Why don't we use ternary computers?

>>57698295
It took me several hours of slaving away on google, but I finally found the answer:

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/764439/why-binary-and-not-ternary-computing

>>57699244
>11/26/16(Sat)11:12:52
>11/26/16(Sat)12:32:08
>several hours
Nigga aint foolin me

File: davemustaine.jpeg.jpg (273KB, 467x650px) Image search: [Google]

273KB, 467x650px

>>57698295

whaddya mean we don't use temary computers?

>>57699284
It's sarcasm you fucking mongoloid

>>57698295
simpler hardware to create and wouldn't need to switch and retrain personal from binary.
>bluetooth is trash
>still standard for historic reasons
>x86 is trash
>still standard for historic reasons
list goes on. switching production from one to other takes change and money, so we stick to inferior things because it's comfy.