Any audio guys here?

>>57514503
bump

>>57514503
you are likely using a splitter in an inappropriate fashion where a proper mixer would be more appropriate. why do you need a mixer and a receiver on separate lines?

>>57514503
*also*
open up ms paint or some shit and draw a diagram of exactly how your shit is hooked up in it's entirety and i might actually be helpful

>>57514503
Maybe I didn't explain the chain well. I want to hear both my Dot and TV through my speakers while I watch TV, hence both of them feeding into the mixer and mixing the signal. But, since there is no way to mute my tv from the cable box (audio is always on) I have a split off of the Dot going to it's own line on the receiver for when I'm not watching TV and just want music.

>>57515275
Sure, will do right now, posting back in a min.

File: Untitled.png (195KB, 948x564px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 948x564px

Here is a terrible drawing. And as I said when I turn level knobs on mixer past 50% point, it gives artifacts in the audio channel that isn't passing through the mixer.

>>57515431
the shitty mixer is changing it's inputs' impedances as you gain it up and therefore fucks up your split and the load on the receiver side
don't use passive splits like that
don't use shitty mixers like that

>>57515431
You don't need that miniature line mixer at all in this setup. Just have the TV and the Dot plugged in to the AV receiver utilizing the selectable inputs.

OP, you're a faggot.

>>57515618
When I watch TV I want to still be able to hear responses from commands. When I listen to music on the Dot I don't want to hear the TV... how else do you propose I do that?

>>57515644
Get a fucking $20 mini mixer and stop posting