nvidia is literally finished

>>57611763
>lots of people buy it because it's cheap
>lots of people buy that specific model of third-party modification because it's cheap
>"wew lad novideo is finished"

nobody does this with linux distros

File: 1473996814187.png (260KB, 620x640px) Image search: [Google]

260KB, 620x640px

>>57611763

>Without in-home setup
>Include installation

w-what

File: 2INTENSE.jpg (65KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 225x225px

>>57612103
>An extra $49.95 just to install a GPU

Holy shit.

File: 1.jpg (35KB, 636x464px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 636x464px

>Nvidia is finished!!

http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/videocard/


There are more GTX 560 Ti, 9600 GT and GTX 970M FUCKING LAPTOPS in use than the AMD RX 480.

There are more GTX 1060 and GTX1070 than GTX 980 and GTX980TI.

AMD is the #1 brand preferred by poor people.

Does not make it a good thing at all. Wal-Mart is the #1 store preferred by people with no money. You ever been in a Wal-Mart? It's not good.

File: [HorribleSubs] New Game! - 09 [720p].mkv_snapshot_23.22_[2016.08.30_05.04.54].jpg (120KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 1280x720px

>>57611763
>include installation

>>57612206
A monopoly is good for noone except the people raking in profits.

File: GeFuccboiXXXGTR.png (944KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

944KB, 1920x1080px

>>57612206
noVIDYA GoyForce is the #1 brand preferred by good goys

File: 1457288255015.png (53KB, 802x799px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 802x799px

>>57611763
DELET THIS

>>57611763
>4GB
holy shit, gaymurs are retarded. you literally don't need a GPU with anything more than 1-2GB for gaming

File: absolutely.png (135KB, 288x415px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 288x415px

>>57612103
what the

>>57612359
>

File: mac23.jpg (47KB, 474x640px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 474x640px

>>57612359
Post proof of your claims or kindly shut the fuck.

>>57612384
get off my board you degenerate addict

File: 1239011291097.jpg (14KB, 355x362px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 355x362px

>>57612395
Strange, that doesn't look like proof.

File: 1458426306106.jpg (37KB, 348x342px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 348x342px

>>57612103
How did it come to this?

>>57612420
ugly 2d

>>57612408
>t. vidyacuck
Better start hoarding Top Ramen packs so you can afford to pay Schlomo Shekelchaim's subscription fees with your welfare cheque

>>57612420
The majority of the money is held by retards.

>>57612187
from 67 to 93... holy fuck

should i get GTX 970 or RX 470 ?
I was looking into the GTX 1060 but apparently it doesnt have any analog DVI video ports wich i NEED

>>57612359
Wrong, very wrong

>>57612359
You don't need to play games either

>>57612359
3 or more seems to have a positive effect on recent benchmarks

more than 4 is definitely retarded though

File: GT420.png (184KB, 515x299px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 515x299px

>>57612305

>>57613119
You should be able to get a 480 for the same price as a 1060

>>57613119
470 and 970 are about neck and neck right now I reckon but the 470 will get better in the future and has an actual 4GB.

>>57613119
get a cheaper graphics card and upgrade your monitor

>>57612187
>VIA/S3G UniChrome Pro IGP 6.85%
JUST

>Still no low profile card of this gen that can be shoved it into my slim pre-built Dell

>>57612460
No proof

>>57613346
just get a low profile Maxwell, it's the same shit

>>57611763
>$50 for installation
What
The
Fuck

>>57612420
IT WAS ONLY A KISS, IT WAS ONLY A KISS

>>57612305
>3.5 + 5 GB
YOU FUCKED IT UP

>>57613995
this. Fix this >>57612305 , fucker.

>>57612187
1050ti really helped them, kek.

>>57613173
this
more than 4 would actually be incredibly helpful for 1440p and up, but they gimped the bus bits so you're forced to buy next years model for the gainz moar ram should supply.

