Microsoft Edge surpasses Mozilla Firefox in web standards compliance

>>57787907
Still not playing webm.

>>57787918
>Microsoft builds a whole web browser from ground up in 3 years
>Mozilla is adding pony pictures and hiring SJWs
N-NANI?!

>>57787957
Still better than any webkit based browser.

>edge has more botnet than firefox
What's there to brag about?

File: screenshot-html5test.com-2016-12-01-11-44-41.png (5KB, 209x127px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 209x127px

Whoa. I'm running Chrome 54 (current stable) and Edge is only 14 points away.

>>57787918
It's coming.

Edge surpassed it because they forced it onto every Windows 10 user. Whether or not you are using a different browser, it'll probably still saying you are using "Edge." They did the same thing with Internet Explorer.

>>57788215
This isn't about usage, this is about web standard compliance.

>compliance
DO NOT COMPLY

SHALL NOT

File: 1474997926073.jpg (190KB, 640x800px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 640x800px

>>57787957
>>Microsoft builds a whole web browser from ground up in 3 years
Edge is based on E11.

>>57787907
>pssh, nothing personal kid

File: Screenshot_20161130-120116.png (465KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

465KB, 1080x1920px

I don't care
Firefox is still non-botnet
The others are botnet
Edge, Chrome, Opera
I'll take a small hit on smoothness, responsiveness and loading speed on exchange for the guarantee of browser privacy

Firefox is the only redpilled browser

>>57787907
>compared to firefox
Not really trying to jump a high bar there, are they? Firefox can barely play fucking flash.

haha great shit

w3c standards went corporate dogshit

if taking computation control away from user is standard, then im glad to use any of a halfdozen low-compliant firefox forks

mozilla isnt worthy of praise either, the morons cant decide if they want to follow the original motto "take back the web" or "take back the user share" by tryting to catch up with interface fads and silly shit

>>57789198
>Firefox is still non-botnet
about:networking

>tfw using SeaMonkey and despise the lack of add-ons but normal Firefox is a botnet and palemoon is cancer.

>>57789161
>Edge is based on E11.
>this is what freetards actually believe

>>57787907
>Firefox is a piece of shit

what else is new

>>57787907
>web standards
>html5test

>>57789251
t. chromshit user

>>57789229
>e the lack of add-ons
really? i just read on wikipedia that its fairly compatible and addons can be "easyly made compatible?

are you surte you junt dont need to grab the versions of extensions prior to firefox 48 or some other mark when they they changed something major?

>palemoon is cancer.
elaborate?

>>57789277
t. assmad firefox user

>>57789244
Sharing is caring. Especially in the compatibility of the exploits, but go on.

>>57787907
Who cares, it's still a shit browser

>>57789251
>>57789277
>>57789287
Hold on now, let's put this shit to bed. I'm a FF user and have been since it was created. I'm hyper-autismo control freak. But the newer iterations of firefox are pure catshit with zero functionality. The devs have a hate hard-on for shit like flash and decided to add retarded bullshit like the plugin container that makes the god damned browser crash about 40 times a day. The devs of FF are absolutely insufferable cunts who think a browser isn't supposed to be for internet surfing for some reason and never admit when they've fucked up. They live in their own evil, retarded bubble and deserve public executions.

>>57789287
Fuck off.

>>57789340
Fuck off you too.

>>57789340
didn't read

File: 23324.png (216KB, 1085x1085px) Image search: [Google]

216KB, 1085x1085px

furcucks BTFO once again!

>>57787957
I hate to admit it, but while i was strongly in favor of firing that old CEO, that's what tipped mozilla over and was basically the beginning of the end.
I still use FF because i can't live without some of my addons but god damn.

File: Capture.png (6KB, 365x175px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 365x175px

>>57787918
>Still not playing webm

It plays webm fine, they just didn't bother with deprecated shit like vp8 that only Luddite sites like 4chan use.

>>57788215
t. lincuck

>>57789283
They lied. 95% of extensions don't work on SeaMonkey or palememe.

>>57789198
>uses non-botnet web browser
>on android

Top lel

Daily reminder that if you are using any nonfree software on your computer you have been cucked - perhaps without realizing it

>>57789340
Maybe ff isn't maintainable in current form. I use nightly but the rendering and the html5 video is a mess. Bugs reported by several users, so they know about it. The codec bug merged with the stable as 50 now barely can play HD videos. Maybe i'm wrong but i think it must be the new rust backend.

