Piniform

File: Speccies.jpg (92KB, 753x488px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 753x488px

>>57710013

>>57710087
Have any OC on the 4790k?

>>57710099
Not as of yet, runs everything just the way I like it right now, maybe in a couple of years when it starts to show its age I might though. Next step will be getting a 1440p monitor, the gtx1080 is massive overkill for 1080p lol.

How about you?

>>57710141
At 4.6 oc right now on stock voltage. Runs pretty cool with a evo 212

File: speccy.jpg (177KB, 659x526px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 659x526px

>>57710809
>4.6Ghz at stock voltage
Ain't you a lucky fucker.

File: desktop speccy new hd.jpg (67KB, 830x578px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 830x578px

>>57710013

>>57711030
Silicon lottery mane.

File: specs.jpg (143KB, 816x717px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 816x717px

4790K @4.7GHz with 1.35v

>>57710087
What cooler do you have?

File: speccz.png (42KB, 701x590px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 701x590px

>>57711049
Waiting for Zen?

>>57711102
>All those seagate
Are those their newer drives? Their old ones have a terrible fail rate.

>>57711755

It's Seagate 3TB and 4TB drives with high fail rates. Not sure how Seagate fucked up that bad. Their 1TB and 2TB drives were fine.

File: Speccy_Nov27.png (37KB, 660x525px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 660x525px

>>57710013

>>57712859
>8350
kys poor fag

File: specs.png (30KB, 786x430px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 786x430px

somehow the laptop processor hasn't exploded yet

File: 1421895559607.png (56KB, 147x175px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 147x175px

>>57713768
rude

File: pc.png (50KB, 863x654px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 863x654px

>>57710013

File: 1476749115041.png (264KB, 509x508px) Image search: [Google]

264KB, 509x508px

>>57711049
>Piniform

File: 9550.png (77KB, 747x587px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 747x587px

>>57710013
It's Piriform you dyslexic faggot.

>>57713768
meh it was a good cpu when it came out

>>57715626
Here is from the 8350 review anandtech did back in 2012

>Ultimately Vishera is an easier AMD product to recommend than Zambezi before it. However the areas in which we'd recommend it are limited to those heavily threaded applications that show very little serialization. As our compiler benchmark shows, a good balance of single and multithreaded workloads within a single application can dramatically change the standings between AMD and Intel. You have to understand your workload very well to know whether or not Vishera is the right platform for it. Even if the fit is right, you have to be ok with the increased power consumption over Intel as well.


It wasn't even a great buy when it released.

>>57715674
What do you expect? AMD never recovered after Intel released the Core architecture in 2006.

>>57715681
Correct, I'm simply pointing out him trying to claim it was a good CPU when it released is just kinda silly.

I was deep into hardware at the time the 8350 released, I remember the AMD hype in the build up to it's release, and I remember the disappointment of reviewers everywhere as their fears were confirmed.

The latest AMD CPUs have all been disappointments at release and none have been "good" CPUs upon release since the athalon64 days.

File: speccyt40.png (37KB, 674x532px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 674x532px

I expected this thing to be a total dog with 7, but it's actually performing surprisingly well. All hail glorious Pentium M!