U JELLY?

>>57772236
Is this skylake?

more benchmarks you neiger

>>57772259
Don't post any more images without putting it next to the i7 6700k.

Ideally I want to see it next to the i7 6700k, the i5 7600k, and the i5 6600k

>>57772259
You should rerun that after a fresh reboot since I already get that with a 4.6GHz 6700k

Same socket as 6000 series, right? So it should be a smooth upgrade.

>>57772230
>consumershit
no

>>57772259
AMD is finished!!!! LOL!

>>57772349
>poorshit

kek

File: you_asked_for_this.jpg (51KB, 600x515px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 600x515px

>>57772357
>Yup

>>57772359
>he doesn't have Xeons
Who's poor? You?

>>57772370
DELET THIS

>>57772370
>a 10% increase is nothing

spoiled kids

>>57772378
For what fucking purpose?
At least with consumershit, you can gayme.

>1% better IPC than Skylake

LOL

Should've gotten 6700k instead, it's just flat-out superior if you're going to overclock anyway.

File: wojak_618x740.jpg (65KB, 618x740px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 618x740px

>>57772370
DELET

>>57772370
DELET

>>57772406
For the purpose of not being a poor faggot. You can game just fine, the Xeon branding doesn't disable games. I'm not a child, though.

>>57772404
it is 1% increase, not 10% you math illiterate

>>57772230
1.23v for 4.5 is somewhat impressive

>>57772420
Not even that. The IPC is identical, Kaby Lake is just Skylake with slightly improved process node(in theory) and higher clocks.

reminder that jealous refers to a fear of losing something and envy is wanting what others have

so what you should've said is "U ENVIOUS?"

>>57772406

To do important adult mature stuff, like encoding little girl chinese cartoons

>>57772420
>implying you can get much higher
It's not like the jump from single cycle to pipelining.

>>57772404
>don't know how to read two numbers
>calling other people kids

>>57772406
>At least with consumershit, you can gayme.
>>>/v/

File: reeepepe.jpg (80KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 500x500px

>>57772370

>4.20GHZ

DUDE

>>57772461
do you rip the cartoons as well? I don't see the point in encoding otherwise, others already did it for you

File: L_Intersil-IM6100AIPL[1].jpg (22KB, 561x284px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 561x284px

U JELLY?

>>57772370
DELETE

>>57772230
cum on it.

post results with timestamp.

>>57772230
Why does bus speed drop when running at 4.5 GHz?

I recently bought a 6850k, so not really

File: 14649907552690.jpg (41KB, 429x377px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 429x377px

>>57772259
Lul still clocks lower than my old 3930k, who /nopointinupgrading/ here?

>>57772455
if everyone defines the word the other way, that is what the word means

>>57772449
>tfw my 6700k needs 1.4v for 4.5GHZ

Feel with me /g/

;_;

>>57772370
MODS

>>57772494
350<600

File: 1426680746285.gif (2MB, 240x192px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 240x192px

>>57772230
Why the hell would I be jelly when I own a 2500K™?

>>57772463

Are you trying to tell me that we have the reach a plateau on IPC?

>>57772514
my 2500k needs [email protected] Ghz, stop crying kiddo

>>57772230
>U JELLY?

i5-6400 @4.5 Ghz ... Nope not jealous

>>57772252
Looks like crappy lake

>>57772252
Kaby Lake, can't you read?

Graphene CPUs when?

Is clear that silicon reached it's limits already

>>57772536
I would expect double performance for half the price in 5 years boi or at least same performance for a quarter the original price

>>57772554
Intel sure has. But then again, that's what happens when you focus almost all of your resources on optimizing a single architecture and don't try anything new.

File: p1.jpg (542KB, 1000x998px) Image search: [Google]

542KB, 1000x998px

does it have MMX Technology?

>>57772609
I'm reading the specs not the ad

>>57772230
isnt the cpu where they put worse thermal paste on it than the ivy bridge ones?

>>57772798
False

Intel uses good thermal paste

>>57772252
the lake dried up
there is no lake

>>57772768
Yes, plus:
SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE4, SSE4.2, AES, AVX and a shitload more useless crap.
Doesn't have based AltiVec though, so dropped.