>>57611763
This is what the RX480 should cost but they don't

>>57614627
true.
real question is why is AMD allowing nvydia to have a monopoly with three gpus outperforming their current generations best?

>>57613346
>>57613679
There's a low profile 1050ti soon to be available
https://www.msi.com/Graphics-card/GeForce-GTX-1050-Ti-4GT-LP.html#hero-overview

>>57612206
>Walmart
>It's not good
>Top company on Fortune 500
Kek

>>57614733

Because they're incapable of making a competitor to those cards on their garbage architecture.

Look at their last attempt. Fury X, so fucking hot it needed mandatory water cooling and still ran hotter than most competitor cards on air.

They make $200 shitbox Polaris GPUs that already run like nuclear power plants, they scale that up and you're going to need a 1600W PSU and mandatory liquid nitrogen cooling this time around.

>>57613346
There is the Radeon Pro WX 4100.

Why does AMD have nothing to compete with even a GTX 1080 nevermind a Titan X Pascal?

>>57614933
>>57614863

>>57614863
yeah GCN is old and fucking useless at this point.
HBM is epic and the nano is amazing.
wasn't nvydia supposed to release HBM2 cards like 6 months ago? as was AMD...

At least AMD doesn't include telemetry in their drivers (yet).

>tfw you wish there were more people who cared about the stuff you care about so that you could become a market force and punish companies who engage in shady practices, rather than just taking it like everybody does

>>57614933
Less R&D cash.
Vega should launch around the same time as the 1080Ti ( early next year) and bring if not higher performance, then at least close to it with a higher theoretical maximum peak compute capability.

>>57615043
It's not in the driver.
It's in the GeForce experience automatic game setting adjuster and is literally needed for it to do what it does.

>>57612305
8.5GB OF GDDR5 OMFG

>>57613995
>>57614462
>>57615105
>implying I made it

>need new gpu
>has to look nice because front of graphics card is visible from seating position
>want asus rx480/gtx1060 because of nice LED lighting
>it's the most expensive model
>can afford but will feel bad

what do
all others are ugly
why can't the orange part on the gigabyte cards be rgb led

>>57615290
get a 3d printer and make your own.
or just take it off and paint it yourself
or stop being a faggot who cares about color coding.

>>57615290

You are the cancer in custom PC building. Fuck you and all your disco twink dancing LED light shit. All the high end shit has faggot ranbow LEDs for retarded gay teenagers.

>>57611763
You know they put #1 best seller on lots of stuff at the same time right? It's the same tactic as "#1 BEST SELLER" on books and movies, it's never true, they just want you to think that so you'll be more confident to buy it rather than think about it longer.

>>57615577
The LEDs make it run faster and helps you get laided, duhh.

File: 1476928798769.png (317KB, 525x420px) Image search: [Google]

317KB, 525x420px

>>57615090

>He bought and defends the botnet

>>57615589
only reds are for speed
blue is for better cooling
duhhh
rainbow is for dragondildos and super aids

>>57613119
My mate has a 970 oc to 1550 mhz and it's a beast of a card. If you can manage to find a 970 with a good aftermarket cooler, oc the shit out of it and it'll be way better than the 470.

File: 1479094873232.jpg (371KB, 500x750px) Image search: [Google]

371KB, 500x750px

>>57615613

>>57615629
For like $20 extra dollars he can get the RX 480.

>>57611763
>4GB
>NOT 8GB
NO TY

File: 20161121_142940.png (706KB, 1439x2067px) Image search: [Google]

706KB, 1439x2067px

I'm pretty sure amazon just slap on a best seller logo on any remotely popular product.

>>57611763
>literally
Sure kid. Just like all those times they, or Intel or AMD were finished.

Do us all a huge favor and end your worthless life.

>>57612103
>open up case
>remove GPU
>install new GPU
>close case

Unbelievable.

>>57615677
An overclocked 970 is better than a 480 though. I still remember all those benchmarks where a moderately oc zotac Amp 970 was beating a 480.

