SSD-Z Thread Let's do this. For science.

>>57762562
>35-50nm
>TLC
>0% over provisioning
Absolutley disgusting

>>57762562
just like a rostie about to hit the wall, your time is running out

tick tock, tick tock...

can you hear it? it is your time fading away...

>>57762619
>>57762685
kek

File: SSD-Z.png (30KB, 418x438px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 418x438px

how the fuck I've written almost 1tb already is beyond me

>>57764056
do you use firefox?

>>57764072
y-yes

>>57762562
>LE FOR LE SCIENCE XD
kys

File: Capture.png (46KB, 624x653px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 624x653px

>>57762562
850 EVO is a beast

>>57764056
That's only 15GB a day.
For 50GB a day you're looking at a memory lifespan of 35 years.

>>57764084
https://www.servethehome.com/firefox-is-eating-your-ssd-here-is-how-to-fix-it/

File: but why.png (76KB, 418x432px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 418x432px

>>57762562

>>57764112
Stay mad, fuck stain.

>>57764178
stay reddit, retard

>>57764134
What about it makes it a beast?

File: 1480103962772.jpg (75KB, 640x800px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 640x800px

>>57764143
Interesting, I didn't know that moving the cache off the drive wasn't enough. Thanks anon.

>>57764136
And thanks to you too, it's my first SSD so when I saw ~800GB I kinda panicked.

Must say that I DID format like 4 times just when I got it because Windows 10 sucked ass

File: SSD-Z.png (91KB, 854x518px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 854x518px

>punk ass punks worried about writing some data
>plebes, every last fucking one of you

>>57764155
>POH 855
>PCC 1

Intredasting.

>>57764191
Over 4TB written and still at 100% is awesome. It's also cheap and fast.

>>57764143
>doesn't mention chrome that eats even more
faggot

>>57764189
Stay shitposting, shitlord.

>>57764227
I thought you couldn't fix it in chrome tho

>>57764229
>shitlord
what other reddit insults do you have, le for le science man?

asshat?

File: ssdz.png (46KB, 432x444px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 432x444px

>>57764212
Not sure one should read into the 100%/0%

File: Capture.png (151KB, 959x783px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 959x783px

>>57764275
I meant 100% in this

File: ocz agility3.jpg (91KB, 430x442px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 430x442px

h-how am I d-doing?

File: ssd-z.png (26KB, 418x438px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 418x438px

>>57762562

File: Capture.png (28KB, 429x448px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 429x448px

>37.853 TB
>I've only owned it since September

How? I just boot Windows from this drive.

File: crystal.png (81KB, 688x538px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 688x538px

>>57764303
Ah.

File: ssd-z.png (26KB, 418x438px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 418x438px

>>57764315
More?

>>57764331

>Toshiba SSD
>oops

>>57764332
Curious to note that my 128 pro has 14~ TB in SSDZ but only 2 in Crystal.

>>57764331
Check the actual smart values.

>>57764336
This over provisioning going overboard.

File: ssd-z.png (26KB, 418x438px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 418x438px

>>57764378
Forgot image.

File: crucial.jpg (86KB, 413x433px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 413x433px

How can it have such a low file size for something with so much information?

>>57764378
Not sure how accurate it is, mine claims 100% overprovision for a 480GB SSD, so it's apparently a 960GB SSD in hiding.

>>57764399
it read almost all of that shit from the SMART and the SSD Firmware.

Would a Windows SSD/smart measurement tool be more accurate than the Linux equivalent?

The SMART test in the Gnome disk utility always gives me some wack numbers so I don't know of its failing or not. It's a Samsung 128GB.

File: ssd.png (43KB, 432x438px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 432x438px

now this ssd is super fast&durable

9/11 would recomend