>>57772259
>1280x720
why

>>57772455
Language changed you dumbfuck. If somehow enough people use the word "ur mom" to replace "whore", then ur mom is a whore.

>>57772406
>At least with consumershit, you can gayme.
Are you implying you can't play with Xeon's?
kek

>>57772822
Why the hate for new instruction sets?

>>57772455
Also bitch is a female dog.

You're a female dog.

>>57773040
Because RISC and optimized code is all you need. But pajeets can't into optimization.

>>57772768
I've got one of them somewhere but nothing to use it in.

File: laugh.gif (262KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

262KB, 300x300px

>4/8 Cores/Threads
>8MB Cache

Meanwhile you could get like, a Xeon 5650 and overclock it to 4.5GHz easy, and still get a better result for a ton of less money.
nice fucking technical advancements lol

>>57773002
It's a good implication, many older xeons just do not have the single thread power for newer games
And the point of buying a Xeon is buying an old xeon

>>57772370
REEEEEEEEEEE

>>57772822
Does it have VT-d?

>>57773087
Im not convinced ISA is more important than microarchitecture.

>>57773155
>And the point of buying a Xeon is buying an old xeon
Eh, you can get a new 4 core/8 thread xeon for about the price of an unlocked i5. That's not an unattractive option even if it'll be clocked somewhat lower.

File: high quality pupper.jpg (293KB, 800x757px) Image search: [Google]

293KB, 800x757px

>>57773155
But the modern gaming craze has been all about multicore, anything that requires a modern GPU easily at least somewhat supports multicore these days, so in fact a Xeon is no doubt better than an i7 or i5 when it comes to getting ready for "future gaming"

although maybe I'm just biased considering I got my dual E5-2670's for 40 bux

2500K here, when will it actually be time to buy a new processor?

>>57773189
When the microarchitecture is literally a Pentium Pro, rehashed and higer clocked every single year ad ifnfinitum, it is.
>>57773187
Knowing Intel, it probably won't.

>>57773213
The "craze" lately is realistically been limited to 2 cores and hyperthreading. Maybe DX12 can bring the upper limit to 6 cores with hyperthreading, but that's still up to the devs, who I personally have no faith in.
But like I said, xeons are good for being cheap and powerful multicore CPUs, but Intel won't ever let xeons pass their core line in IPC (which is specifically made for the best IPC). if DX12 gets big, CPU priorities are gonna start moving towards multicore quick, let's hope game developers can get off their ass

>>57773290
I don't know why I said "if", DX12 will get big because it's OBJECTIVELY way way better than DX11
Like DX12 or not, compared to dx11 it's revolutionary

>>57773283
There was a study I read that disagreed with you, so I'm just going to trust them instead of some random racist anon.

>>57773142
No one wants a used throwaway housefire chip that was $1k new with an expensive mobo.

>>57773268

When they invent a new alternative to silicon.
CPU improvements have stagnated like a motherfucker.

>>57773370
Even then, the newest non-silicon CPU probably won't be as good as the last silicon CPU for a while

http://www.pcgamesn.com/intel/kaby-lake-release-date

>Intel are only introducing two new motherboard platforms for the 7th generation chips. At the top end will be the Z270 chipset, replacing Skylake’s existing Z170 chipset,

>Z270 chipset, replacing Skylake’s existing Z170 chipset,

What the fuck?

How many people have just upgraded/bought new builds filled with countless Z170 MBs? This is absolutely insane.

>>57772680

To be fair, why would they? They had something that just werks, and AMD did not have anything comparable. They saw what can happen when you experiment and try to be cutting edge (Bulldozer) and decided to keep a good thing going.

It's hard to justify billions and billions of R&D for something that might not produce an ROI. The fact that Intel can release a product that's 1-5% better than than last year's while being 10%+ more expensive and still sell it just shows you how shit the market is.

I really hope Zen is even 80% close to Intel shit. It would at least lower prices. If Zen by some miracle actually turns out good I hope Intel fucking loses the generation. They need a fucking wake up call cause 1% improvement is not going to cut it.

