In case you're wondering, every single one of those 3 buttons

>>57583635
>The most trivial crap has to be done through the terminal.
Nevermind, terminal crashed on a rm -rf! Good job Apple!

Hackintosh?

>>57583635
gr8 b8 m8

>>57583635
windows file manager does the same thing, you need TeraCopy or whatever the mac equivalent is

best os of all time

>>57583635
it works on my machine

poorfag hackintoshers should just stick with windows forever

>>57585526
10.6.8

The longer I look the funnier you become

File: IMG_20161119_131155.jpg (1MB, 4160x3120px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4160x3120px

>>57583635
Your solution (though you should remove systemd and rebuild policykit with systemd disabled) is here.

>>57587129
(debian)

>>57587129
>installs suicide linux on a mac
>starts living on the floor

File: 1457888617724.jpg (24KB, 480x359px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 480x359px

>>57583635
MACTODDLERS

KUCKED

AGAIN

>>57585519
No, it doesn't. There is a Ignore button and it works.

>>57583635
Don't forget:
>can't maximize windows, only fullscreen or fit to content (seriously what the fuck)
>can't tile windows by dragging them to an edge of the monitor

Unusable garbage

File: 1479118057948.webm (544KB, 1764x1080px) Image search: [Google]

544KB, 1764x1080px

>>57588313
lmao

>>57588798
>doesn't maximize
Thank you for proving my point

File: 1465582565289.webm (3MB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 480x360px

>>57588816
ayy

File: Mega_c09642_6085693.jpg (37KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 480x480px

>>57588798
>this is what dumb googles actually believe

File: 1477574788456.png (275KB, 652x378px) Image search: [Google]

275KB, 652x378px

OSX hate thread?

File: 1449333366366.png (377KB, 2718x968px) Image search: [Google]

377KB, 2718x968px

>>57588935

>>57588798
>Are you purposefully making yourself look like an idiot?

>>57588798
>first maximize
kek

>second maximize
topkek

>>57589003
>If I had known how much power this feature had
JESUS FUCKING CHRIST

literally the only bad thing about os x is finder
>>57588313
>2 maximize options
>not enough apparently

>>57589813
A fullscreen option and a "fit to content" option are not maximize options. They're just shitty attempt at trying to "think differently xD"

>>57589843
or maybe YOU are too used to wincuck mindset? The fit-to-content option came before windows, thus it`s MS thinking differently.

>>57589879
>or maybe YOU are too used to wincuck mindset?
Or maybe that's just a shitty excuse? This isn't a Windows mindset, every other desktop environment has this basic feature. Why didn't Apple just add the "fit to content" option AND the maximize option? This is just an insanely bad choice that Apple has made.

>>57589879
Fuck the content, I want it to take up my whole viewport, so I can concentrate on it. I don't need a dick-length wide bar down the side to see some fucking 30 pixels of my gay fucking desktop background.

Fuck macs, holy shit I hate them so bad. I wish I didn't have to use one for work.

>>57589947
every other? even tiling ones?
plus, TO ME, fit-to-content is a basic feature
and there is the fullscreen after all!
>>57589961
there is the second option, fullscreen

>>57589998
I do not want to blank my secondary screen.

I don't know why that's a fucking thing. Which fucking inside out asshair fucknit thought that was a good idea?

>>57590058
that`s just a bug in some versions.

>>57589998
>every other? even tiling ones?
Tiling window managers aren't desktop environments, but they use your entire screen, unlike OS X.
>plus, TO ME, fit-to-content is a basic feature
Alright, but every desktop environment should be able to maximize a window. There's just no excuse for that.
>and there is the fullscreen after all
Which is shit and inconvenient in most cases.

>>57590077
Yeah, any version of OSX and macOS Sierra.

Nigga I fucking worth with this shit. I know what I'm saying. If you set it so "spaces" apply to all screens, not just one, when you fullscreen something, it blanks your other screen.

>>57588798
What is the rationale behind this? Why not just simply maximize?

>>57590367
Dude, like, think differently! :D