Which one? LG or Vizio

>>57674185
Rollin'

File: 1477333301827.png (699KB, 862x1368px) Image search: [Google]

699KB, 862x1368px

>>57674185
37 ge

get the lg. it has a higher refresh rate. that will make a difference when gaming.

>>57674185

>>57674185
they see me rollin, they hatin

>>57674241

You sure? It says 120 HZ but apparently this is 120 HZ "TruMotion" which is basically 60 hz in disguise with some special modifier.

https://www.cnet.com/news/fake-refresh-rates-is-your-tv-really-120hz/

>>57674181
neither of them is chroma 4:4:4 (they're 4:2:2). stay away.

>>57674181
if you're gonna use the tv to watch movies/tv shows, make sure the panel is a VA panel.
the panel in the LG is most likely IPS, which has a lower contrast ratio = dark scenes look greyish.

>>57674185
Rolling

>>57674375

LG is IPS

Vizio is VA

Although apparently the Vizio has a dynamic contrast ratio and the LG is native (lot better).

https://www.cnet.com/news/contrast-ratio-or-how-every-tv-manufacturer-lies-to-you/

>>57674449
the lg has dynamic contrast ratio as well. all tvs do.
the thing is the measurements of the native or real contrast in VA panels are better than the ones from IPS panels.
have you been able to find any reviews online googling the model number of each tv?

>>57674185
11 get

>>57674449
>Although apparently the Vizio has a dynamic contrast ratio
how do u know? it says native in the spec sheet

>>57674181
LG is better.

The Vizio doesn't do reds as well as the LG will, but any LG with a webOS is kinda sluggish. IMHO they both look good. but I would get the LG.

>>57674185
if i get someone i dont know ill watch the anime straight away
roll