o end a debate: Which consumes less power, SRAM or DRAM?

>>57712720
RDRAM master race.

Obviously SRAM. Did you even study this shit

>>57712749
Yes. My professor said otherwise, and I didn't agree with him, so I asked you guys.

>>57712773
WTF

SRAM is much simpler circuitry, requires no constant refreshes, IIRC it doesn't even draw any power at all unless you write to the cell, the only reason its not the most common RAM is cost/manufacturing difficulties

>>57712830
ikr

Any sources? I can't find any reliable ones who explicitly state that SRAM consumes less.

>>57712956
What Every Programmer Should Know About Memory

Or something along those lines.

>>57712773
Your professor was right, not you

>>57713079
Care to explain? Or present a source?

>>57713051
It really doesn't say

>>57712720
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Static_random-access_memory#Clock_rate_and_power
http://www.diffen.com/difference/Dynamic_random-access_memory_vs_Static_random-access_memory#Power_Consumption

>>57712773
>asking /g/ about anything
>ishygddt

But seriously, your professor is an idiot.