>4.20 GHz
fucking druggie

>>57773417
Kaby lake is still 1151 socket and compatible with skylake motherboards. Intel just likes to release new chipsets along with new CPUs.

>>57773333
Link? I'd like to see it, maybe I'm wrong.

>>57773417
Literally the only difference between Z170 and Z270 is optane support, and optane doesn't exist yet and was delayed AGAIN.
You don't need a new motherboard at all

>>57772230
I'm mostly water actually.

>>57773403

Could be, though they've been making pretty good improvements in the photonic CPU field already.
Silicon + photonic mix will most likely be the next big thing.
Seems like the best solution at the moment is to get something with 6 cores and just wait 6-8 years till a whole new alternative to the current tech comes out.

>>57773441
http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2699682

I think there's a paywall, so cough up $15

>>57773087
Imagine how fast everything would be if there were no Pajeets. I'm picturing a world where everything you do on the computer is instantaneous. Booting; launching applications; loading web pages; everything.

>>57772560
Are you me? I can't even get my 2500k past 4.1ghz

>>57773155
>And the point of buying a Xeon is buying an old xeon
lol back to being poor.

>>57773363
whatever makes you feel better about your shit chip

>>57772420
Its basically what devils canyon was to haswell.

File: 1477937229916.png (814KB, 604x717px) Image search: [Google]

814KB, 604x717px

>>57772370
HEHEHHEHHEE

>>57774015
Devils canyon was less than a refresh/new generation and more a attempt to jew overclockers with promise of better TIM

>>57772370
>at this point Intel doesn't even try anymore because ayymd is so shit it can't even compete

>>57772834
scaled down you dumb fuck

>>57773142
I'd buy one if the corresponding board wasn't $400. You can get a 6800K with its LGA2011-v3 board for $520

>>57775236
Where are 1366 boards 400 dollars and where can I get a decent 2011 board for under 300?

File: My_eBay Purchase_History_-_Firefox_Developer_Editi_2016-12-01_00-27-01.png (44KB, 978x294px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 978x294px

>>57775236
>corresponding board wasn't $400.
living the true hero life here

could also get em from china for less than 80 dollars.

>>57772230
>7th gen

why would i be jealous of someone cucking themselves for overpriced shit? get a 2nd gen.

>>57772370
>b-but the power consumption!!

File: CINEBENCH Windows 64 Bit_2016-11-30_16-48-37.png (922KB, 1207x697px) Image search: [Google]

922KB, 1207x697px

>>57772230
>>57772236
>>57772259
Nah, not really.

File: 55219_04_7700k-barely-faster-6700k-uses-much-more-power.png (274KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

274KB, 600x450px

>>57772230
>>57772230
>>57772230
http://www.tweaktown.com/news/55219/7700k-vs-6700k-much-hotter-barely-faster/index.html
INTEL FINISHED AND BANKRUPT

File: 55219_03_7700k-barely-faster-6700k-uses-much-more-power.png (144KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 600x450px

>>57775817

>>57772230
No, but I might be in the future when it's needed.

>>57772230
Like my 6700K yours is barely faster and MUCH hotter.

>>57774015
Devils Canyon was just a Haswell refresh.

File: intelmobossuck.png (593KB, 1423x595px) Image search: [Google]

593KB, 1423x595px

>>57775404
Fuck that shipping.. For that price might as well move up to sandy bridge and not use that piece of shit motherboard. Doesn`t even have sata 3.

>>57775833
>this increase in temps
>for almost non-existent speed increase
BLUNDER

File: Screenshot 2016-11-30 18.08.12.png (17KB, 407x404px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 407x404px

>>57772230
nah m8

>>57776092
Lol gimped ES. What a retard, everyone point and laugh.

>>57776092
Did you buy it new or second hand from ebay?

>>57776139
>Did you buy it new
It's an ES, he paid for stolen goods lmao.

>>57776092
>2.8
It isnt 2005 anymore

File: 1478237909485.jpg (42KB, 344x344px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 344x344px

>>57776110
>gimped

Its 100 mhz lower than the final revision and that was easily compensated for by bumping the bus speed up a couple mhz.