>>57789405
>that's what tipped mozilla over and was basically the beginning of the end.

Brave is bigger shit with its own ads and i doubt it's legal.

>>57789423
>deprecated shit like vp8 that only Luddite sites like

Youtube. That was pathetic damage controll from (You).

>>57789474
Infidel. :^) Phishing protection can be considered as botnet on /g/

>>57789474
At least Firefox itself is not botnet.

I will wean myself off Android and Windows. It takes time.

File: Capture.png (3KB, 313x159px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 313x159px

>>57789423

>>57789529
Did they just patch Firefox and Tor today because zeroday javascript attack?

>>57789528
>html5
html5 is a needy cunt and so is anyone who defends it. Death to status quo zombies!

>>57787907
Call me when it has WebRTC, Service Workers and full Web Components support including HTML Imports.

File: Untitled.png (82KB, 931x894px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 931x894px

>>57789564
yep, just updated.

Is there any way to block YouTube ads on Edge? It's the only reason I don't use it.

File: Screenshot (38).jpg (280KB, 1200x932px) Image search: [Google]

280KB, 1200x932px

>>57789528
>Youtube
VP9, works for me.

>>57789534
Works on my machine, cuck.

>>57789638
VP8 too.

>>57789665
Literally nobody cares about vp8 webm any more, its deprecated for years now.

Edge supports webm contrary to what >>57787918 as well as all the FUD spreaders are claiming. VP9 webm is fully supported.

Fun fact, also fully supported by Edge is encrypted hls/https/m3u8 h264 streams which firefox and chrome both refuse to pay to use which means only Edge and Safari can make use of it.

>>57789629
ublock

File: waifu.png (211KB, 509x410px) Image search: [Google]

211KB, 509x410px

>>57789707

>>57789726
Oh, thank you, anon.

>>57789749
Are you severely mentally ill?
The whole conversation has been:
>edge cant play webm
>yes it can

Nothing you have replied to me with >>57789528
>>57789665
>>57789749
Have ANYTHING to do with fucking anything.
Google made vp9 because vp8 has problems, they have been using VP9 for years now preferred and Edge also supports VP9 webm.

You are so stupid it's actually pissing me off. I'm done, have fun spreading lies about Edge not supporting webm and clinging to vp8 years after Google deprecated it you fucking moron.

Yes I mad.
i have not come across someone as stupid and oblivious to reality on this site as you are in a long time.

>>57789800
Memory of goldfish.
See >>57789423
>deprecated shit like vp8 that only Luddite sites like 4chan use.

>Yes I mad.
But since you use W10 i forgive you as i'm not your medic.

>>57789800
>he cant play webms on 4chinz
lel, I would be mad too.

Do i still have to reactivate all my addons everytime i open it because that's why i stopped using it.

File: Firefox-logo.svg.png (298KB, 500x605px) Image search: [Google]

298KB, 500x605px

J U S T

>>57789859
You should seriously consider killing yourself.
VP8 is only used by youtube for 640x360 videos because of old smartphones and pajeets.

Every other youtube video format uses VP9.

I don't even understand who you are lying/shilling for in this case because you're wrong about MS, wrong about google... nobody else matters in this so I guess you are just infuriatingly retarded.

File: a02.jpg (41KB, 625x626px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 625x626px

>>57790008
Easy to trigger the faggots like you. Much fun.
>wall of bullshit
:^)

Why these fucking webm isn't working? I'm mad.

>>57790047
>haha I was just pretending to be retarded hahaha

Congratulations on being cancer.

Why won't /g/ ever admit that Chrome is simply superior in terms of performance?

>>57790202
botnet

>>57790202
>Chrome is simply superior in terms of performance
its not

I'm sure I'm not the only one who stopped using FF when the company chose to dispose her co-founder just because he chose to exert his constitutional right. There is no excuse for that.

So, which browser is /g/ approved? Firecuck forks don't need to apply.

>>57790398
Palemoon.

>>57790398
Chromium.

>>57790398
They're all fucking bad just roll a dice and start shilling

>>57789244
>EdgeHTML is a proprietary layout engine developed by Microsoft for the Microsoft Edge web browser. It is a fork of Trident

intothetrash.png

>>57790304
You do know there are plenty of forks?