>>57615690
Literally just ordered that card.

>>57612359
There are lots of games you can't play with less than 2GB of RAM in your card.
t. Radeon 6870 user

Thankfully I have a huge backlog and modern games are pretty shit.

>>57615690
Different category

>>57613173
Ever play gta v?

>>57615690
>50 tags on an item
>#1 peak within last week in one of those tags
>display it
I've figured out your scam, Bezos! *unsheathes kukri*

>>57615290
Oh fuck off

>>57612359
A lot of games being ported from XB1/PS4 eat up a tonne of VRAM.

File: 1478902780563.png (35KB, 321x357px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 321x357px

>>57615785
>3.5gib of vram is better than 4gib of vram

File: 1.7%.jpg (210KB, 618x947px) Image search: [Google]

210KB, 618x947px

>>57611763

>>57612460
really controlling the hell out of that damage my man!!! fuck those /v/edditors am i right?????

>>57615847
Gta 5 runs fine on a 2gb 750 ti. It runs better than the consoles at even higher settings and gets good framerates.

>>57615842
there are 2gb 6870 versions..
the only thing holding it back are drivers.
go figure, le no drivers maymay is true, only for both companies
pretty pathetic how developers are willing to cut off previous gen cards rather than just forcing you to reduce setting. now they're prevented from being played regardless of power.
never giving these shitbags my money again, i'm not perpetuating this horse fuckery.

>>57613119
480

>>57615868
Terrible bait my friend

>>57615893
Turn the settings beyond medium and the resolution beyond 768, I can easily get gta v up above 5gb of vram at 1080p

>>57615785
>still remember
What, on launch drivers in 1 or 2 gimpworks DX11 games?

Cool.

File: 1471962885739.jpg (435KB, 913x769px) Image search: [Google]

435KB, 913x769px

>>57615785
Please enlighten me what 970 can be overclocked to 1.6GHz

Also
>3.5

Which one has best drivers on Linux these days?
Asking because I have a pet project renderer written on my thinkpad gentoo meme machine and I'd like to get a distro on my desktop box and see how nice it can look on a big screen with a beefy card.

>>57615910
I run the game pretty much maxed out in the normal graphical options and use long shadows from the advanced graphics options and I never hit the 4gb limit on my gpu

>>57615929
None, stop taking linux so seriously. It's only real function is to let you rice the shit out of your desktop to post in desktop threads to get internet points.

>>57615918
Who said anything about 1.6ghz?

Also
>posting vendor biased games

>>57615785
>still remember
well see here's your problem. The 10xx series has released and 9xx series performance has fallen like a brick. You might want to re-check all of those benchmarks now.

File: 1470344503672.jpg (134KB, 614x442px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 614x442px

>>57615992
>>posting vendor biased games
nope, just DX12 titles

We kept telling you lack of full hardware async compute was going to become a huge problem for novydia GPUs but you wouldn't listen.

You dug your grave, now lie in it.

File: Screenshot_20161121-150121.png (3MB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2560x1440px

>>57615918
>kek

File: 1478878906134.jpg (40KB, 960x724px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 960x724px

>>57616039
>posting an amd favored game

>>57616039
>nothing runs that shit game at 60fps stable
why even bench it?

File: rottr_1920_1080.png (30KB, 500x650px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 500x650px

>>57616039
OK, here's a dx12 title

>>57616051
>4/5 fps differences
>looks exactly the same

ayyy

>>57616094
Hitman is the worst optimised peice of shit I've ever played. I bought the Paris map to see what it was like and I had to unistall if from steam after 5 hours because of the fluctuation frametimes and the massive instantaneous fps drops. I asked around and apparently it's some common issue with the game.

>>57615894
Yeah it sucks. I'm waiting until I can build a whole new rig that's VR ready at a better price. It's a good thing I'm patient.

