Consider the nation-wide porn ban pushes thru. What would the

>>57622281
People would go out and seek real sex.

>Enter your birthday before accessing this site
1900-01-01

>>57622281
Nothing, because the UK doesn't control the internet. The US controls the internet and American laws apply to the whole internet.

>>57622281
And what ban is that? Sounds like something a talk show host that never took a civics class, and can't spell snopes, would come up with.

VR sexbots production gets delayed

Torrents become relevant because normies who havent pirated in years desparately seek erections.

>>57622325

alot of the ban rides on enough.org/

it's ban mostly on obscene porn and CP which aren't protected under the first amendment, obscene can be misinterpreted

>>57622407
This. P2P sharing would have to become illegal. People would then turn to VPNs to mask their traffic and then encryption would become illegal and then the country would finally implode.

>>57622475

you realize that the industry IRL contributes to human and sex trafficking right, not to be a moralfag but porn transposed sexual behavior degeneracy

>>57622528
so you're in favor of a prohibition on pornography while posting on a cambodian pornographic image website

kys

>>57622563

do you remember when motherless had bestiality and its now a honeypot

you can't even discuss without ad hominem, just being a devils advocate

what is considered obsene and prohibited is serious ground for discussion because porn is intrinsically obscene to a certain degree (porn, not erotica)

It won't happen, just how a ban on tobacco or alcohol won't happen.

>>57622872
Except people are fine talking about tobacco or alcohol, but no one talks about porn because it's wrong/dirty/private/etc.

>>57622289

>people would go out and seek real sex

not likely, not everyone is a normie.

when you look at japan or even saudi arabia, society is so conservative on the outside leading to such degeneracy in the inside, it's just repression

so banning everything considered outright obscene is taking a viewership and enforcing repression into having the viewer consider it isn't normal so from a tech sense, that freedom is banned and it goes underground which could lead to further degeneracy

>>57622281
A very significant uptick in the use of Tor in the United Kingdom.

>>57622307
Nope, president "I won the 2008 draw so my executive orders are law" Obama gave away icann to the un a little while ago. They Haven't done anything yet but I'm sure they're just waiting for the right time to start the censorship.

>>57622289
>expectation: people would go out and seek real sex
>reality: people go to more obscure websites to watch porn and have a higher risk of getting malware, virusses or see weird shit.

People will just share these obscure sites with their friends.

> Hurr lets fix our declining population problem by banning porn

It probably has nothing to do with this shit at all. Search up "The beautifull ones". It's probably something more alike to this.

Besides, why interfere with people who watch porn? Would they not get eleminated from the gene pool eventually? It's a win-win situation for everyone.

>>57622528
Nope, you're talking about number stations or OTA encryption.

Most doing that shady kind of shit really really don't want to be discovered. Torrenting and VPNs is the LAST thing they would use.

>>57622295
>home key

Damn, is everybody doing this?

>>57622289
If you could just go out and have sex, why would you watch porn? Why would anyone?

>>57624334
Nigga fuck you. I ain't paying $200 every night to bust a nut even if I could afford it.

>>57624362

you know how zuck tweaked his precuckbook hot or not site with an algo to sort the hottest chicks

that kinda backfired you know, you'd assume tinder is where it's at but it's a prime place for attention whores and full blown weirdos

babyboomers - banned porn boomers

"Son, before you were born a law passed banning porn; so that's how I was compelled to meet your mother! Now hail the matchmaking overlords that united us in your birth."

>>57623274
I want to know why you think ICANN controls the internet.

>>57626353

I know right, ameritards thought they owned the internet prior kek

>who invented the world wide web vs tcp/ip debate
>domains determine ownership

if a ban on something like loli hentais or just pure bdsm passes, begs the question on what /g/entoomen holding that data would do

>>57626443
>begs the question
*raises

It will never happen. There's more people with massive amounts of money with a vested interest in keeping porn legal than their are on the opposition.

>>57622289
Only retards would believe this.

>>57626443
>I know right, ameritards thought they owned the internet prior kek
America basically does own the internet. Nearly every major website is headquartered here. But ICANN has no control over the web.

>>57622461
...but child porn is a good thing...

DAILY REMINDER THAT WE NEED TO LEGALIZE PROSTITUTION

JESUS FUCKING CHRIST ITS 2017

>>57626734
Are you a time traveler?