ITT: your dream laptop

>>57498410
>i5u
>Dual core

>>57498429
Im not doing anything intensive with it and I rather not have it run hot

4:3 matte screen, something approximating qhd, 15" would probably hit the spot
7 row full keytravvel keyboard. Would happily take it being heavier and thicker for mechanical, but I'm not aware what the design challenges are here. No backlighting, anti-microbial material
Wide choice of hardware configurations.
Good battery life. Everything else isn't too important

File: zenbook-3.jpg (2MB, 4608x3072px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4608x3072px

Zenbook 3
Core M
2 USB-C ports

That's all.

>>57498537
>Zenbook 3
it's beautiful, but id rather stick with my t450.

>>57498410
X220 but with
>1600x900 OLED matte screen
>better trackpad
>newer processor (which would offset the battery because I'd better power usage)
>maybe a dedicated GPU but that probably couldn't be fit in too well, not to mention thermal performance would be rubbish
>SSD
>good speakers

>>57498769
*1600x1200

>>57498797
I honestly prefer 16:10, so 1680x1050 preferably but if they put out a 1600x900 version, which would be more likely by far, I'd be content.

>>57498410
>pretty much t440
>lists over a dozen different features
So pretty much an entirely different laptop.

>>57498873
well you're wrong. but you're in luck, they might give you exactly what you want next year

>>57498410
13,3" or 14"
weight under 1,3 kg
2K OLED display or better
at least 512 GB SSD
at least 16 GB RAM
i7 processor
USB C, USB 3.1, VGA, Displayport
magnesium alloy body
clitmouse

a GPU
a speaker(s?)

Recently got Toshiba Z30t in near top conf, so I'm pretty close.

>>57498970
>well you're wrong
That's down to personal preference. That's fully opinion. And I do hope they give that but I doubt a thinkpad classic is going to happen.

>>57499079
USBC only for USB or Thunderbolt 3?

>>57498446
They don't get hot unless the cooling isn't shit.

T. 2670qm owner

>>57499542
For USB, as future proofing (people with USB C thumb drives, and some fancy peripherals that has not been invented yet).

>>57499903
Why not Thunderbolt 3 you stupid shit? It back supports USB3.1 gen 2

>>57499927
>Thunderbolt 3
Because I don't really know my ports. I thought it's some apple proprietary thingy I'll be able to plug only apple headphones in. It looks good, I want it now.

>>57498914
Same form factor but different features, cunt

I've literally never seen a matte OLED screen does one even exist?

File: new_sager_9873_photo_03_1.png (316KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

316KB, 500x500px

>Sager NP9873

Dont judge me, I want to be the coolest kind in the block.

File: 133_b.jpg (61KB, 1163x775px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 1163x775px

>>57501856

lets talk something I could actually buy with relative ease

>the best spec'd 15" 1680x1050 non-retina MBP that was ever released
>SSD
>the optical drive replaced w/ a HDD
>a new battery installed by service since it'd be used

should last me pretty long even if I got it now, as long as it won't break. I really don't do intensive stuff on my laptop.

>>57502360
also considering the weak spot of the macbooks
>2 extra chargers for it

seriously those fucks are really easy to break if one travels a lot with the machine, you need to treat them pretty gently

>>57502280
Oh, I remember seeing these.

There's no matte consumer grade OLED screens I assume though? IIRC those run you between 5 and 30 grand depending on what for a maximum 25 inch screen

>>57502360
That is literally the exact same pc as i have. Anti Glare higher res screen, with only 8 GB of ram tho. And SSD + HDD in drive bay and a new battery.