853095
Just buy a fake chinese Daniel Wellington, they are usually the same quality movements and look completely the same.

>>57854510
Yea, a few minor scratches and three deep(er) ones

>>57854569
are you going to change it? the dial and hands look pristine at least. can't see the case too well from that picture.
that's a nice watch design though. is that bracelet actually comfortable?

>>57854463
nice
model of this seiko?

>>57853871
https://www.christopherward.co.uk/watches/limited-editions/c7-bluebird-limited-edition-2

https://www.christopherward.co.uk/watches/limited-editions/c70-ascari-1925-chronometer-limited-edition-2

https://www.christopherward.co.uk/watches/limited-editions/c70-brooklands-1926-chronometer-limited-edition

>>57854454
Whatever normalfag

>>57840563
>very special
>>>and yet it's the most fucking generic rolex ever, and maybe the most common watch of all time
fucking rolexplebs when will they learn

>>57854454
lol

File: IMG_6826.jpg (2MB, 3024x4032px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3024x4032px

>>57854510
Not a shop this is what it actually looks like. Not to everyone's taste but it has presence. Wristlets need not apply

>>57854647
Looks like an 0853-8025

>>57854463
Great buy, a nice historical piece. Looks great

>>57854666
>what kind of sub u want?
>just fuck my shit up

>>57854666
i respect it for what it is, and how it was made. but to me rolex really dropped the ball with all that fucking text on their new watches.
can't argue with devil trips though.

>>57850905
not a fan of the faux vintage dials on these ones

>>57854531
fuck, I think I'll buy it anyway and bulk so it will fit me

>>57854809
you can't really bulk your wrists

>>57854865
it might take a while but it is possible

>>57854895
not really
but good luck on your endeavor friend

>>57854895
The wrist is entirely tendons, the muscles are all in the hand and forearm.

>>57854700
I love the quirkiness of it, it's not trying to appeal the masses like a Sub and it's not to be taken seriously. 99% of people think it's fake because it looks ridiculous but that doesn't bother me at all

>>57854916
>>57854936
I was like getting fat not muscles

>>57854969
you'll need to get really really fat to start storing fat in your wrists desu
i wouldn't do that just to be able to wear a cheapie watch

Is this a quality accutron? I know it doesn't use the original tuning fork but compared to other accutron ii's why is it so cheap?
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00I6CJKQE

>>57855922
accutron ii are quartz, nobody makes tuning fork anymore.
they're all the same quality more or less. the design on this one seems a bit confused, it doesn't know if it wants to be casual or dressy

>>57848967

Pharm bro?

789/rn bro here- I have gotten free shipping on all but 1 watch from Asia and it was $15. The seller is probably charging more because the 787 doesn't appear to be common in the USA.

It may be worth your time to email nzwatches and reddeerwatches and see if they can source one. Red deer had the 789 for 300 when i got it

>>57854310
>>57854666
Now take a pic at a slight angle.

It looks alright from straight on since it's only like 43mm, but the height of it is ridiculous. Over 17mm or something.

File: IMG_20160924_092515.jpg (2MB, 2988x2988px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2988x2988px

>>57851070
Good choice, although I would've got the SARB if you had the cash even though I've had the Citizen for years.

File: IMG_20160829_121915.jpg (129KB, 720x720px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 720x720px

>>57854463
Sexy as fuck. Penis quartz is best quartz.

>>57853095
>Reason
How about self respect?

Or am I too old fashioned?

File: FullSizeRender.jpg (1MB, 3021x2965px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3021x2965px

>>57856073
The caseback sinks in nicely so the watch is actually quite flush. Depends on the wrist and proportions of the wearer

>>57856444
That's fucking invicta tier bro.

>>57856444
T H I C C

>>57850251
You can get a like new condition pre-owned manual (maybe even auto) Junghans Max Bill for 500€ easily. Just look around on ebay.

File: IMG_20161205_225537.jpg (2MB, 2917x2064px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2917x2064px

>>57856169