>>57776139
used and cheap AF

>>57776224
Except the real 2670 will turbo to 3.1GHz and yours doesn't. Regardless you still don't own it. And you spent like 1200 bucks on it, lol.

>>57776206
it's a Xeon E5-2670 v3 m8

File: 1456941036579.jpg (54KB, 614x572px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 614x572px

>>57776237
Single core turbo is irrelevant for what i bought it for. Also i got it for $300 almost 2 years ago from China.

>>57776290
Sure you did, buddy. Enjoy your unowned processors and broken feature implementations while the real smart people buy retail chips.

File: 1726450i03g9jmahjj0mjj.png (63KB, 421x248px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 421x248px

>>57776317
>smart people burn money

k m8
I will continue to enjoy editing on my $300 CPU that performs like a $1,670 retail CPU.

>>57776406
Yes, continue to commit literal crimes because of your poverty just to make iPhone movies in your sandbox.

>>57776024
Kaby Lake is just a Skylake refresh. Intel claimed process improvements and better overclocking for Devil's Canyon too. It was bullshit then and it's bullshit now. They've just gone the extra mile this time by changing the architecture name too, so that dumb goyim will """""upgrade""""" their Skylake chip to something with identical performance.

>>57776436
>GUYS I MAKE MONEY I MAKE MONEY GUYS UR ALL POOR I DO THE MOST EXPENSIVE THING CUZ I HAVE MONEY UNLIKE U POORFAGS LOLOLOL!!!!!
conspicuous consumption and poverty.jpg

>>57772230
Nah my i7 2600k is just fine.

>>57776436

>being this jealous

>>57776528
When did I say anything about me? Stop projecting. There's no reason to steal, there are plenty of things that will do what you want that you can actually afford.

You know what this tells me?

Think bout it for a sec. If anyone other then Ayymd knows what REAL performance Zen has, it's Intel. Don't bullshit yourself they don't.

And what Intel is doing?

4 threaded Pentiums
K-version of i3 (7350k)
i5 and i7 is 1% increase (lel)

So after analyzing zen performance, they felt it's needed to quite significantly change Pentium and i3 line, but they can do crapall for i5 and i7.

Which makes me believe zen is gonna be better than a skylake i3, but worse than an i5. Just hope they won't go full retard with the price here in eastern europe like Amd always does.

>>57772230
How many allowances did that cost you?

>>57776671
>How many allowances did that cost you?
370 goodboy points

>>57772340
If you mean »getting 0-15% more performance for paying a shitton amount of money« by upgrade, then yes, it should be a smooth update.

Kaby Lake makes sense for notebooks, it's fucking nothing for desktops though. But hey, at least you will get 4k Gilmore Girls from Netflix

>>57776593
You realise that these chips were taped out a long time ago, right? We already know that Intel is bringing hexa-cores to the mainstream platform in 2018. They wouldn't be bothering to do that if they didn't feel there was any competition.

>>57772296
You can run cinebench yourself you know. The i7 6700k gets about 800 pts on stock clocks. At 5GHz it'd be in the same ballpark.

>>57776206
I have a 2.3GHz Xeon and it's more than adequate in "IT'S THE CURRENT YEAR!".

>>57772809
thats why at same clock speed between a 6700k and 7700k, the 7700k shits out damn near double the heat?

>>57777304
Less leaky node, can reach same clocks at less voltage but will get shit hot at high clocks

>>57772259
>1029
>still not as good as 2x Xeon x5650 from 2010 that you can buy off of ebay for 80 bucks

>>57772668
But you have that available you massive faggot.

File: 1480093119994.png (23KB, 212x172px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 212x172px

>>57772230
1% more IPC ON THE SAME CLOCK SPEED.

INOVATION GENTS

File: Untitled-1.jpg (193KB, 403x402px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 403x402px

>>57772560
>>57773575
I'm at 4.5 with 1.37v.... I must have a good chip.

>>57776027
who could possibly be stupid enough to buy a 6-core 2011 xeon for $90 today?

