When will tech companies realize that 16:9 was a mistake?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nKJgGzdMLnU

fuck of Kevin

>>57516657
They won't, it's too late. All 4:3 screen production assemblies are long dismantled and nobody is going to risk to be arsed to reinstate them.

>>57516657
>want to multitask
>have to buy 2 monitors instead of one

Epic meme

I like 16:9 for movies, TV and gaming.

>>57516657
Nah I think they are kinda cute for businesses and with that windows 10 background

>>57516657
When it stops being profitable.
/thread

>>57516682
>All 4:3 screen production assemblies are long dismantled

they're still making new 4:3 panels, idiot

File: long-egg-jp.jpg (110KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 2048x1536px

5:4 was literally retarded. It was just off of 4:3 but also not 1:1. It was an awkward in between. The only thing it was decent at was reading webpages.

>>57516657
I know that this is 2016, and you almost certainly don't remember what this place was actually like back in 2009-2011, but could you maybe take the time to learn to frame a fucking argument? How and why was it a mistake? What do you prefer instead? Why? Is your position objective or subjective? Can you demonstrate its objectivity? What are some unique use cases for your preferred product?

This thread represents everything wrong with /g/.