> Straight support for C/Lua
> Very Small Library (Static Link or Dynamic...)
> MIT licensed
> Dozens of controls
> Portable as fuck
> Native draw (Supports also GTK, QT and even Motif). MacOSx native driver coming soon.
> very comfy website http://webserver2.tecgraf.puc-rio.br/iup/
>>57630732
It would be even better if it had some sort of designer program like QT Creator/Designer, that would be very useful!
>>57630732
no. libui is king now
>>57630732
>Tecgraf - Computer Graphics Technology Group, PUC-Rio, Brazil
>>57630732
Can one easily create custom widgets, though?
>>57630732
>Portable UI
>IUP
>not PUI
>>57630792
Roadmap for the Next Versions
Version 4.0
C++ API
Complete the Tutorial
Lua script editor and interactive debugger
Interactive Dialog Editor / Tools to improve productivity
>>57630848
Look at Internal SDK on the treeview (Last item)
Ttk with Tcl or Python
>>57630818
>pic
How libui can even compete? rofl
>>57630837
>implying
LUA was made by brs too
>>57631151
>Look at Internal SDK on the treeview (Last item)
Fucking garbage.
Also
> Native controls are also faster because they are drawn by the system.
>[citation required]
Good toolkits use the native draw methods so there is no difference.
Why does it leave the aftertaste of a bad Tk clone which itself is already a clusterfuck.
>>57631639
Tk's as simple-to-use as you can get.
Simple in implementation as well.
>>57631868
Doesn't mean it's good.
>>57631888
Themed Tk is good.
>>57630732
>> Portable as fuck
Where's the mac os version :^) ?