>>57772230
>5 percent increase in performance
> i have a 6950x
>implying i care

>>57776027
>single CPU LGA 2011 mobo
why is /g/ so dumb

>>57775817
>>57775833
Get 10% more performance for 20% more power???
Why

>>57772230
no I am not you faggot

>>57772370

What does this mean? It's so absurd I can't actually believe that they intentionally made a new chip that is almost identical to their last one.

Someone bitch slap me, tell me in simple what the fuck does this mean. I think I'm having a panic attack.

I'm so glad I bought a 6600k and didn't buy into the 'wait' meme.

>>57777368
>Enjoying your 600niggawatt heater in the winter

>>57778410
>600watt for two x5650's
u wot

also who the fuck buys two x5650's lmao, they're only good if you overclock em

File: fuck.gif (3MB, 370x196px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 370x196px

>didn't upgrade i3 6100 for 6600k on sale for blackfriday because surely intel will do better with kaby lake

>>57777884
No that's pretty bad

>>57778102
>dual socket
>E5-1650
Ok boss.

File: 1474733686631.jpg (116KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 960x960px

>>57772370

File: hmm.png (99KB, 601x247px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 601x247px

>>57777972
As opposed to..?

>>57778102
There are some good deals to be had on dual socket boards right now, didn`t bother looking because they`re normally 300$+ And you`re looking at 100$ for an e5-2670, which individually is barely better than the 1650 in multi threading alone. But yeah, with this 160$ dell 2p board, and 2 2670s, you could have a pretty damn nice workstation / rendering machine / whatever the fuck you need all those threads for, and it would cost about the same as a modern i7.

>>57778472
http://www.overclock-and-game.com/hardware/computer-tech-reviews/28-x5660-review?showall=&start=4

Also, EVGA SR-2 is a 2P x58 overclocking motherboard.

>>57778544
It was stated that all kaby lake was was a revised skylake with better clock speeds.

So this 7600k trash is what we are left with for a year for the next release?

File: r.png (9KB, 363x170px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 363x170px

>>57778410
Who 65W processor here

>>57772494
I'm pretty good with my 3970x

>>57778677
This makes me feel fucking stupid after getting a 3970x for full price years ago...

I see no reason to go away from my 6700k atm

>tfw got my dual socket mobo and two E5-2670's for 170 dollars
feels good

>>57778206
Nsa collecting data

>>57778677
>3960x for $170
I saw those earlier and I was almost tempted, but every single X79 motherboard on Ebay goes for like $300, and at that point if you're spending $500 you might as well just buy X99.

>>57778770
The fact that the e5-1650 is for all intents and purposes the same thing as a 3930k with ecc support and is 90$ should make you feel stupid to be honest.

>>57778817
They were really cheap for a short while till youtubers like tech yes city started highlighting them.

>>57778844
Got my e5-1650v2 + P9x79 pro motherboard >>57775777
for under 300$. You just have to do a bunch of hunting and find sellers that don't know what they're doing.

>>57778911
>They were really cheap for a short while till youtubers like tech yes city started highlighting them.
I actually got them for cheap off chink sellers outside of ebay.

Although the problem with this is that I'm fucking stupid when it comes to used GPUs so right now my build is a walking mess.

File: tumblr_inline_nsupuhkait1s1ghpe_500.gif (1MB, 304x328px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 304x328px

>4.20 GHz

>>57778817
tempted to just get two of those... I want to upgrade from the 8350 and I don't think the 6700 is worth it....

>>57777861
Kaby Lake is just refined Skylake, tick-tock is dead.

>one day there will be a reason to upgrade from 2500k they said

how many years has it been?

>>57772809
they shouldn't be using it at all, AMD isn't

>>57780452
IT'S NOT FUCKING FAIR
I'VE HAD THIS CPU FOR FIVE YEARS AND IT STILL WORKS FINE
WHAT'S GOING ON
I WANT TO SPEND MONEY BUT INTEL WON'T LET ME
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>57772370
Jesus christ you guys. I am probably like middle of the road on /g/ technical knowledge wise. Okay so it has a ~1% real increase but that 7700k is running at 5ghz on what appears to be a max of 1.2something volts with temps under 80c. These things are going to clock significantly higher than skylake and will most likely be a really nice upgrade.