>>57616107
>>57616051
This game has been brought to you by nvidia(tm) the way it's meant to be played (c) (tm)

>>57616116
>4/5 frame differences with amd being the worst
>looks exactly the same
>amd cards having a much higher vram utilisation because of shit memory compression
>fury x nearly at its VRAM limit

>>57616116
framerate readers are always within 5-10fps off too.

>>57616165
What about that fancy system Digital Foundry uses?

>>57616153
5 fps difference doesn't matter as long as it's stable and yes, looks exactly the same.

Maybe if it looked bad in movement, but no way of knowing that with an image.

>>57616136
same.
all these rebrands released just to milk autists
but eh, you know waht they say about fools and their money

>>57616165
No.

>>57616136
With VR, the longer you wait, the better off you'll be. I'm thinking I'll probably take the VR plunge in 2018.

>>57616193
>stable 56 fps
>stable 62 fps (60 with vysnc)

I know which one I'd take

>>57616280
filmic 56 FPS yeah?

>>57612206
>You ever been in a Wal-Mart? It's not good.

>No1 retail company in the world
>$500 billion revenue last year
>2.3 million employees

yeah nah, you're a cunt

>>57615681
this.
Pull out all the stops

>>57616367
the human eye cant see more than 3.5gb of vram

File: arch-linux.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>57613913
Anime belongs on /g/

>>57615681
there's literally no difference between the two performance wise
le gimped bus=bandwidth not even capable of making proper use of 4gb
let laone 8gb

>>57615772
But computers are scary, what if you broked it?

>>57616432
Go read a compare between the 4 vs 8 gb models
its not just the memory size

File: 1455263720269.png (159KB, 435x419px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 435x419px

>>57612305
>3.5+5 GB
>8.5GB
dafuq

>>57612133
What the fuck? $50 just to snap a fucking component to a motherboard? When I built my computer that was the fastest part.

>>57612359
>Not factoring in new developers that can't optimize at all.

>>57617292
yes it is...
only nvidia gimps cards with less vram
otherwise it's the same bus speed and stream processor count

>>57611763
Holy shit how can Nvidia even compete with this deal? I'm buying 3 for my cousins and 2 for me.

THANK YOU BASED RAJA
THANK YOU BASED LISA

>>57611763
They should be buying it on newegg to get civilization 6 free

>>57615690
I wish they shipped to this shithole of a country I live because that same card is around 500 dollars here.

>>57617692
i'm pretty sure ocuk delivers abroad. don't know the shipping costs though.

https://www.overclockers.co.uk/zotac-geforce-gtx-1060-mini-6144mb-gddr5-pci-express-graphics-card-gx-106-zt.html

>>57613963

HE TAKES OF HER DRESS NOW LET ME GOoOoOoOoOoOo

File: 20161120_150611.jpg (4MB, 5312x2988px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 5312x2988px

Bought this yesterday for 370. Did I do good /g/?

It replaced a GTX 760 4GB FTW

File: furyx.png (515KB, 1228x1268px) Image search: [Google]

515KB, 1228x1268px

>>57615055
>Vega should launch around the same time as the 1080Ti ( early next year) and bring if not higher performance, then at least close to it with a higher theoretical maximum peak compute capability.

Vega 10 will perform 2-2.5x higher than Polaris 10, depending on the 4096 shader and 12 TF numbers (= 1.45 GHz) being true and whether AMD skimps on fixed function units like they did with Fiji.

The things AMD needs to not have Vega be Fiji 2.0:
> divide the 4096 shaders/64 CUs across 8 SEs with a geometry and raster setup unit each, instead of using 4 SEs with 16 CUs each
> Use 3 RBEs/12 ROPs per CU
> Get closer to theoretical bandwidth limits on HBM2 than they did with HBM1
> actually work with engine devs and the driver team to make use of massive fp16 throughput

>>57618002

Bad Goy, Didnt fall for the EVGA HOUSEFIRE meme.

