Is there any chance Systemd will ever be replaced, or is it already too ingrained into Linux?. There are no major problems with the init system, but the scope-creeping is really scary.
Systemd is better, faster, perfect. The code base is very small, was slowly developed, and the code doesn't change very often. This has given time for it to be edited. Major distros have adopted it at will, and were not pressured in any way. Gummiboot, a part of Systemd, really exemplifies the Linux motto of "just works".
>>57640959
*audited
>>57640959
>google systemd
>article after article about bugs, security holes, and people bitching about it
>"it's perfect guys"
>>57640959
"better"
>>57641344
>>57641368
GUISE SYSTEMD IS Not Secure As SYSVINIT HUEHUEHUE NSA GET IT?
>>57641457
Great reading comprehension
>>57641512
No but that usually the way anti-systemd users lead
>>57640959
>Do one thing and do it well
>Init system implements a custom DNS resolver
>>57640959
Did no one of those who replied to this understand the sarcasm? Goes to show how ignorant you are.
>>57641838
>>Init system init's a custom DNS resolver
fixed
>>57641889
Haha, yeah, shows few here understand how Systemd came to be
>>57642508
"PID 1"
>>57640425
It's too ingrained, the devs working on tools it replaced have already given up and been assimilated.