File: 1001.jpg (43KB, 320x320px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 320x320px

>tfw 3770k

goddamn i love this thing

>>57772230
>jewtel still unironically selling midrange i7 quad cores for $500usd 8 years later
Why?

Its not like 8 cores are fucking not needed they are just overpriced as fuck

File: speccy.png (143KB, 1540x409px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 1540x409px

>>57781479
That's how I felt about my 2500k, and my E8500, and my 1800+ etc.

>3570K

>tfw cpu is so good that you feel like you should only upgrade because the mobo is lacking newer features.

File: jelly.jpg (21KB, 450x343px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 450x343px

Is /g/ jelly on this?

>>57773502
...Or use http://sci-hub.bz/

>>57777884
yep that's pretty garbage actually, sorry

>>57775833
>82 degrees under load
It's like the Pentium 4 days all over again

>>57778295
It means that at the same clock speeds, both chips effectively perform the same with minimal difference.

File: 1456663949577.jpg (48KB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 320x240px

>>57772230
>420

Dude weed lmao

>>57777368
>X5650
>80 bucks
Wtf famalam, I actually bought one of those for just 25 on ebay, or did the prices go up now?

>>57772236
Why doesn't CPU-Z list the ME/AMT botnet that the CPU is equipped with?

I haven't bothered to OC by 6700k yet, what should I expect to be able to get it to clock and voltage-wise on air.

>>57772449
this plus the native 4k is the only thing going for it

member the 3950x? there was a chip

File: mylovelydualE5-2670's<3.jpg (387KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

387KB, 1920x1080px

>>57778911
The 3970X guy here
At least I was able to pick up two Intel E5-2670's and a mobo for 300$ before everyone else,
here's a lovely photo I took of them.

I still love the fact I can hit 5Ghz on a 12 core just barely, even if I did waste a grand.

>>57772370

hahaha, intelfag btfo.

>>57782284
My 3.4GHz Prescott is idling at a comfy 41 deg. C and wont' go over 70 under full load.

>>57772406
>muh games

Get out

>>57772370
Kek'ed. Gets me everytime I saw this picture.

>>57776754
Im not a regular on this board so let me offer some perspective
>But hey, at least you will get 4k Gilmore Girls from Netflix
you're really underestimating normie appeal right now

>>57777884
>going above 1.3
this is why we don't buy used chips. because people like you

>>57780847
You are thinking of it wrong.

Its not that they want to spend money, its that sandybridge is coming up on 6 years old, the motherboards are going to be dying soon, and they will be forced to either fork over 300+ for used of questionable quality, or buy a new computer that is in no way a real upgrade. If intel put out a 6 core, it would be enough for most people, but the platforms the 6 core is in cost a fuckload all things considered.

The first time many of these people may have an upgrade path is going to come with zen.

>>57781328
from the looks to me, it runs almost double the heat of a 6700k

>>57773213
>>57776237
>>57778677
>>57778817
>>57782418
>E5-2670
i want to ask a question about the 2670 because if zen fails, i plan to buy it.

about the 3.1Ghz Turbo, how long can it stays at that speed? is the 3.1Ghz is for all cores or just one? thanks

>>57782661
3.1 should be for all cores, and generally all-core turbo is maintained until the power limit or thermal limits come into play.

File: photo_1455842095527.jpg (1MB, 4160x3120px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4160x3120px

>>57782418
>>57782661
Mine's been boxed up but from what I remember when you stressed all cores it would boost up to 3Ghz
and to 3.3Ghz with four cores stressed
It runs very cool, having a stress test all night with an evo212 cooler- I could barely feel any warmth to the touch.

so this shit is coming out by the end of the year right?

File: images.jpg (5KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 225x225px

>>57782661
Got a 2680.
Running several servers on my host, a windows VM server, and a gaming VM.
It takes it all in stride.

The better cooling you put on it the more you can squeeze out of the turbo.