>>57615862
>tonne

speak english

>>57618057
Yeah. Was actually going to get a 1070 FTW but all they had were the DT (Detuned) models and I'm not paying for a stock clocked card that was supposed to be OCd from the factory. This is my first bout with an Asus card so I hope it lasts like my EVGA ones have.

>>57618137

You did good young faggot, the only problem is you probably should have gone with MSI since Asus costumer service is completely retarded.

>>57612305
the plural of goy is goyim silly goy

>>57618002
should have bought zotac. they have the best value 1070s.

>>57612187
>9600 GT

That was a fine video card. It served me for 6 years.

>>57618185
The only MSI card they had was priced 70 bucks higher and looked like ass in comparison. I'm happy so far and fingers crossed won't have to RMA it any time soon.

>>57618278
None in stock and was almost the same price (8 bucks difference in store because of diacounts.

>>57612187
wow I figured tech stocks would go down a little after Trump won

>>57618286

Just praise kek and everything will be fine. Remember to use the best memes only.

File: 970.png (943KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

943KB, 1920x1080px

>>57614462
K, fixed.

>>57611763
even if they sell twice as many of these as nvidia sells of their 1080s, nvidia is still gonna make twice as much money

File: 2.jpg (31KB, 300x100px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 300x100px

>>57613913
>on 4chan
>ridicules anime fans

>site has banners like this

>>57618563
Come to think of it, that banner is probably older than the anti-anime normies. That was what, 2005?

>>57611763
so this is the power of the price/perf of amd....

File: 1475591123643.png (13KB, 266x220px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 266x220px

Do you guys think the high levels of EMR generated by AMD GPUs insane power usage is what causes AMDrones to be so retarded?

ITT: poor ayymd pajeets try to explain their poor decisions

>>57618002
>asus
Should've went for the MSI.

>>57613119
470 for the HEVC support.

>>57617900
I JUST CAN'T LOOK, IT'S KILLING ME

>>57618280
> use mx440
> everything runs like shit, tons of stuff is not even supported, everything also looks like shit
> finally getting a proper card
> oh boy AM I FUCKING HYPED
> dad asks his friend who built computers decades ago
> it's christmas
> it's an FX5200

Had no idea what will the card do.
... drumroll ...
Nothing.

It had all the new 'effects' (features/capability), but EVERYTHING ran like dog shit on it.

;_;

>>57618002
where the fuck did you get it for $370

>>57618002
Of course.

>>57612187
voluntary survey that 90% of steam users never get the option to answer

>>57611763
https://youtu.be/iJKU-w4pK1M?t=4

>>57621243
That's every single person who's ever installed Steam.

Steam EULA says they collect data of your hardware spec and can publish anonymized aggregated statistics off of it.

>>57615868
is that HTH

>>57621243
>>57621365

his argument wouldn't even make sense if it was only a subset of steam users, 10% of ~150 million is more than enough to get accurate stats to within a very small margin of error.

>>57621365
not him but certain users get a popup where they have to select internet speed and other things steam cant measure, and then they make list of your hardware settings that you can review and choose if you want to submit or not. hardware info sent to steam is unrelated, and survey is 100% voluntary and participation is very small which is why you don't even know how it works

>>57621500
>hurr durr how do statistics work?

you need to be 18 to post here

File: 83c.png (157KB, 480x375px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 480x375px

>>57621540
xdddd

>>57621648

on top of not knowing how statistics work, you also do not know how images and compression works, do you?

>>57621753
static WebM is where it's at

>>57618381
>even if they sell twice as many of these as nvidia sells of their 1080
They're selling 20-30x more. Obviously that's a range pulled out of my ass but you get the point. Clearly AMD is selling many more than 2x the number

File: Nvidia-GTX-1080-EVGA-FTW-Catches-Fire.jpg (156KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 1280x720px

NVIDIA is the Samsung of the graphics market in the way that all their hardware blows up and literally burns peoples houses down.

>>57612359
i was going to post something like this but the opposite way. 4GB isn't enough in 2016

>>57621201
Microcenter.