>>57790455
>that has removed all legacy code
>and rewritten the majority of its source code

>>57790398
Opera.

>>57790488
The ones riddled with serious security issues? Might as well use Chrome then.

>>57790508
>>that has removed all legacy code
Who knows. IE is proprietary.

>>57788215
Forcing Edge on Windows 10 is actually the reason why it does not get any usage share at all.

>>57790559
Opera is literal chinese botnet calling home every 5 minutes

The Windows Filtering Platform has blocked a connection.

Application Information:
    Process ID:        155552
    Application Name:    \device\harddiskvolume2\users\user\appdata\local\programs\opera developer\43.0.2423.0\opera.exe

Network Information:
    Direction:        Outbound
    Source Address:        192.168.1.100
    Source Port:        62638
    Destination Address:    239.255.255.250
    Destination Port:        1900
    Protocol:        17

The Windows Filtering Platform has blocked a connection.

Application Information:
    Process ID:        155552
    Application Name:    \device\harddiskvolume2\users\user\appdata\local\programs\opera developer\43.0.2423.0\opera.exe

Network Information:
    Direction:        Outbound
    Source Address:        192.168.1.100
    Source Port:        5353
    Destination Address:    224.0.0.251
    Destination Port:        5353
    Protocol:        17

>>57789244
>>this is what freetards actually believe

He is right though. They wanted to remove the legacy compatibility crap from IE, so they forked it and called it Spartan (later Edge).

>>57790757
Then Vivaldi, you cuck.

>>57790790
>Vivaldi
botnet

>>57790800
Then Brave.

>>57790790
>swap one botnet to another
Think I'm gonna pass, you cuck

File: snip.png (39KB, 1312x529px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 1312x529px

What went wrong?

>>57790785
[citation needed]

>>57789143
BE

>>57789507
says he while posting from a nonfree internet access point

>>57790897
Mozilla started kicking out straight white men and replacing them with women, niggers and queers.

Fast forward a few years and firefox is like big cities in the western "first world" where society has turned to shit by stupidity and degeneracy.

Vivaldi is not a botnet.

>>57787907
Firefox has always been a shitty browser. Back in the days when it was gaining loads of traction, it was better than IE6 and that was it. Its standards compliance was shit, their record on patching security holes wasn't great, they didn't innovate in terms of features at all. Opera was better in every conceivable way, cucked by it originally being shareware and later having adverts. Moreover, because the web was built for standards-disregarding IE6, a lot of web pages didn't support Opera well, so Firefox being behind the curve did it a massive favour.

After numerous years they improved, but Chrome came along and did a better job of compliance and pushed its webkit engine everywhere. Now loads of browsers use it and don't need to worry about keeping their rendering engines up to date, unlike poor mozilla playing catchup with their gecko.

>>57790559
No, Opera fucked themselves ages ago. It's a joke now.

So which mobile browser is the least cancerous now?

>>57792423
Brave.

File: 1433932375232.jpg (37KB, 580x346px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 580x346px

It doesn't matter if it's better at complying with web standards because:

1) It's proprietary and that alone is enough for me to never use it, but assuming I would
2) Microshit is without a shadow of a doubt going to embrace, extend and extinguish whenever it's profitable for them

That being said that doesn't absolve the firefox dev team from slacking off and focusing on pointless shit instead

>>57792574
Doesn't it include some micropayments?

File: daily reminder.png (69KB, 580x580px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 580x580px

>>57787907
Requires botnet OS.

>>57787907
Lynx is the only browser you should be using.

>>57791483
Such conviction. The botnet is built into WebKit itself noob

File: h351.jpg (44KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 640x480px

>19 for input fields

>>57789227
It's only connected to mozzila and a certificate site and nothing else, what's the problem?

>>57794335
Bing.

>>57791483
Vivaldi is Vivaldi.

On IceCat i can't post in random ImageBoards because "invalid HTTP", i try disable my addons but this shit happens, what i need make?

File: logo_chromium.png (57KB, 533x537px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 533x537px

The undisputed champion.