>>57783339
And by better cooling he means any generic 120mm tower cooler with a good fan on it will do fine.

>>57772230
>no time stamp
Why would I be jelly of a google image?

File: 1477851046957.png (280KB, 620x361px) Image search: [Google]

280KB, 620x361px

>>57772485
OP BTFO

Still pretty content with my i7 2600k and i7 920

File: Screen Shot 2016-12-01 at 1.20.51 AM.jpg (652KB, 1712x1280px) Image search: [Google]

652KB, 1712x1280px

>>57772230
no

are YOU jelly?

>>57773087
but muh enclaves

wow a .10 ghz increase

fucking savage, intel

>>57772404
you must be legally retarded

>>57772230
I already have 7700K


AMD

>>57782763
>>57783339
>>57783354
It always boggles my mind when people say that the stock cooler is all you need if not overclocking, when a cheap 20$ cooler can increase overall performance by enabling indefinite turbo clocks. Provided the psu and motherboard can supply the power consistently.

so is intel also, as nvidia, bruteforcing progress with higher clock instead of actually improving?

Unless you appear with a graphene CPU, i'll pretty much never be jelly.

>>57786275
But higher clock is an actual improvement,
though it should be improvement done via graphene.

Cores are the cancer.

>>57773087
You're quite the bullshit artist

>>57783537
mine's an 867, YOU jelly?

I have 6700k I don't need this chip i hear it runs at near 100C at Overclocked temps

Gee I thought Intel learned from the 100C T2400 C2D 2.0GHz moblie cpu
I know for a fact that blew up heaps of devices
I Guess some never learn from the past

>>57772442
>poor faggot
>Xeons are available on ebay in two packs for $150

>>57773040
Because it doesn't magically increase the performance of software that doesn't utilize them. Intel should do something similar to ARM where provide SIMD instructions for 1024 bits and stuff but emulate it with the smaller SIMD instructions if the processor cannot physically process 1024bits.

>>57773755
How does spending money make somebody not poor? What if I buy gold from a friend for $1000 and immediately sell it to him for $1000 and continue to do that forever. Would that make me infinitely rich since I make an infinite amount of purchases?

>>57782418
Enjoy your power bill. Just having two of them at stock speeds should be enough to keep you warm in winter.

>>57791534
I have one and I can't get it to warm my room...false advertising on that 115W tdp...

>>57791238
Not Haswell-E

>>57782333
I said two of them and they were going for $40 last I saw. You got a good deal.

>>57791636
Are you actually dumb enough to think 115W can heat your room?

>>57772230

i bet that cost over 1000, didn't it?

File: cinebench (2).png (25KB, 377x380px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 377x380px

>>57772259
top fucking kek

your CPU cost more than my whole damn computer and you still lost

File: IMG_1083.png (2MB, 1280x1707px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1280x1707px

>>57772370
Came here to post this

File: maxresdefault.jpg (66KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 1280x960px

>>57772230
lol u jelly fags?

>>57773155
You can buy older Xeons designed for single socket motherboards with higher clockrates and less cores. And they're often cheaper than the hex core ones.

>>57792315
Lol not having a cb score over 2000

File: image.jpg (155KB, 640x932px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 640x932px

>>57781328
It's hotter when overclocked
Not that skylake is lacking in the OC department anyways

>>57772230
Not really, overkill, but damn is it sexy.

nah not really its not that different feature wise than my 6700k and its speed is not enough to justify upgrading

>>57772230
>Can afford $350 computer price
>Impressive in shape or form outside of third world countries like poo-in-the-loo land
Not really Pajeet... You can go back to writing more boilerplate Java now.

>>57792517
>a whole 14 pins

funny

>>57792517
Oh yeah 750Khz

6800k master race

>>57792517
>ceramic package
nice

>>57792270
not him, but my old 95W q9550 sure did

>>57795640
Is your room 1 cubic foot?

