>Let's be honest with our Technology-Gods
>Precision 690 with 2x Xeon X5355
>>57542838
Wow, you bought literal garbage.
>>57542850
The pair of xeons match a midrange i5. Considering it probably cost $100 that's not terrible.
>>57543138
Maybe in a perfectly multithreaded application, but an i5-760 or whatever will murder it in single thread.
Your garbage is not impressive.
>>57543165
True, the IPC of the new i5s is miles ahead of the core2 series.
>Your garbage is not impressive.
L2read, not my post.
If it were a Westmere/Nehalem build it would be notably better, the X5650s are only a bit behind an i5-6600k.
>>57543205
Westmere is garbage, too.
>>57543226
Umad that an old proc can keep up with your build?
>>57543249
No, it can't.
>>57543262
What do you have? I'll bet it can.
>>57543326
1650v3 at 4.5GHz.
I bought: Samsung Galaxy S5
What I expected: A good phone
What I got: A shit phone with alot of gimmicks
>>57543405
Point taken, you have a Xeon. The Westmere and Nehalem would compete against i5s and i7s depending on clock speed, not modern Xeons.
what i bought
> note 7
what I expected
> chinky iphone ripoff
what I got
> burned down 18 story apartment complex
>>57543443
The i7-5820 or whatever is equivalent, so.