Would you drive a botnet car?

would like to, but the interiors are god awful

joke's on you, i don't have a driver's license

as the saying goes, you don't drive with the card, you drive with the car

joke's on you my car still has carburetors

>>57702815
>as the saying goes

There's no saying like that, you retarded faggot. Kill yourself.

>>57702815
What did he mean by this?

No, because I can get a Lexus LS or Toyota Land Cruiser for the same/cheaper.

ya i'd let it drive me while OP gf gives me head

then wen it drops us off id wave good bye to him as hehas an autistic tantrum that hes still a neet with no car and his gf just cucked him with a robot owner

>>57702777
Yes, if/when they become affordable.

>>57702777
Hell yes. The botnet does customer service right.

File: 1469668690252.png (117KB, 305x382px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 305x382px

>being smug as fuck because your car is """better for the environments""" while ignoring the hundreds of pounds of toxic batteries under your feet

THAAAAANKS

>>57702777
Yeah, after they use the model 3's earnings and make an even cheaper car.

>>57703082
>hundreds of pounds of toxic batteries under your feet
lithium isn't toxic.

File: 6c2664_4984723.jpg (62KB, 800x469px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 800x469px

>>57702840
maybe not in your 3rd world country

>>57703108
eat some lithium and tell us how that goes, retart

File: images (1).jpg (7KB, 298x169px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 298x169px

>>57703108

>>57703082
Good goil

>>57703108
look at lithium mines and tell me it's more environmentally friendly than coal or oil or even natural gas

>>57703220
Fuck coal and the shitty gas. Nuclear and solar when it's not shit are the future.

>>57702945

muh 0-60mph in >3s tho

>lithium
>mines

>>57702777
Yeah, once they become affordable too a poor fag like me. But by then hopefully some other brands are creating good electric cars too so I can pick the one that has the least botnet.

>>57703220
more environmentally friendly than your mom's gaping mines.

No, but I would let the bot drive for me instead and enjoy some youtube and a nap.

>>57703283
muh 0-60mph in <3s tho

ftfy

>>57703220
That's a bizzare comparison. The other mines you have to continue to mine it for energy. The lithium battery is but a medium we can continually store electricity into. They can also be recycled after their full life cycle.

I will never buy or own a car that can connect to the internet or be accessed remotely ever.
And you don't deserve to be on this board if you would.

File: fas34fr.jpg (101KB, 560x661px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 560x661px

>>57703460
ooops, you're right

>>57703143
Unlike fossil crap, you can recycle it.

>>57703220
I know that meme where a copper mine showed as lithium mine.

>anything as much as punctures the lithium battery, which is very likely to happen during a crash
>the entire thing bursts into flames
Sign me up for this deathtrap

>>57703739
>which is very likely to happen during a crash
There are NCAP tests without any flames.

>>57703890
yeah too bad in real life they do catch fire, just like that one that did a few months ago

File: 18d3rub5cd10qjpg.jpg (62KB, 500x365px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 500x365px

>>57703921
What not.

General motors pretty much have monopoly in making of car parts and cars have always been overpriced.

Looking forward to a mass hacking causing potentially hundreds of internet connected self driving cars to crash.
Terrible idea.

>>57703921
Gasoline also likes to catch fire.
So nothing changes.

File: lithium_mine.jpg (199KB, 1180x664px) Image search: [Google]

199KB, 1180x664px

>>57703220
What about them?

>>57703143
drink some gasoline and tell us how that goes, retart

If it weight less than 1000 kg, cost less than 10k$, handle like a miata, faster than a minivan, battery can least another 100k km before being changed when bought and a real roof.

>>57702777
I am heterosexual

>>57702792

Just one step towards self-driving cars for public use. No personal car for you, comrade.

The future is bright.

It will drive itself and connect to the internet... yeah sounds fucked.

Will the NSA be able to use these to kill reporters/whistleblowers/dissidents... probably.

>>57702792
this, touchscreens in a car are the stupidest thing ever. Why not just stick to physical fucking buttons? It's like these cunts have spent their whole lives riding buses or some shit and have no idea how much concentration driving a car requires

>>57702777
If it was self driving, fuck yes. I'm a filthy pot head and would love nothing more than to be able to get ripped while the car drives me everywhere.

>>57702777
I wouldn't drive a botnet car. but I'd be driven by a botnet car.

my benchmark is that when the car comes without a steering wheel, then I'll take it. If there are any manual controls in the vehicle at all, then they'll expect you to have to be sober and awake to use them, and fuck that. If I have to be sober and awake I might as well drive my own late-90s non-botnet car.