So which one is correct here?

>>57580261
Running them at the same will affect their respective results as they each use the CPU moderately to quite heavily.

>>57581477
I doubt OP was retarded enough to run them at the same time

Each application provides different set of tests, so they show different results

Testing a 1 GB file with those speeds will always be unreliable.
Try to bench something like 100 GB multiple times and then take an average.

>>57581489
Do you know who you're talking about?
Do you know where you are?
>>57581477
/thread

>>57581516
>autism

File: 1446882836359.jpg (75KB, 1167x740px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 1167x740px

>>57580261
Magician

>>57580261
whichever one is the worst stats, your rig sucks

>>57580261
Always take the lowest reading.

>>57580261
Keep in mind that doing these immediately after another will also fuck up the readings due to temperature throttling.

>>57580261
Probably none of them because that's your boot drive. Who knows what was going on in the background.

I suggest you just enjoy your new SSD instead of fretting about numbers. Are you noticing some kind of performance issue?

File: 1469151631199.jpg (5KB, 130x184px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 130x184px

>>57581516
MLC SSD cache user here.
They're much too resilient for that to do a thing.