>>57619685

AND TAKING CONTROoOoOoOoOoOoL

File: (you).gif (415KB, 480x238px) Image search: [Google]

415KB, 480x238px

>>57613645
>>57615892
niggers

>>57616280
>not opting for 14 fps for the optimal cinematic experience.

File: 1463994648309.png (2MB, 1000x967px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1000x967px

>>57612133
>Friend paid $200 to have someone put his computer together, then paid them $200 again to rebuild it because he broke his motherboard within the first day

>>57612359
Hmm must be hard, having some kid steal your girl over the internet. Let's take a moment to ignore the dumbfuck

>>57618577
>2005
That one is from 2003 baka senpai desu~. I can't remember when Marmandy Jones got a banner for saving fortunes, though. 2004, 2005?

>>57626109
>implying the motherboard dying wasn't the assembler's fault

>>57612133
>>57617387
you have to pay an employee to get in a vehicle and go to the place. You need to pay for the associated costs of that employee. You need to pay for the associated costs of that vehicle.

Of course it's not worth $50 but that's how much it costs (minus the built in profit), that's the cost of being dumb. I have absolutely no problems with that.

File: Screenshot_21.png (125KB, 503x429px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 503x429px

>>57611763

yeah man totally finished

http://investor.nvidia.com/results.cfm

http://seekingalpha.com/article/4022322-nvidia-nvda-q3-2017-results-earnings-call-transcript

>>57622855
i guess AMD is apple then? they might as well be since their GPUs are always in apple computers nowadays

>>57630622
Not sure if that's a diss or not. Apple is pretty solid

>>57612187
/thread

>>57612187
And yet they somehow arent selling better than the 480 hmmmmmmmmm

>>57612206
this is amazon retard, not shartmart, everyone buys from amazon

>>57614863
>150watts
>nuclear power plant
retard

>>57614933
they dont need to

I'm looking to upgrade my gtx960, would a 1060 be a big increase or am I better off saving for a 1070 or 1080? I'm a poorfag and only want to spend between 200-300 on a card

>>57632247
No you are better off getting a 480, there is a reason its the best seller

>>57618002
WHIRRRRRRR

File: asdf.jpg (273KB, 1279x942px) Image search: [Google]

273KB, 1279x942px

most popular cards in germany

File: dx12.png (93KB, 781x889px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 781x889px

>>57616149

>>57632352
This game has been brought to you by nvidia(tm) the way it's meant to be played (c) (tm)

File: bf1-benchmark-4k-dx12.png (30KB, 712x609px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 712x609px

>>57632401

The GTX 1060 may still have the lead in terms of performance but the RX 480 is gradually gaining ground.

http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=https%3A%2F%2Ftweakers.net%2Freviews%2F4899%2F10%2Frx-480-en-gtx-1060-negen-videokaarten-getest-3dmark-fire-strike-en-time-spy.html&edit-text=

>>57612187
AMD owns 57% of the gaming hardware market. It has it's GPGPU's in both the PS4 and Xbox which don't get taken into account on Steam.

Bought a 6GB 1060 this morning.
I regret nothing.

>>57632509
sure

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYdDKi3-sYw

13 new games tested on both GPU's. The shocker here is The Witcher 3 runs around the same FPS on the RX 480 as the GTX 1060.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NMM5UFFSrSk

File: aha.png (25KB, 615x254px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 615x254px

>>57633359

>>57633359
You can't really compare DX12 here, since the implementation in BF1 is buggy on AMD and Nvidia cards, see the thousands of articles about the stutter issues.

Under DX11 the 1060 is a good chunk better, and still faster than 480 in DX12

>>57632509
>gaymersnexus
>testing on dx12 (DICE still hasn't gotten it working on bf1)
really trying hard aren't you?

>>57634160
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHC1230OpOg

>>57616107
>Fury x slower than 1060
Yeah sure, shill.