>>57789340
Kill yourself faggot

File: Screenshot from 2016-12-01 22-06-29.png (40KB, 822x464px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 822x464px

>>57787907

chrome surpasses both

>>57789198

i've said the most edgy insane shit using chromium, and no feds to be found. i don't really care if the feds are spying on me as long as they don't lock me up for non-crimes such as wanking off and saying edgy shit

File: cover.jpg (824KB, 1254x1254px) Image search: [Google]

824KB, 1254x1254px

>>57787907
Based Microsoft is based. Despite what the autistic Sparta on /g/ might say, Edge is a pretty good browser, better than firefox and arguably better than chrome, it's time you faggots abandon your edgy bullshit for once and try it out, Edge particularly works best with Windows 10, they go GREAT together.

File: blnt.png (25KB, 1010x362px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 1010x362px

>>57787907

Better luck next time to both of them.

>>57797337
>he's got an open source browser
>there's no botnet
>it's so fast

creamed myself

>>57790304
lol fuck those stupid faggots. they need to let him have his own political views and not try to get him fired for 'equality.' thankfully due to a thing called capitalism, it isn't profitable to fire everyone besides mentally ill faggots and their followers. bye bye mozilla

when will the faggots cry begging for communism so things like this won't happen?

>>57789198
Plus, when you listen to Youtube on Firefox Android, the music keeps playing when you close your phone or use another app. I find this feature extremely useful when I want to have music while doing other stuff. I think the reason that the YouTube app doesn't have this is that it's a feature of "YouTube RED" which requires a monthly payment.

>>57797337
literally what the fuck is wrong with ungoogled chromium? it's the best one

>>57791277
That's fucking stupid, please show me the alternate universe run by straight white men where everything is perfect for you

>>57798756
This is b8 but you're still a mentally ill NEET crossdresser.

>>57787907
oh yeah, i'm sure it supports webrtc, beacons, geolocation and all those other nice tracking features.

meanwhile, still no opus, no custom elements. not even subresource integrity. topkek.

>>57798756
So much this!

Mozilla's downfall has absolutely nothing to do with replacing white men with women and lgbqt minorities, nothing at all. Just a coincidence if you ask me.

>>57797337
>manually checking for updates

>>57796144
Remove it from default search engines. I only leave Google, ddg and Wikipedia.

Amazon is currently developing a browser. I'm sorry that I can't offer proof but it's to risky.

File: HTML5test - How well does your browser support HTML5 - Mozilla Firefox (Private Browsing).png (156KB, 1627x1382px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 1627x1382px

>>57787907
>implying all html5 standards should be supported
Enjoy your botnet DRM.

Is there anyway I can make Brave's rendering look better? The shit looks hazy to me compared to other browsers.

File: Google Chome test.png (180KB, 1440x900px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 1440x900px

I prefer Chrome

What about BRAVE?

>>57798502

what browser are you using?

Vivaldi?

>>57803481
So brave.

>>57789564
I was expecting a /g/ thread about it

>>57789564
If you weren't running ff50 it could access windows kernel. ff50 had sandboxing so it could only access some parts of the filesystem.

>>57798756
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Man_in_the_High_Castle_(TV_series)

>>57807139
>a fascist world

Why would you want to give up all of your freedom to live under fascism?

>>57788215
You are an illiterate fucktard. This is about web standard compliance, not number of users.

>>57803481
Paid ads.

>>57801445
>Google
>botnet free

ebin

>>57808902
>not connected to Google at all unless you search on Google
Yes, it's botnet free.

>>57789405
>addons

They will remove those soon, just you wait.

>>57810790
They're removing them because they're getting in the way of developing the browser. Probably part of the reason IE 2.0 is now more compliant in some ways than firefox.

>>57789229
I just use waterfox now because tab addiction and needed more ram per process than still shit 32bit.

488 features on dumb ass test I don't care about.

Loses features on not supporting DRM or other garbage I don't want anyway.

>>57798713
>>57798516
>>57797337
I heard there was a backdoor in chromium that let google botnet you
That true?

>>57812042
>>57801998
The test doesn't award points for supporting EME.

>>57812093
>no source cited

I heard the moon was made out of cheese.

File: 1463352557090.png (429KB, 399x614px) Image search: [Google]

429KB, 399x614px

>>57790047
>>57790008
>>57789859
>>57789800
>57789800
>>57789749
>>57789707
>>57789665
>>57789638
>>57789528
>>57789405
>>57787957
>>57787918

What does 'botnet' mean at this point?

>>57798502
Fake and gay.

