RISC architecture is gonna change everything.

>>57700340
RISC....is good

>>57700340
there will never be a true RISC machine because of muh backwards compatibility

>>57700585
But what about POWER

>>57700585
DIE CISC SCUM

>>57700340
>>57700340
I know what RISC means. It means reduced instruction set computer!

>ARM, originally Acorn RISC Machine, later Advanced RISC Machine, is a family of reduced instruction set computing (RISC) architectures for computer processors, configured for various environments. British company ARM Holdings develops the architecture and licenses it to other companies, who design their own products that implement one of those architectures—including systems-on-chips (SoC) that incorporate memory, interfaces, radios, etc. It also designs cores that implement this instruction set and licenses these designs to a number of companies that incorporate those core designs into their own products.

>>57700340
it already did

>>57700650
Doesn't matter. There are big corporations with billions of dollars invested into their software that runs on CISC and won't run on a RISC machine without complete re-writing which would cost an unimaginable amount. That's why modern day processors are mixed CISC/RISC, there will never be a true RISC machine.

>>57700681
so, basically OP was right. He is a faggot because he is just shitposting memes, but he is somehow right.

>>57700340
Pure RISC/CISC is a dead idea and ISA doesn't matter as much as architecture.

>>57700705
>Doesn't matter.
No you idiot, I mean the POWER architecture.

>>57700705
We don't write code in assembly anymore. If it runs on cisc it will on run on risc.

Is this a joke? The RISC revolution was like 20 years ago. Even x86 chips are RISC internally, have been since like Pentium II.

>>57700976
But the company behind the only compiler that works with our ancient non-standard COBOL code is long dead.

>>57700976
No. The same code doesn't run on processors with different architecture.

>>57701023
>Even x86 chips are RISC internally
CISC*

>have been since like Pentium II
CISC since the 8080

>>57700340
No, it was
>P6 chip, three times fater than Pentium. RISC changes everything

>>57701282
AMD64 chips are CISC over RISC

>>57701023
>>57701301
>muh x86 is risc
>people don't know the difference between RISC and reduced instruction CISC microarcitecture

>>57701337
>1337
irony

x86 is and always will be CISC by definition, even when it does not play much of the same role anymore
CISC does not have to be complex, but that doesn't make it RISC

>>57701338
That's not what was stated at all.
>>57701301
No, shut the fuck up.
https://youtu.be/wPrUmViN_5c?t=42s

>>57700670
kek

>>57700705
That is what cross-compilers are for, anon...

Why do people defend x86 so much? You're not Intel stockholders, so what do you care?

>>57700340
>tfw will never fuck 18 year old Angelina Jolie dressed as Spock
it hurts

>>57703571
>Why do people defend x86 so much?
It has proven to be the most efficient microprocessor architecture. Even that faggot Steve Jobs saw it.

>>57701410

Cringe: The Movie

>>57707002
HACK

>>57700675
I didn't know. Thanks bro!

>>57707045
THE

File: hqdefault (2).jpg (11KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 480x360px

>>57707122
PLANET

File: 1479558901128.jpg (15KB, 324x291px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 324x291px

>>57707167

>>57705698
My dick didn't know it wanted this, but thanks.

File: hackers-1680-01.gif (2MB, 1680x1050px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1680x1050px

here is the wallpaper from her laptop in the movie

>>57707899
I'd use it but it looks like it would get really old, really fast.

>>57700340
I've easily cranked it 2000+ times to her face.