What went wrong with 3DTV? Will they ever make a comeback?

>>57781325
for enthusiasts they're relevant for this present day.

OLED 3D looks as good as never before

>>57781325
It's a stupid meme that always looked like garbage. Plus the glasses made you look like a fucking tool

stereoscopic is objectively superior to monoscopic but an hmd and virtual cinema software might be the better way to go.

>>57781433
the problem though is that's it is completely unsociable

>>57781447
how is that a problem?

File: ss (2016-12-01 at 06.38.41).jpg (246KB, 1060x1001px) Image search: [Google]

246KB, 1060x1001px

>>57781457
non at all. noone visits me for watching a movie anyway :)

File: 1445728033678.jpg (576KB, 3072x2304px) Image search: [Google]

576KB, 3072x2304px

>>57781325
Barrier of entry for cost of content creation (even post is pricey) and bad timing with the saturation of flat panels. No one will replace a working TV just because it isn't 3D.

>>57781447
>Unsociable
Good, I don't want motherfuckers talking during my movies going "WOW" or "OMG I THOUGHT IT WAS GONNA HIT ME XDDDDDDDDDDDDD".

>>57781482
>Rift with the leap motion affixed to it

Are you me?

3D will only become commonplace once they figure out how to do wide angle autostereoscopy

File: rift.jpg (42KB, 706x941px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 706x941px

>>57781525

>>57781421
>It's a stupid meme
You mean HDR, right?

>>57781613
maybe, testing out hi fidelity .io out now

>>57781421
>In your own home
>Caring about looking like a tool to yourself

You need mental help bad