Your score doesn't appear anywhere in their stats.

>>57787907
I got 473 with all flags enabled and 460 with default settings on Microsoft Edge 14 on Windows 10.

I got 499 on Google Chrome 54.0.2840.99 m (64-bit) on Windows 10.

Microsoft Edge is actually pretty nice. The design makes it look a little dated and unprofessional. If they designed it like their Office suite then it would have more potential, I believe. It certainly has potential and it's nothing to laugh at. Certainly not the joke that Internet Explorer still is, but I see no point in switching from Google Chrome. What I will say though is that it does have the best chance of me switching to it in the future.

I'll either use Google Chrome forever. Or if anything happens I'll switch to Microsoft Edge. Absolutely not using Internet Explorer and there's no chance in hell I'm giving Mozilla Firefox another chance. It's like the 20th chance I've given to it and it ALWAYS disappoints me. On top of it just being bad in general (member when it was king back in the day? I member) it has poor design decisions. I remember trying it again a while ago and their great feature was a built in messenger. Oh wow... Real good job... I forgot what they've recently done... Firefox Sync? Yeah... pffft.

It is great on mobile though because of extension support, meaning you have adblocker, but it's bulky and crashes even on an S7. AdBlock Browser seems to be better and you can just use Chrome for Mobile for normie things. Or just use a VPN or edit host so... Not really much of a competition.

>>57787907
>>57787957
Allah, Microsoft is a multi-billion dollar company and around for decades, it's embarrassing that they finally caught up.

>>57798829
Hilarious that that's all you can come back with

>>57800026
Mozilla downfall or M$/Googles rise? Both of which are hire more than just straight white men.

You'd have more luck tying Mozilla downfall to the success of women and lgbtqs in MS and Google

>>57808902
but it is anon's choice to select google botnet instead of bing botnet.. the thing is that you can choose non-botnet search if you want and there wont be telemetry showed down your throat

File: fuckoff.jpg (136KB, 542x700px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 542x700px

>>57787957
"sjw" is a meaningless buzzword used by alt-righters and neckbeards to refer to anyone left of Hitler. And it's double off topic because your snarl word isn't relevant to coding to begin with.

>>57816197
0/10

>>57815308
>>57800026
>buttblasted racist neckbeard who feels threatened by the prospect girls and minorities writing code
Firefox is best browser available right now. I bet that triggers you more than anything else.

>>57798660
Mozilla isn't going anywhere and Firefox is doing fine. And that bigot they fired wasn't even doing any coding at the time, so cry me a river and then shut the fuck up.

File: Screenshot_20161203_011406.png (17KB, 906x191px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 906x191px

>>57787907

>>57816211
Yes, your post is.

>>57808995
What is phishing "protection" aka censorship.

>>57816219
>Firefox is best browser available right now.

Thank you for your valuable input, Pajeeta.

>>57816784
It's the only one that's not a botnet. Delusional alt-right neckbeards who have some sort of political agenda against Mozilla can cry their eyes out for all I care, but there's no doubt Firefox is the only decent browser left that isn't a botnet.

>>57812042
>I just use waterfox now because tab addiction and needed more ram per process than still shit 32bit.
Firefox has stable 64 bit Windows builds since last year or so

Why can't internet be just text with hyperlinks?
If you want user interactions make a fucking native app.

>>57817492
Learn what the internet is first.

>>57817492
http://motherfuckingwebsite.com/
http://bettermotherfuckingwebsite.com/

>>57817492
>>57818549

what is basic css... what is the difference between you adding css rules and your browser doing it?

>>57787918
/thread

>>57789442
Name 5.

I use SeaMonkey and all the popular FF extensions are available for it

>>57790757
Probably checking for updates, you colossal faggot.

>le every time a program calls home it means botnet meme

File: html5.png (11KB, 817x177px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 817x177px

>>57787907
i dont need those tracking "features"

File: NO_0.png (104KB, 703x614px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 703x614px

WHERE IS MY FUCKING .APNG SUPPORT

WHAT BROWSER HAS DEVS THAT UNDERSTAND YOU MUST SUPPORT EVERYTHING, NO MATTER HOW REDUNDANT

>>57818549
That guy who made better... has no idea about CSS. The actual source code of that site is so bad, you don't even know.
https://bestmotherfucking.website/

>>57819651
Isn't APNG dead?