>>57773427
You proud of yourself? You proud of what you just said? Kill yourself. Edgy fuck

>>57773540
They are the worst race of people. Fucking scum

>>57775445
Sorry i value my life. I'll get a 6th gen cuz it's powerful and not unnecessary like the 7th.
If you wanna cuck yourself by all means have fun

>>57775472
>B-b-but my gaping asshole

>>57775910
This. Fucking this.

>>57795687
No, but it was a tiny dorm room ~10' x 15'.

>>57778587
>>57782275
>>57782581
What would be good?

>>57776555
>Being this old and this stuck in ways
"Back in my times this was the best"

>>57796011
So you think a volume of 1500 cubic feet, assuming 10 foot ceiling, could be warmed by 95W enough for you to feel it?

>>57796072
How long is the computer on and how well insulated is the room?

You're gonna need a lot of physics!

>>57796114
I think it's safe to say he felt nothing.

File: 1478910346091.jpg (84KB, 907x661px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 907x661px

>>57772370

>>57772340
if you have Skylake you dont need Kaby (or probably even Cannon), I still have Ivy Bridge and dont give a shit

>>57778677
>>57776027
i bought those two things to use in a work station over my i7-3770K, though i can only put 16gb in it without buying more :(
i bought 32gb ECC but it didnt work

>>57776406
And I'll keep using my 32 thread virtualization server which outperforms your $300 cpu build.

Oh yeah and e5-2670s were $50 a pop.

C'mon, zen, come and save us. I want to build a few workstations for a client of mine next year.

>>57798031
V1's right? If v2s are 50 a pop I'm upgrading my s2600cp

so, what processor should i buy today?
6700k?

>>57796072
as an owner of a 3770k on water at 1.3v with a 970 kicking out a little heat as well, you can heat a fucking room with a computer

>>57798707
wrong

>>57782582
fucking this dude I don't want my motherboard to die I love it -_- my cpu can handle the overclock but I really don't wanna lose my beautiful mobo

>>57776224
>>57776092
You do have errata datasheets so you dont even know what bugs there are in your beta chip. Release versions of the chips have bugs, but at least compilers work around them. They will not for your beta chip. Keep on pretending you have a real Xeon

>>57799195
>do
dont

>>57796011

You live in a dorm and somehow you need to get used Xeons

File: 1479434078327.jpg (6KB, 240x210px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 240x210px

>>57781328
>upgrade
>the same performance

you the sort of fucker who buys the slim playstation?

>>57798746
someone lives in Antarctica or has never owned a computer that dissipates any real heat.
I googled 600 watt room heat and some weed growers would disagree with your opinion of thermodynamics
http://www.rollitup.org/t/how-much-heat-does-a-600-watt-light-produce.545602/

>>57799195
It is a real Xeon and it has the exact same bugs as the real deal. The only chance it doesn't is if it's an early sample from Pre qualification, in which case it can have additional problems. It certainly won't receive microcode updates if that's the case.

Either way you're talking about shit nobody cares about, cuz you're not talking about a 1000+ dollar product here, you're talking about scrap that at worst will have you depart with a few hundred dollars. The chance that it has issues bad enough to sour your experience at even that inflated price is negligible.

>>57783537
>Transmetasexual cpu

>>57772236
It clocks down to 800Mhz when not used?

>>57800113
yes all intel chips do it saves power

File: 1479528326606.jpg (169KB, 720x720px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 720x720px

>>57772230
lol jew fag

File: 900x900px-LL-bc234384_cinebenchwin.jpg (142KB, 900x508px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 900x508px

using a CPU that's nearly 5 years old, not even a K version and it'l still wreck you're 7700K.

File: 1203622889390.jpg (51KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 500x500px

I remember when we at least got 15% performance upgrade in each new generation and be happy with it.
Now people being hype for a codename change, what when wrong?

>>57801311
>1.544v

>>57799594
Ok dumbass.

>>57800477
Wrong. Mine clocks to 1.6Ghz
Thats why Im so surprised that this one clocks below 1Ghz

>>57775833
are they so much desperate?
they know that AMD will wreck them with Zen so they try to squeeze as much as they can.

>>57802800
>"Why would you use a motherboard with known issues (BLCK and RAM timings) to test a brand new CPU?"