>>57634528
he's right though. hardwareunboxed, jokerproductions, guru3d, techspot, gamersnexus, hardocp and a bunch of other, lesser known sites have all done benchmarks using dx12 mode and they all came back with the same conclusion which is that dx12 mode is broken in bf1.

>>57634946
hes right that dx12 is broken, hes wrong that nvidia is better, BF1 is one of the games where AMD is better regardless of the API

File: bf1.png (63KB, 680x438px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 680x438px

>>57635036
false. nvidia has the edge in dx11 but drops off in dx12. going by the benches with the 1060 vs 480 (1080p):

>guru3d

1060: 95
480:94

>gamers nexus

msi 1060: 95
msi 480: 87

>techspot

1060: 94
480: 92

>hardware unboxed

1060: 94
480: 92

>inb4 cherrypicking

these are the first 4 links which came up on google, and most people will agree these are all reliable sites.

>>57635215
stop cherrypicking faggot, no matter how much you shill nvidia the 480 will still always be better than the 1060

File: 1476646598420.png (652KB, 821x767px) Image search: [Google]

652KB, 821x767px

>>57635320

>>57612187
Dat spike though

>>57635407
jim cramer shilled nvidia on his cnbc show, all the sheep bought it up. I wonder who was behind this

Why do people use video game bechmarks as a reliable way of judging and comparing graphic cards WHEN THEY NEVER FUCKING REDO THE BENCHMARKS WITH NEW DRIVER RELEASES.

>>57635837
Which is why I searched Youtube for a newer than 1 month video. See.

>>57633359

Nvidiolts are lookimng at *OLD* benchmarks.

>>57635837
tbf benchmarks are pointless full stop. most benchmarkers use reference cards which aren't representative of like 99% of all consumers since everyone buys aftermarket gpu's.

take bf1 for example, the 390 in all benchmarks wins by like ~6/7 fps over a 970 yet joker productions did a test of the 2 most popular aib 390 and 970 and the 970 won by ~6/7 fps this time. gamers nexus is the same with the 1060 and 480. there is usually only a 2/3 fps difference in the benchmarks between a 1060 and 480 in bf1 yet gamersnexus found an 8 fps difference when comparing 2 similar priced 1060 and 480 from msi, both with factory oc.

it's just a plain fact that nvidia offers more for your money and has superior aftermarket performance compared to a competing amd card at the same price point (~£10). at stock, the amd cards generally always wins after 18 or so months due to driver improvements but nvidia still dominates the aftermarket.

>>57637054
>writing a wall of text no one will read
>thinking anyone will believe your bullshit shitpost
fuckoff. nshidya is more expensive for the exact same thing.

>>57637528
Nope. I bought my msi 390 for 329.99 about 14 months ago at a time when 970's were retailing for between 280 and 320. I thought the 970 was shit at the time though so I bought the 390 also because I wanted to move to 1440p soon after, also at the time I was pro amd because I had a sapphire 1950 before that in my old prebuilt. Turns out it's only good for 1080p 60 fps in most cases, and I wasted money because one of my best friends evga gtx 970 ftw edition outperformed me in pretty much every game, he had a 1520 mhz oc but my 390 could only get to 1080mhz core and 1450 memory. I have a 1070 now though so it's all cool.

>>57637907
In DX11 it is proven time and time again that Nvidia rules the roost. Things are changing a bit with new DX12 titles but I think unless Vega pulls a fast one Nvidia have this covered as well going by recent DX12 scores. I was really surprised to see the GTX 1060 equaling the RX 480 in Doom Vulcan performance in the above link. It just goes to show how good Nvidia's implementation of DX12 preemption actually is.

>>57632299
No coil whine under full load.

>>57612359
Go back to linus hardware or tomstechtips, we don't like your kind here

>>57637907
>>57637999
more walls of text no one will read...
you getting paid per word or what?

>>57611763
nvidia is like 6x marketcap of amd.

>>57637907
>970 beating an r9 390
things that never happened